EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RaychelSnr
    Executive Editor
    • Jan 2007
    • 4845

    #1

    EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied


    Yesterday, we learned Electronic Arts was trying to get out of the legal entanglements of the Ed O'Bannon case in a motion filed with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Today, EA (and the rest of us) have learned their motion was promptly denied.

    "Given that NCAA football realistically portrays college football players in the context of college football games, the district court was correct in concluding that EA cannot prevail," wrote Judge Jay S. Bybee, in the decision.

    This simply means EA will be involved in whatever litigation is to come -- and whether they like it or not, EA is tied to the NCAA on this one.

    We'll of course continue to cover this case as it progresses through the courts, although final resolution is still years away.
    OS Executive Editor
    Check out my blog here at OS. Add me on Twitter.
  • KickassJohnson
    Rookie
    • Jan 2013
    • 231

    #2
    Re: EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

    Good

    10char

    Comment

    • huntt26
      Pro
      • Nov 2006
      • 899

      #3
      Re: EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

      Originally posted by KickassJohnson
      Good

      10char
      I disagree. It would be good if EA got out of this, otherwise the future of the game could be in jeopardy. The NCAA sucks.

      That being said, it totally makes sense for EA to be tied to this, the judge is right.

      Comment

      • rj88
        Rookie
        • Jul 2013
        • 11

        #4
        Re: EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

        The bigger issue is with the schools who let the NCAA operate like this.

        Comment

        • ghettogeeksta
          Banned
          • Sep 2011
          • 2632

          #5
          Re: EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

          Looks like it was a desperation move by EA.

          Comment

          • The_Rick_14
            Rookie
            • Apr 2012
            • 353

            #6
            Re: EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

            Originally posted by ghettogeeksta
            Looks like it was a desperation move by EA.
            It does? Because all it looked like to me was that EA tried to avoid a bunch of legal fees and took a chance. Doesn't seem like they lost anything by filing the motion.

            Comment

            • mestevo
              Gooney Goo Goo
              • Apr 2010
              • 19556

              #7
              Re: EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

              Lawsuits are requested to be dismissed at every opportunity that makes sense to do so. Pretty routinely done if not a number of times and probably won't be the last.

              Comment

              • Gramps91
                MVP
                • Sep 2010
                • 2115

                #8
                Originally posted by huntt26
                I disagree. It would be good if EA got out of this, otherwise the future of the game could be in jeopardy. The NCAA sucks.

                That being said, it totally makes sense for EA to be tied to this, the judge is right.
                yea I agree with huntt here. It sucks EA couldn't get out of this. This jeopardizes future NCAA gaming.
                NCAA: Kentucky Wildcats
                MLB: Atlanta Braves
                NBA: San Antonio Spurs

                Comment

                • CLW
                  Rookie
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 6

                  #9
                  This article is flat out WRONG. The Motion to Dismiss is still pending at the TRIAL COURT. This was a separate appeal to the 9th Circuit COURT OF APPEALS. EA can appeal the 9th Circuit's decision to the Supreme Court. The 9th Circuit has a BAD track record with SCOTUS nearly 80% of their cases are reversed when taken up to the high court. Just sayin'

                  Comment

                  • DorianDonP
                    MVP
                    • May 2010
                    • 1121

                    #10
                    Re: EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

                    Originally posted by ghettogeeksta
                    Looks like it was a desperation move by EA.
                    Not really. These are routine motions.

                    Comment

                    • LastExit
                      Rookie
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 328

                      #11
                      Re: EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

                      Originally posted by DorianDonP
                      Not really. These are routine motions.
                      Yup....they occur all the time in cases like these. The defendant doesn't lose anything by filing the motions and the worst that happens is that the trial proceeds.

                      Comment

                      • CLW
                        Rookie
                        • Apr 2010
                        • 6

                        #12
                        Re: EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

                        Again just an FYI as to the Procedural posture

                        9th Circuit ruling today - was on an "affirmative defense" 1st Amendment (free speech) completely bars any/all claims

                        EA can (and has indicated it will) ask the Supreme Court to review. Supreme Court has COMPLETE discretion in deciding whether or not to take appeal.


                        Motion to dismiss filed yesterday - STILL PENDING (to my knowledge) at the trial court in California. It argues Plaintiffs haven't stated a claim in their most recently filed Petition against EA. NO ruling has been made on it (but if you wanna bet - bet the farm EA loses at the trial level)

                        Comment

                        • JerseySuave4
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2006
                          • 5152

                          #13
                          by the time this is all said & done the SEC, Big 10, Big 12, Pac 12 & ACC will have separated from the rest of the NCAA D1 by then. That's coming sooner rather than later.

                          Comment

                          • Td1984
                            Pro
                            • Aug 2010
                            • 560

                            #14
                            Re: EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

                            Originally posted by JerseySuave4
                            by the time this is all said & done the SEC, Big 10, Big 12, Pac 12 & ACC will have separated from the rest of the NCAA D1 by then. That's coming sooner rather than later.
                            As a side note, wonder if they would twist ND's arm and force them into the ACC in football as well when that happens.
                            NCAA: Minnesota, Minnesota St-Mankato
                            NBA: Wolves
                            NHL: Minnesota North Stars (undefeated since 4/16/93), Wild
                            MLB: Twins, Dodgers
                            NFL: Vikings
                            MLS: Minnesota United
                            Premier League: Manchester United

                            Comment

                            • lord_mike
                              Rookie
                              • Jul 2008
                              • 47

                              #15
                              Re: EA's Motion to be Dismissed from O'Bannon Case Denied

                              Originally posted by CLW
                              Again just an FYI as to the Procedural posture

                              9th Circuit ruling today - was on an "affirmative defense" 1st Amendment (free speech) completely bars any/all claims

                              EA can (and has indicated it will) ask the Supreme Court to review. Supreme Court has COMPLETE discretion in deciding whether or not to take appeal.


                              Motion to dismiss filed yesterday - STILL PENDING (to my knowledge) at the trial court in California. It argues Plaintiffs haven't stated a claim in their most recently filed Petition against EA. NO ruling has been made on it (but if you wanna bet - bet the farm EA loses at the trial level)
                              I just read the appellate ruling. If upheld, it pretty much puts the kibosh on any future realistic college games ever. It's amazing that the exact same panel threw out Jim Brown's claims, but are upholding this one. I wonder if they will go to en banc or go straight to the SCOTUS on this one. How the SCOTUS will rule is anyone's guess. They are pretty strong on free speech and are pro business, but it seems that that the players' sob stories are affecting everyone in the legal system. If the SCOTUS denies the appeal in the fall, guess what? EA College football is pretty much done unless the NCAA changes rules on player compensation.

                              If this ruling is upheld, there will be a chilling effect on creativity of all types, from video games, to movies, to books to everything. These judges aren't thinking with their heads on straight.

                              Comment

                              Working...