Without 1 of the Major conferences, this game takes a serious blow. EA has to choose now if they want the game to be 100% generic or to include 90% of the other teams. This is alarming for all conference because SEC players are the least likely to join in the lawsuit since they are already paid. But for the other conferences who players aren't paid watch out.
SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: No SEC in Future College Football Video Games
Without 1 of the Major conferences, this game takes a serious blow. EA has to choose now if they want the game to be 100% generic or to include 90% of the other teams. This is alarming for all conference because SEC players are the least likely to join in the lawsuit since they are already paid. But for the other conferences who players aren't paid watch out. -
Re: No SEC in Future College Football Video Games
In theory we could keep some of the SEC teams and lose some of the others. It's up to the individual schools to decide if they wish to risk being in the game while these lawsuits are pending.Someone explain how this will really change anything?
I mean, not having the specific licensed SEC won't leave a big impact because there will be a generic one. Just like in the old playstation 1 and 2 Tiger Woods video games, they didn't have the Masters, but there was always a southern championship conveniently located in georgia, where it looked identical.
The only thing it really affects is commentary which will hopefully mean they take some of that money and put it to better, more updated, in depth commentary.Comment
-
Re: No SEC in Future College Football Video Games
The SEC is synonymous with college football. One of the great things about this series (as much as people love to bash it on these forums) is the authenticity in virtually every aspect. Not having the SEC is a major, major blow.Someone explain how this will really change anything?
I mean, not having the specific licensed SEC won't leave a big impact because there will be a generic one. Just like in the old playstation 1 and 2 Tiger Woods video games, they didn't have the Masters, but there was always a southern championship conveniently located in georgia, where it looked identical.
The only thing it really affects is commentary which will hopefully mean they take some of that money and put it to better, more updated, in depth commentary.Comment
-
Re: No SEC in Future College Football Video Games
You dropped that in there so casually. Absolutely genius. I lol'd.Without 1 of the Major conferences, this game takes a serious blow. EA has to choose now if they want the game to be 100% generic or to include 90% of the other teams. This is alarming for all conference because SEC players are the least likely to join in the lawsuit since they are already paid. But for the other conferences who players aren't paid watch out.Comment
-
Re: No SEC in Future College Football Video Games
Good point. I assume if it came down to it, they would choose to be 90% authentic, and only have the SEC generic as a bargaining tool for the future.Without 1 of the Major conferences, this game takes a serious blow. EA has to choose now if they want the game to be 100% generic or to include 90% of the other teams. This is alarming for all conference because SEC players are the least likely to join in the lawsuit since they are already paid. But for the other conferences who players aren't paid watch out.
But, I don't know enough about the last two statements. Please clarify for me-
SEC players are paid by whom?Comment
-
Re: SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
I wonder if O'Bannon even realizes what he's done. And if he does, if he cares at all. Taking years of enjoyment away from millions of people, for personal greed. Certainly the calling card of a villain.Anyone who claims to be a fan of two teams in the same pro sport is actually a fan of none.Comment
-
this looks to be the first domino to fall, pac 12 or big 10 will follow suit. they will be followed by the rest of the conferences. it isn't looking good for any more college sports video games, at least until the lawsuits are finished, and only if they go the ncaa and ea's way.Comment
-
Re: SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
Comment
-
Re: SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
I can't see this killing the game, as long as the SEC are the only one to pull out. If everyone else follows suit, and especially if any individual schools pull out (I'm thinking say ND) then it would probably kill the game.Comment
-
Re: SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
As frustrating as this issue is, we all have to understand the reasoning. Between decades of video games, jersey sales, etc. -- there is a ton of potential liability for the NCAA, conferences, and the member institutions. The O'Bannon lawsuit could just be the tip of the iceberg, much like the concussion issue in the NFL.
As another poster pointed out, the SEC is grossly profitable, and this was a smart business decision on their part...Comment
-
-
Re: SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
From the OS twitter feed:
Operation Sports @operationsports 3m
RT @ChrisSnr: This decision by the SEC does NOT involve member universities though. Alabama, Vandy, etc. are still in the game as of now.
So it would seem that no schools have pulled out yet.Comment

Comment