SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
http://kotaku.com/source-eas-next-co...ose-1151470614
....but there are hundreds of posts in this thread that say the game is dead. So many people and here said that the loss of the league logos would lead to the end of the series. They couldnt have possibly been wrong, could they?Comment
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
Overreaction. Here? WWWHHAATTTTTT.http://kotaku.com/source-eas-next-co...ose-1151470614
....but there are hundreds of posts in this thread that say the game is dead. So many people and here said that the loss of the league logos would lead to the end of the series. They couldnt have possibly been wrong, could they?Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
Well this is good news and makes the damage minimal to the '15 edition. I know the conferences do add to the landscape but as long as all the teams are there (with the exception of one) and the conference groupings should still be the same, I am a happy camper, seeing how this could have really turned pretty bad.http://kotaku.com/source-eas-next-co...ose-1151470614
....but there are hundreds of posts in this thread that say the game is dead. So many people and here said that the loss of the league logos would lead to the end of the series. They couldnt have possibly been wrong, could they?NFL - Buffalo Bills
MLB - St Louis Cardinals
NCAA Football - Michigan Wolverines
NCAA Basketball - UK WildcatsComment
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
I will not get NCAA 15 if ONE team dropped, one team dropped there is my declaration of the game...Also I am not getting it for PS4 unless they drop the price and that is not happening for a very long time.Comment
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
With all due respect to the author of that article, I'll wait to hear it straight from EA before I believe it. The SEC was out but now they are back in? I guess that that could be a legal thing (they already committed to be in the 2015 game) but at this point who knows.....a good question would be at what point does EA need a firm commitment from conferences and schools before the game goes into development. At some point they would have to tell schools and conferences that their either in or out.http://kotaku.com/source-eas-next-co...ose-1151470614
....but there are hundreds of posts in this thread that say the game is dead. So many people and here said that the loss of the league logos would lead to the end of the series. They couldnt have possibly been wrong, could they?Comment
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
Cool. Provided tje drop out is not one of my favorite teams itw still a must buyhttp://kotaku.com/source-eas-next-co...ose-1151470614
....but there are hundreds of posts in this thread that say the game is dead. So many people and here said that the loss of the league logos would lead to the end of the series. They couldnt have possibly been wrong, could they?Football: Denver Broncos
Baseball: Lehigh Valley Iron Pigs
Hockey: Allentown Phantoms
NCAA: The College of William and Mary Tribe
William and Mary Class of 2018!Comment
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
with the threat of schools dropping, I hope they can find a way to open up customization if they make the game next year.
Sports games out now limit customization. Like for example in NCAA teambuilder your only allowed 120 slots if you pay $10 for it, and you can only import 12 teambuilder schools into dynasty and they have to replace current schools.Comment
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
I wonder if the Pac-12 and Big 10 and the missing school will re-consider their positions in advance of the release. In the past FIFA has signed deal with specific teams and actually added them the same year as free DLC.
May be good news for a patch this year as well?Comment
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
Thank goodness. Looks like we will definitely be getting a '15.Writer for Operation Sports
Gamertag (Xbox One): Bengerman 1031
PSN Name: BadNewsBen
Twitter: @BadNewsBenV
Twitch: www.Twitch.TV/Bengerman10Comment
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
Owen Good is one of the most reliable writers in sports gaming. If he reports it I believe it.With all due respect to the author of that article, I'll wait to hear it straight from EA before I believe it. The SEC was out but now they are back in? I guess that that could be a legal thing (they already committed to be in the 2015 game) but at this point who knows.....a good question would be at what point does EA need a firm commitment from conferences and schools before the game goes into development. At some point they would have to tell schools and conferences that their either in or out.Comment
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
No doubt. He has the connections, and he's a legit fan of the series. He wouldn't report it if he was unsure, and wouldn't be confused about any information.Comment
-
Re: SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games
Thanks.....I had never heard of that website before I clicked on the link.
I hope this is right, but when the NCAA dropped out the conventional wisdom was that EA would have a deal with the CLC but each member would ultimately get to make its own decision. I find it hard to believe that the Athletic Director of the University of Washington would be overridden by underlings but who knows.Last edited by LastExit; 08-15-2013, 10:00 PM.Comment
-
Has this become a lawsuit nation? A simple video game can not escape this stuff.CBB:Alabama Crimson Tide
CFB:Alabama Crimson Tide
NBA:Detriot Pistons
MLB:New York Mets
NFL:San Francisco 49ersComment

Comment