A shame

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • K33057
    Rookie
    • Mar 2012
    • 259

    #1

    A shame

    After being excited watching the Great Videos on BB I got it tonite for $13.
    Very disappointed.. The Grafics are Great and post patch the replay is better. But Im one who just likes to make rosters and let the games play CPu vs CPu.. ofcourse with BB you cant.. I was hoping to even just play as an Olineman.. cant.. So Im hoping to get atleast a $5 trade in value for Some game.. Sad..
  • dcal
    Rookie
    • Aug 2011
    • 269

    #2
    Re: A shame

    The real shame is that Natural Motion quit after one try. I would like to see how much more they could do with the Next Gen systems higher IPC, which would clear some of the processing hurdles they dealt with on the Current Gen with their complex physics engine.
    Gamevid4 |videos by DCAL |
    https://www.youtube.com/user/Gamevid4

    Comment

    • tril
      MVP
      • Nov 2004
      • 2912

      #3
      Re: A shame

      Just played this again, wasnt a huge fan when this first came out but-

      truthfully, this game was 1-2 versions away from being a viable competitor to Madden. This game as is needed a few things

      1. different camera angles

      2. commentary/presentation- which would include players on the sidelines etc. players coming in and out when switching packages etc. no game has yet to do this. but I believe they would have done this based on their true sim approach.

      3. a few more customization options.

      The game has a franchise mode already. penalties work. it was great to see flags thrown on obvious pass interferences,

      the pace was definitely sim. The running game takes patience as does the passing game.
      speaking of passing games. best control scheme on this gen. and I also noticed that EA 25's run free took a page out of BB's running control scheme also.

      the kicking game was also pretty nice.

      I have a modded nfl file with the team names and logos but would like one with actual nfl players also

      Comment

      • jyoung
        Hall Of Fame
        • Dec 2006
        • 11132

        #4
        Re: A shame

        Originally posted by dcal
        The real shame is that Natural Motion quit after one try. I would like to see how much more they could do with the Next Gen systems higher IPC, which would clear some of the processing hurdles they dealt with on the Current Gen with their complex physics engine.
        You can't blame them for quitting a project that was losing money.

        The real shame is that not enough people bought the game for Natural Motion to continue putting money into Backbreaker.

        Football fans love to complain about Madden and NCAA games, but they never seem to support any of the products that offer alternatives.

        Comment

        • dcal
          Rookie
          • Aug 2011
          • 269

          #5
          Re: A shame

          Originally posted by jyoung
          You can't blame them for quitting a project that was losing money.

          The real shame is that not enough people bought the game for Natural Motion to continue putting money into Backbreaker.

          Football fans love to complain about Madden and NCAA games, but they never seem to support any of the products that offer alternatives.
          Very true. I was a die hard BB supporter that bought two copies of the game. I still hold out hope that NM will give it a go on Next Gen.
          Gamevid4 |videos by DCAL |
          https://www.youtube.com/user/Gamevid4

          Comment

          • cwash020
            Rookie
            • Sep 2009
            • 182

            #6
            Re: A shame

            You know...I go back and forth with this game. I have rented several times and my emotions range from loving it to wanting to beat it into submission. However, I played the demo again last night just because I am growing tired of the EA alternatives and I have to say I truly enjoyed the experience.

            Maybe it was because it was something different, or maybe it's because it plays better pre-patch. Nevertheless, I am going to rent from GF and buy it from them for cheap just to have my fball fix.

            Comment

            • Afrikan
              Banned
              • Apr 2004
              • 1462

              #7
              Re: A shame

              Originally posted by cwash020
              You know...I go back and forth with this game. I have rented several times and my emotions range from loving it to wanting to beat it into submission. However, I played the demo again last night just because I am growing tired of the EA alternatives and I have to say I truly enjoyed the experience.

              Maybe it was because it was something different, or maybe it's because it plays better pre-patch. Nevertheless, I am going to rent from GF and buy it from them for cheap just to have my fball fix.
              you should buy it for like $5-$10 if you can... The demo does a horrible job balancing play calls and situation...and just does a bad job representing the true game.

              since it is 2min QTRs, the Computer plays the game all wonky.

              Comment

              • KillRoy
                MVP
                • Jan 2003
                • 1369

                #8
                Re: A shame

                Originally posted by jyoung
                You can't blame them for quitting a project that was losing money.

                The real shame is that not enough people bought the game for Natural Motion to continue putting money into Backbreaker.

                Football fans love to complain about Madden and NCAA games, but they never seem to support any of the products that offer alternatives.

                Yeah, according to Vgchartz.com they only sold about 300,000 copies of this game for ps3 and x360 combined. I actually think that's pretty damn good from a total number of sells point of view when you consider that no one had ever heard of Natural Motion before BackBreaker was released.

                However, that was not enough to turn a profit. They lost money on this game. I think that camera angle in the game cost them a lot of sales.

                Comment

                • Afrikan
                  Banned
                  • Apr 2004
                  • 1462

                  #9
                  Re: A shame

                  even though I still loved the orginal camera..


                  they did try to move it back alittle bit


                  but they should've just gave everyone options....and let users choose who they wanted to play online... original cam player or any type cam player.

                  remember they had alternate control scheme that could've let you play it differently...changing intended receiver with the face buttons and throwing with a face button.....this also gave you a way to look off safety without close camera or Madden vision cone.

                  but yeah they should've gave the option to let some play with this camera view.

                  Comment

                  • TCFClemson
                    Rookie
                    • May 2012
                    • 211

                    #10
                    Re: A shame

                    They had a great base poured and just needed to refine it. They proved that full RTPs could work in a Football game. Unfortunately they needed more time to work on the AI.

                    I really do think they were not far off from having an amazing game. IMO they should have also allowed players to move the Camera angle if they wanted to. This would have probably increased their sales. They could have kept the upclose view if you wanted to have a "Superstar" mode or something like that.
                    Curently Playing:
                    On PS3- Old PS1 RPGs (Xenogears, FF 7 and 9, FF Tactics)
                    On PC: PUBG And Heroes of the Storm
                    I occasionally stream on twitch at twitch.tv/tcfclemson

                    Comment

                    • Nataris
                      Banned
                      • Dec 2013
                      • 37

                      #11
                      Re: A shame

                      Agreed, a bit of a let down. However, I also don't feel they were THAT far off the mark. Camera and controls killed the experience overall.

                      And it should have been $20 IMO.

                      Comment

                      • elgreazy1
                        MVP
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 2996

                        #12
                        Re: A shame

                        I was playing this game just the other day and I forgot how well it did some things.
                        + I love the overall graphics and how polished everything looks for a first effort.
                        + The physics are intense and you can really feel the weight and distribution of the players as they're running.
                        + I actually like the up-close camera angle, but agree, it would have been nice to have more options.

                        - My biggest gripe was that players seem to crumble too easily and would prefer to preserve their body over grinding out yards.
                        - The game pacing feels pretty dull but I'm sure much of that was due to no announcers and lack of a broadcast-type presentation.
                        My Arte
                        PS5: El_Greazy
                        Playing: College Football 2025, WWE 2K24, FIFA 21, Among Us, Party Animals

                        Comment

                        • FaceMask
                          Banned
                          • Oct 2013
                          • 847

                          #13
                          Re: A shame

                          It seems like every company who has put out a football game since the exclusive license, has all done something over-the-top except for Nerjyzed that put out BCFX. Only Blitz The League 1 had any kind of notable success and even Midway had enough sense to build a story, make some cool logos, and make it all seem believable, and that was hard to pull off considering Blitz The League was a total arcade-style football game.

                          But did any of these companies like 2K and NM ever stop and think that trying to be too different was part of why their games weren't a little more successful?

                          When you read what most football gamers ask for, their wishes seem all centered on a professional football game that reminds them of what we get in real life, and with tons of customization. Instead, we get a game with players built like robots (BackBreaker), and another game with no identity and abominable uniforms (All-Pro Football). And don't even get me started on Frozen Endzone (*shudders*).

                          I agree that football gamers don't support, well, anything. But Looking at the examples above, a large amount of blame has to be levied against the companies that have put these football games out. Sometimes, being too different just doesn't work.
                          Last edited by FaceMask; 12-27-2013, 08:12 AM.

                          Comment

                          • TreJayMMA
                            Pro
                            • Jul 2016
                            • 711

                            #14
                            Re: A shame

                            yeah..I actually really liked this game and the potential it had.
                            Loyal Browns fan

                            PSN: TreJay2000

                            Comment

                            Working...