 |
Quote: |
 |
|
|
 |
Originally Posted by MarvinOida |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And the whole "photorealistic," "ultra HD," and "4K" gimmicks. (Your eyes can't notice the difference people until we get to screens that are for MOVIE THEATERS or at least, bigger than a wall)Tapatalk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
If you can't tell the difference between a 720/1080p screen and a 4K screen, then you're seriously visually impaired. It's pretty stark.
The jump from standard definition TV to HD was 576i to 720p. The jump from 720p to 3,840p (4K) is a leap far larger and more noticeable IMO.
When it comes to frame rate, the human eye has a hard time differentiating above 60 fps. But when it comes to resolution, we still have a long way to go. The average throw-away magazine at 300dpi is far more crisp than your "high-end" 72dpi HD screen.
Just hold a common 600dpi+ printed piece/photo directly next to your "HD" TV and you'll realize we have decades to go in TV monitor development that the human eye can clearly notice.