NCAA Football 14: Simulating a Four-Team Playoff

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sra9888
    Rookie
    • Feb 2008
    • 288

    #16
    Re: NCAA Football 14: Simulating a Four-Team Playoff

    Yeah, except there's 10 conferences, so that wouldn't work with an 8 team tournament. That's why 16 would be fun.


    10 champ (now that there's no WAC), then 6 at large. Would give the great teams in the country a chance to show their skills against the best, while giving the little guys a glimmer of hope

    Comment

    • larkyyyyy
      Rookie
      • Jul 2010
      • 112

      #17
      Re: NCAA Football 14: Simulating a Four-Team Playoff

      Originally posted by XXstormmXX
      Currently, FSU, Auburn, Alabama, and MSU, the teams that would be in a playoff, all have one loss except for FSU. So I don't think one game could make or break a season in a four team playoff any more then a 16 team playoff.
      1. It would ruin bowl season
      2. It would ruin rivalry week, games such as this years Iron bowl would've be meaningless.
      3. Your argument doesn't make sense. Just because a team might still make it with 1 loss doesn't make it the same as a 3 or 4 loss team making it.

      Comment

      • tanchl
        Rookie
        • Jan 2012
        • 366

        #18
        Originally posted by XXstormmXX
        I'm glad there's no playoffs yet in CFB. Either do a 16 or more team tournament or stick with the BCS, don't do something halfway like the CFB playoffs will be.
        I so totally agree with the part you mentioned about doing it halfway (I would have used another 3 letter word after half

        We all will never see college football determine their champion the right way in our lifetime. The only way to determine a champion is on the field with the teams determined by the results of what they did on the field, not determined by a committee or a computer. Tradition, money, and power will always win out over creating the perfect system.

        Yeah, there are 10 conferences but I feel 5 of the conferences are truly not worthy of being in the consideration, that's just my view on the situation. There needs to be 8 conferences where each conference champion is in the playoffs. Or maybe 6 conferences with two wild cards. There could be several possibilities but it is all moot; the NCAA will never do this so we all just have to accept their half*** attempt.

        The 4 team playoff played out for this article isn't the way I would see it. I could not allow Alabama a chance to play for a title if they didn't even win their division. Unfair?, partially. Yeah, they are arguably the best team in the country, they play in arguably the toughest conference, and they were one fluke play away from earning the right to play for it all (this is why I think a wildcard team should be in the mix to account for a Alabama or that independent that would be worthy of a shot).

        Comment

        • Goblue8899
          Rookie
          • Jan 2014
          • 9

          #19
          The most obvious way to have a playoff( I like all of the bowl games too) is to have a 24-team playoff with the winner of every conference qualifying, and 14 at large seeds. I have an example of what it would look like if this were implemented this year. Keep in mind this is my opinion with the games, just focus on the format.
          (Seeding isn't shown but I used a standard 24-team playoff bracket)


          Seeding:
          1.FSU
          2.Auburn
          3.Alabama
          4.MSU
          5.Stanford
          6.Baylor
          7.Ohio state
          8.south Carolina
          9. Mizzou
          10. Oregon
          11. Oklahoma
          12. Clemson
          13.oklahoma state
          14.Lsu
          15.ucf
          16.arizona state
          17.UCLA
          18.louisville
          19.wisconcin
          20.texas a&m
          21.fresno state
          22.rice
          23.ul-Lafayette
          24.bowling green

          First round byes:
          1.FSU
          2.Auburn
          3.Alabama
          4.MSU
          5.Stanford
          6.Baylor
          7.Ohio state
          8.south Carolina
          ___________________________
          First round games:

          Arizona state vs UCLA
          Bowling green vs Mizzou

          Wisconsin vs Texas A&M
          Clemson vs Fresno state

          UCF vs Louisville
          Oregon vs UL-Lafayette

          Wisconsin vs LSU
          Oklahoma vs rice

          A few good games in Arizona state vs UCLA, Clemson vs fresno could be a good one. And Louisville beats UCF in a not so big rematch

          ___________________________
          Second round games:

          Florida state vs Arizona state
          South Carolina vs Mizzou

          Michigan state vs Texas A&M
          Stanford vs Clemson

          Auburn vs Louisville
          Ohio state vs oregon

          Alabama vs LSU
          Baylor vs Oklahoma

          Now this gets interesting. The first group has a rematch between two SEC east powers and Winston against a defense he could tear up.
          Michigan state vs Texas A&M would be a good match up because of the Michigan state defense, but Connor cook is overrated and the MSU offense loses the game for the Spartans.
          And of course oregon vs Ohio state would be a great matchup.
          ___________________________
          Third round games:
          Florida state vs South Carolina

          Texas A&M vs Stanford

          Auburn vs Ohio state

          Alabama vs Baylor

          South Carolina loss some key SEC games but I think they bounce back in a playoff and advance, but FSU will be a challenge.
          Texas A&M vs Stanford would be two totally different offenses so that would be interesting.
          I really wanted auburn vs oregon again in the playoff but I think Ohio state edges them out.
          I wish that Baylor was good enough to beat Alabama. And they are, their offense is simply the best in the country.
          ___________________________
          Final four:
          Florida state vs Texas a&m

          Ohio state vs Alabama

          Of course people start arguing intensely after this round but I like Ohio state over auburn and Johnny Manziel over Stanford.
          __________________________________________________ __
          So in the first ever final four we had a match up with two hiesman trophy winners, and a game that every NCAA 14 video game had as a championship. For me all but Texas a&m seem realistic here, but the Aggies got a few easier games then there counterparts. Maybe a 20th seed wasn't so bad. So for the first CFP championship we have:
          Florida state (17-0) vs Alabama (16-1)
          ____________________________________________

          So Alabama gets redemption and Florida state gets a shot at history, but in the end I don't think the playoff effects the outcome who wins the crystal ball, or whatever it is now, I say that Florida state comes out on top and becomes the first team to go (18-0) and win a CFP championship.

          FLORIDA STATE (18-0)

          Comment

          • Goblue8899
            Rookie
            • Jan 2014
            • 9

            #20
            Originally posted by larkyyyyy
            1. It would ruin bowl season
            2. It would ruin rivalry week, games such as this years Iron bowl would've be meaningless.
            3. Your argument doesn't make sense. Just because a team might still make it with 1 loss doesn't make it the same as a 3 or 4 loss team making it.
            I agree it would ruin rivalry week, which is why I love the bowl games too.
            But I do think that they should reduce the # of bowl games. Make it exclusive

            Comment

            Working...