Boston Bruins

[capergamer90]

so planning on starting a BAGM with the Bruins but not sure what to do with Subban, I mean Rask is very young so not like I need him to take over after a couple years. Should I keep him and see how he develops to possibly surpass Rask? should I deal him right away for a young forward or d, should i hold onto him till he develops more then deal him?

[AdamJones113]

Re: Boston Bruins

The stupid Leafs traded Rask away fro Andrew Raycroft. That's all I have to say on the matter (trade Subban for a young good prospect).

[s_mkheidze]

Re: Boston Bruins

I have to see Subban develop into a decent goalie....trade him for a decent pick/prospect.

[tWoSour]

Re: Boston Bruins

Don't forget about Svedberg, he's developed into an 84 after 2 years (started him in the ahl). I put Subban on the trade block, Edmonton offered me 2 1st round picks for him, see ya!

[BearishRiggs]

Re: Boston Bruins

It's harmless to keep him for a couple of years and see what he turns into. I've seen him at 88-89 overall a couple times. Plus it's not like the B's have any glaring weaknesses that need addressing right away.

[gooskyrights]

Re: Boston Bruins

I put Subban on the trade block, Edmonton offered me 2 1st round picks for him, see ya!

[TommyWizard]

Re: Boston Bruins

Trade.

In a recent GM Mode I picked him up, after the first draft I seen the Kings had a prospect... 4.5 yellow, much younger and much lower overall. I decided to trade for him.

Paid off in spades. Xavier Woodworth is a 3 time cup winner and elite goalie @ 88 overall and Rask stopped at 84 with Tampa Bay when he finished up.


Never seems to progress good when I notice him against teams

[mtownballa12]

Re: Boston Bruins

Trade him

The Bruins have enough goalie depth with Rask, Johnson, and Svedberg. Subban will be of more use to you if you turn him into draft picks or other high-end players to boost the roster.

[Pezell04x]

Re: Boston Bruins

so planning on starting a BAGM with the Bruins but not sure what to do with Subban, I mean Rask is very young so not like I need him to take over after a couple years. Should I keep him and see how he develops to possibly surpass Rask? should I deal him right away for a young forward or d, should i hold onto him till he develops more then deal him?

Trade him. You'll have Rask for a guaranteed six years (unless you want to move him) and Svedberg in the AHL. Can probably get a decent return for him. If EDM offers you two firsts like they did with the other guy - jump on it as quickly as possible.