NCAA 15
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
Re: NCAA 15
Few are a bigger of fan of EA's football franchise than me, but this cancellation isn't the players' fault. It's 100% on the shoulders of EA.Favorite Teams:
College #1: Michigan Wolverines
College #2: Michigan State Spartans (my alma mater)
College #3: North Carolina Tar Heels
NHL: Detroit Redwings
Comment
-
Re: NCAA 15
I disagree, They never included any names period, there was likeness. But it comes down to why is it a big deal that EA makes money off the athletes, the colleges do? the NCAA does?
It comes down to a bunch of has beens wanting a free handout(Which they didnt get, they got a couple hundred per player) They just ruined it for everyone else. Could EA have released a more generic games with less likeness sure. But it had been that way dating back to the original game and how many of those players filed lawsuits?
Lets take Denard Robinson for example, they interviewed him and he said he was Blessed and Thankful to be included in the game(On the Cover). Did he ask for any money? Nope nor did he support that lawsuitLast edited by wolverinemaniac; 05-13-2014, 04:31 PM.Comment
-
Re: NCAA 15
There's no point in another 'should college football players be paid' thread. Suffice it to say due to licensing issues there is no NCAA football game until further notice.Teams: Minnesota Vikings, Cincinnati Reds, Marshall Thundering Herd, Virginia Tech Hokies (2010 alum)Comment
-
-
Re: NCAA 15
The lawsuit is going to drag on for a couple of years, on top of appeals processes that either party will file. There isn't going to be a game as long as that lawsuit is unresolved.Comment
-
Re: NCAA 15
EA never had an issue paying college athletes for their likeness. Matter of fact, why did EA settle their portion of the lawsuit with the athletes and agree to backpay all the players that were potentially used?
The issue was never EA, they were collateral damage... the middle man in a larger fight. The issue is the NCAA's rules of amateurism. EA followed the NCAA's guidelines of not paying players, and not using their names. EA's lawsuit payout is being blocked by the NCAA. That's where the issues stem from.
Considering the amount of money EA shells out per sports games for licensing, they wouldn't have cared about $250,000 (the aggregate cost for the licensing based on the lawsuits) for licensing college games. NFL is 2.2 million. NBA live was $675,000. NHL was 1.1 million. The NCAA cost was a fraction of the cost, especially considering each year EA donated $200,000 to the general college scholarship fund as part of the NCAA licensing agreement.
The reason we don't have a college football game, is because archaic rules haven't caught up the reality of modern money yet.Comment
-
Re: NCAA 15
I disagree, They never included any names period, there was likeness. But it comes down to why is it a big deal that EA makes money off the athletes, the colleges do? the NCAA does?
It comes down to a bunch of has beens wanting a free handout(Which they didnt get, they got a couple hundred per player) They just ruined it for everyone else. Could EA have released a more generic games with less likeness sure. But it had been that way dating back to the original game and how many of those players filed lawsuits?
Lets take Denard Robinson for example, they interviewed him and he said he was Blessed and Thankful to be included in the game(On the Cover). Did he ask for any money? Nope nor did he support that lawsuitComment
-
-
Re: NCAA 15
It'll be years before this all shakes out. I think a reform of collegiate athletics is eminent, but it's going to be a slow process. You guys ever watch that Netflix documentary "Schooled"? It does a pretty good job of explaining the whole situation.----------------------
PSN/Steam: southtitan
----------------------Comment
Comment