I'm broadcasting a game using the FBG rosters. Everything is default AP except I'm using slow speed 0 thresh. Also it's the version before rookies. Someone else is doing teams so I am waiting until he puts the file back up before I update. It's spectator mode so there is no user influence
FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
I'm broadcasting a game using the FBG rosters. Everything is default AP except I'm using slow speed 0 thresh. Also it's the version before rookies. Someone else is doing teams so I am waiting until he puts the file back up before I update. It's spectator mode so there is no user influence
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
I'll be showing some games off an on all day.Comment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
Keep in mind this is still Madden. At default the QB's are still going to be too accurate. I think I'm just going to go back to 50 threshold too. The QB's had a more realistic accuracy % at 50. I just forgot to change it back. I'm going to get the FBG roster that someone just PMed me that is more updated and has some rookies.Comment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
Got a good one going with Johnny Football and the Browns against the Bills. I don't think the Bills have their rookies yet but, the Browns doComment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
That just doesn't make sense. Both Jordan and Mathis have the same 4 game suspension. Therefore, any official scouting service would have a specific protocol to handle suspended players. It makes no sense to say "Robert Mathis only deserves a 2.4 FMV because he is suspended" but "Dion Jordan deserves a 3.2 FMV because he is suspended as well". Especially when Mathis is a much better player than Jordan at this point. No scouting service operates like that, and if they do, it isn't one that anyone with common sense would use.2k15 MyTeam PS4
Always down for a game
C- Pink Shaq/Saph Russell/Saph Moses Malone
PF- Saph Hakeem/ Gold Lebron/ Saph David Robinson
SF- Pink Melo/ Diamond KD
SG- 90-91 MJ/ Ruby 97-98 Kobe
PG- Ruby Magic/ Ruby PaytonComment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
Every player and their situations are different. Mathis is still graded out at 2.8 in his category correlating to the FMV attribute. Jordan is still graded at 1.4 in his. The suspension, injury, or whatever case happens to any player simply modifies the final value by a multiplier. Once he is designated good to go for a return, the multiplier will be adjusted. Keep in mind that we also have to work within the framework of EA's OVR formulas and can't just rate players in an equal-interval method without an OVR value to meet. Last time I did that, people were pissed because guys like Wes Welker were coming in at 75 instead of 90 or whatever, WHICH I CAN SEE as being an issue for contracts, trade values, etc.That just doesn't make sense. Both Jordan and Mathis have the same 4 game suspension. Therefore, any official scouting service would have a specific protocol to handle suspended players. It makes no sense to say "Robert Mathis only deserves a 2.4 FMV because he is suspended" but "Dion Jordan deserves a 3.2 FMV because he is suspended as well". Especially when Mathis is a much better player than Jordan at this point. No scouting service operates like that, and if they do, it isn't one that anyone with common sense would use.Dan B.
Player Ratings Administrator
www.fbgratings.com/members
NFL Scout
www.nfldraftscout.com/members
Petition to EA for FBG Ratings:
https://www.change.org/p/ea-sports-t...bers-index-phpComment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
I'm broadcasting the rest of the CLE/Buff game now. It might be laggy because I think everyone in the whole house in using a device on the internet. lol
I think slow 35 thresh is proving to be the best with these rosters.Comment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
Watching it now. Pretty cool man!Dan B.
Player Ratings Administrator
www.fbgratings.com/members
NFL Scout
www.nfldraftscout.com/members
Petition to EA for FBG Ratings:
https://www.change.org/p/ea-sports-t...bers-index-phpComment
-
Comment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
I must say, you don't see as much herky jerky player movement. They seem to run and interact a bit more smoothly.Dan B.
Player Ratings Administrator
www.fbgratings.com/members
NFL Scout
www.nfldraftscout.com/members
Petition to EA for FBG Ratings:
https://www.change.org/p/ea-sports-t...bers-index-phpComment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
showing Seahawks at Panthers now. No rookies.Comment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
What do you guys do with/about the rookie classes once in a CFM?Comment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
Ill show the rest of that game later tonight. Looks like it's going to be a defensive battleComment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
But would they break it down to the components, assign each one a individual grade and then add them all up? Could you speak to how rigid the grading is? How much variance is there between different scouts?
This next question you may not be able or willing to answer, but how much variance is there for the entire data set? How is the distribution? The scale is 0.0 to 5.0 correct? Would you mind providing something of a landmark? Like the typical all pro grades at 3.8, average starter would be what? If I am getting too close to asking for specifics or information that you would rather not share I understand. Sorry if I am asking too many questions.Comment
-
Re: FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game
My guess would be 4.0-5.0 (blue chip) 3.0-3.99(red chip) 2.4-2.99 (purple)But would they break it down to the components, assign each one a individual grade and then add them all up? Could you speak to how rigid the grading is? How much variance is there between different scouts?
This next question you may not be able or willing to answer, but how much variance is there for the entire data set? How is the distribution? The scale is 0.0 to 5.0 correct? Would you mind providing something of a landmark? Like the typical all pro grades at 3.8, average starter would be what? If I am getting too close to asking for specifics or information that you would rather not share I understand. Sorry if I am asking too many questions.
Then the restComment

Comment