Recommended Videos
Collapse
Best roster at the moment?
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: Best roster at the moment?
None for this year bc everyone has been waiting on Mizzou's roster and noone else created one. I just checked in for the hell of it but with Madden on the way I'm done holding my breath. The 1996 Roster is the best if you like the players of the era. That's what I've been using and will continue to do so.Comment
-
-
Re: Best roster at the moment?
This post has false information in it. There is OSFM v1 and v2. There is also OSFM v3 w/pitch edits. And there is Hybrid v2.1a. All of which are decent rosters. In would be more accurate to say that more up-to-date rosters are also in progress.None for this year bc everyone has been waiting on Mizzou's roster and noone else created one. I just checked in for the hell of it but with Madden on the way I'm done holding my breath. The 1996 Roster is the best if you like the players of the era. That's what I've been using and will continue to do so.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: Best roster at the moment?
No, The Show's updated roster is better than the ones you mentioned... To call all of them "decent rosters" suggesting they are practical to put into use at this time is pretty far out... I mentioned the singular major project in progress which the community (myself included) became overdependent on.Comment
-
Re: Best roster at the moment?
Gonna have to agree with Dynasty here. The threads topic is "Best roster at the moment?" He thinks 1996 and I could not agree more. How is his information false when its opinion based. The other thing is if you say these other rosters are just decent then aren't you agreeing with his opinion that those rosters aren't that great.No, The Show's updated roster is better than the ones you mentioned... To call all of them "decent rosters" suggesting they are practical to put into use at this time is pretty far out... I mentioned the singular major project in progress which the community (myself included) became overdependent on.Comment
-
Re: Best roster at the moment?
Does anyone know what the difference will be between Mizzou's upcoming release and Hybrid v3? Is it just the differences in player evaluation opinion from the respective creators? Difference in number of prospects included? Or is one for example optimized for 30 team control - i.e. something gameplay-structural like that?Comment
-
Re: Best roster at the moment?
If it works on current gen, I'd like to peddle my very own 1994 mod :-) Not claiming it's the best, that would be the OSFM, but I think it's worth playing if you like old-school ball :-)Comment
-
Re: Best roster at the moment?
None for this year bc everyone has been waiting on Mizzou's roster and noone else created one. I just checked in for the hell of it but with Madden on the way I'm done holding my breath. The 1996 Roster is the best if you like the players of the era. That's what I've been using and will continue to do so.That's an odd view on it. I definitely will disagree that an SCEA roster (with no real minor league players) could even be considered better than an OSFM base.No, The Show's updated roster is better than the ones you mentioned... To call all of them "decent rosters" suggesting they are practical to put into use at this time is pretty far out... I mentioned the singular major project in progress which the community (myself included) became overdependent on.
The false info is what I've bolded above. I am not saying the claim about 1996 rosters is false, but to say no one but mizzou has been working on a roster is just flat ignorant. What about all those roster sets I mentioned that are OSFM-based? If you were reading dynasty with too many y's original post, apparently that never happened.Gonna have to agree with Dynasty here. The threads topic is "Best roster at the moment?" He thinks 1996 and I could not agree more. How is his information false when its opinion based. The other thing is if you say these other rosters are just decent then aren't you agreeing with his opinion that those rosters aren't that great.
It's several different things, some of which you have mentioned. I'd suggested reading the OP in both threads to get a better idea.Does anyone know what the difference will be between Mizzou's upcoming release and Hybrid v3? Is it just the differences in player evaluation opinion from the respective creators? Difference in number of prospects included? Or is one for example optimized for 30 team control - i.e. something gameplay-structural like that?Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Comment
-
Re: Best roster at the moment?
Would be awesome if you could upload that and post the name on here!Comment
-
Re: Best roster at the moment?
im so upset.
i had a re-rated roster coming out today but after 14 teams it oversaved the default disk roster onto mine for some reason and now im abandoning all hope of getting it done again (granted it would take 2 days max lol)Comment

Comment