[DaBoyBk]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rashidi

As an example then to see i I understand correctly. I have Jason Smith (PF/C) rated at the following positions PG: 58 SG: 66 SF: 72 PF: 71 C: 68 What you are roughly saying is that he will rate 72 Overall (his SF rating) even if I have him at center, because that is his peak value across all of the formulas.

Quote: Originally Posted by Ruff Ryder

I understood it more as based off of a player type formula such as: Rebounding: 66 Face Up: 70 Back to Basket: 68 Athletic: 65 And then it would choose his overall as a 70. My other question now (assuming I'm understanding this correctly) is will you get an accurate depiction of regression? If a guy like, say, Paul George, who may be an 88 overall as an "all-around" SF regresses in his offensive ratings, will the formula recalculate and still have him at an 88 overall because he may now be an 88 as a defensive player type but an 86 as an all-around?

Man... @Rashidi @RuffRyder and all others here I think we need @bedwardsroy19 to get a little more in depth hopefully soon as we still dont have a definitive idea of what this new formula means or how its calculated