Operation Sports Forums - View Single Post

2_headedmonster · 11-17-2014, 12:32 PM

VERY subtle bumping is alright, but the bumping as it is should be called fouls and be used with terrible defenders and big men. There should be no animation that haults a ball-handler unless contact with the defender is square in the chest.

Other wise contact should be represented with completely inturruptible shoulder and hip riding animations to take angles away rather than over-power the ball-handler with collisions.

Czar said they want to get people accustomed to going around defenders rather than through, which I love. I think much quicker hip turning animations with the speed tied to the "lateral quickness" rating would help as well.

11-17-2014, 12:32 PM	#6
2_headedmonster MVP OVR: 3 Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Deep in the heart...	Re: The bumpback animation. Your thoughts? VERY subtle bumping is alright, but the bumping as it is should be called fouls and be used with terrible defenders and big men. There should be no animation that haults a ball-handler unless contact with the defender is square in the chest. Other wise contact should be represented with completely inturruptible shoulder and hip riding animations to take angles away rather than over-power the ball-handler with collisions. Czar said they want to get people accustomed to going around defenders rather than through, which I love. I think much quicker hip turning animations with the speed tied to the "lateral quickness" rating would help as well.