 |
Quote: |
 |
|
|
 |
Originally Posted by Rashidi |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://thereal2kinsider.blogspot.com...r-ratings.html
POINT GUARD (11)
87 (NC) John Wall (WAS, 19.9 PER)
81 (NC) Isaiah Thomas (BOS, 20.6 PER)
75 (-1) Tony Wroten (PHI, 14.9 PER)
75 (NC) Aaron Brooks (CHI, 14.4 PER)
73 (+1) Isaiah Canaan (PHI, 12.4 PER)
72 (+2) Shelvin Mack (ATL, 13.2 PER)
72 (NC) Langston Galloway (NYK, 12.3 PER)
72 (NEW) Cameron Payne (OKC, Rookie)
70 (-1) Shane Larkin (BKN, 10.9 PER)
70 (+3) Spencer Dinwiddie (DET, 10.2 PER)
69 (NEW) Pierre Jackson (PHI, Rookie)
SHOOTING GUARD (7)
85 (NC) Kobe Bryant (LAL, 17.6 PER)
77 (+1) Avery Bradley (BOS, 11.5 PER)
74 (-1) Jodie Meeks (DET, 14.1 PER)
73 (NC) C.J. Miles (IND, 14.1 PER)
72 (+2) C.J. McCollum (POR, 13.1 PER)
72 (NC) Evan Fournier (ORL, 12.4 PER)
72 (NEW) Devin Booker (PHX, Rookie)
SMALL FORWARD (8)
94 (-2) LeBron James (CLE, 25.9 PER)
91 (-3) Kevin Durant (OKC, 27.6 PER)
74 (+2) Anthony Morrow (OKC, 14.8 PER)
74 (+1) Evan Turner (BOS, 12.8 PER)
73 (NEW) Stanley Johnson (DET, Rookie)
73 (-1) Terrence Ross (TOR, 11.2 PER)
71 (+1) Kyle Anderson (SAS, 8.2 PER)
67 (+2) Devyn Marble (ORL, 5.9 PER)
POWER FORWARD (7)
86 (-1) Pau Gasol (CHI, 22.7 PER)
77 (-3) Jared Sullinger (BOS, 17.9 PER)
77 (NEW) Kristaps Porzingis (NYK, Rookie)
76 (-3) David Lee (BOS, 17.8 PER)
70 (NC) Anthony Tolliver (DET, 11.1 PER)
69 (-3) Quincy Acy (SAC, 12.8 PER)
69 (-3) Perry Jones (BOS, 6.9 PER)
CENTER (6)
83 (-3) Al Horford (ATL, 21.4 PER)
83 (-2) Andre Drummond (DET, 21.4 PER)
81 (NC) Hassan Whiteside (MIA, 26.2 PER)
79 (-2) Rudy Gobert (UTA, 21.6 PER)
76 (-1) Tyler Zeller (BOS, 18.9 PER)
73 (NEW) Myles Turner (IND, Rookie)
Among non-Rookies
PGs: +0.44
SGs: +0.33
SFs: -0.14
PFs: -2.16
Cs: -1.60
Those are not bad PF/C who have been revealed either. Multiple stars just dropped lower than BroKebe.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Interesting. Personally (and I'm no ratings guys at all), I can't draw any conclusions from it yet because the sample sizes are small enough that they are really just suggestive, not conclusive, of anything. . . yet. They do raise questions, though.
For example, of the new attribute ratings systems is based off of an all time set of benchmarks for corresponding player behavior/stats, then, by adopting a more standard ratings philosophy, did something about the balance among positions change?
That is, did they discover that, for some reason, their past subjective ratings favored bigs too much? I would find that hard to believe having played the game a few years, but was that an outcome?
Or, as they reworked ratings by attribute, did they also try to benchmark past all time PER ratings against the game's OVR ratings, and as a result, try to rework the way they computed OVR? That is, did the OVR formula under the hood change this year in how it weights attributes by position? If so, why, and based on what?
Do they think that, by trying to become more standardized in ratings, that the game will now reflect the relative historical weakness of bigs overall in the league now? Or does the OVR rating suffer because bigs get fewer stats in today's game the way it is played?
It bears watching as we get the full league ratings. To me though it raises questions. It's hard to hold out past ratings as a standard for anything when they were already pretty. . . inconsistent, but if there's more of a standard now, it would be good to hear more about how the ratings were derived this year for OVR.
And as a Kincks fan, love the KP rating, but yeah, I mean. . . huh? Rookies are dart board to rate anyway, so apparently K-Pizzle has a fan in Mike Stauffer.
Nice work, Rashidi!