I completely understand what you're saying but Wroten only played something like 30 games. That's a really small sample size in the grand scheme of things. His averages over 30 games shouldn't be comparable to the per game averages of a guy who played 20+ more games than he did.
Rose when he was healthy is beyond what Wroten could even dream of being.
Now? Sure since his athleticism took a knock it's different. But to compare them after wroten had one decent season on a very bad team? Come on man.
Also you have to look at all the numbers.
Rose held opposing PGs to an average PER of 14 (<NBA average) an eFG% of 44% and forced almost 3 turnovers per game.
Wroten held opposing PGs to an average PER of 19 (>NBA average). An eFG% of 54% and forced 4 turnovers per game.
Philly were actually better defensively when Wroten was on the bench. They gave up 111 points per 100 possessions with Wroten on the floor. They gave up 104 points when Wroten was on the bench.
With Rose, the Bulls gave up 105 points per 100 possessions with Rose on the floor and 106 with him on the bench.
Rose was a plus defender last year, Wroten wasn't.
With Wroten on the floor Philly allowed more assisted field goals, a higher eFG% and turned the ball over more on offense.
Wroten had a DRtg of 106.6 while Rose was 105.1 so Rose was in the top 40 out of all players (playing > 24mpg). And Wroten was in the top 150 (he was about 148th)
And when you compare the offense you have to remember 44% of Wroten's made baskets were assisted on. Compared to 35% of D.Rose. Rose is clearly better at creating for himself.
Again. Small sample sizes so I don't take too much from it. But I think it's still to early to compare them properly.

Comment