WWE 2K16 Review (PS4/XB1)

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • veryhonestgamer
    Just started!
    • Sep 2015
    • 3

    #46
    This game is excellent in my opinion. 9 out of 10. As for the universe mode, its not broken, it just has its own set of rules that need to change maybe in a patch or the next time the game is released. Its WWE universe, so ur confined within WWE rules. lol

    Comment

    • veryhonestgamer
      Just started!
      • Sep 2015
      • 3

      #47
      Also I had my crowd screaming "suplex city" and "this is awesome" going wild when me and a friend did a Brock Lensar vs Undertaker last mane standing.....

      Comment

      • DBMcGee3
        MVP
        • Oct 2011
        • 1166

        #48
        So I've been playing the game a lot this weekend, and while I haven't tried enough of the game to give a full review, here were things that stood out to me:

        Pros:

        - The match pace feels great this year. I loved all the transitions, like when the guys are tired and they crawl to the ropes, etc. It just feels a bit less chaotic than in years past. I love how guys will stay down for awhile when they're really hurt as well.

        - The roster is incredible. Rick Rude's intro FTW!

        - The mini-games are fun so far. I never played 2k15, so thus far I'm enjoying the slow build up into each match. This may be something I loathe in 2 weeks but cool for now.

        -2k showcase. I love the Stone Cold story and the cinematic intros. While it does eventually get tiring playing so many straight 1 v 1 matches with the same character, at least it's Stone Cold.

        - Less glitchy moments. Yes, there are still glitches, but I've found a huge improvement in certain notoriously glitchy situations, like running strikes and throwing guys into the steps and other things at ringside. It just looks more fluid and you feel some sort of impact on virtually every attack. I also love how guys will drag the opponent towards the center of the ring before performing certain moves.

        Cons:

        - The creation suite seems like a step back. Maybe I need more time with this, but I tried downloading a few CAWs, and it seems they only have 1 attire? I saw where you can tweak Superstars by copying them and then choosing to make the copy an alternate attire, but it all seems really clunky to me. I HATE the hashtag searching as well.

        - CAW entrances are awful. Where are all the generic entrances, or those from older superstars? Seems like basically you can only use entrance material from superstars who are in the game already. Am I wrong about this? Please tell me I am. Also, you can't import theme songs??? This could be a legitimate deal breaker for me. Is this just a PS4 issue?

        - Charged Finishers. Maybe this is petty, but I much preferred the feel of the wake up taunts. You had more options that way and more of an opportunity for a reversal it seemed to me.

        Anyway, I'm sure I've got lots yet to experience, but so far my take is that this is a potentially great game, held back by some inexplicable regressions in key areas.

        Comment

        • RaychelSnr
          Executive Editor
          • Jan 2007
          • 4845

          #49
          Just to respond to concerns about the score, I think people have forgotten again what the OS scale is meant to do. We are basically locked into a 1-10 point scale for a couple of outside reasons, so we made the conscious decision to actually use the entire 1-10 points in the scale to rate games. That means that a 6.5 on OS doesn't mean its a 'D' as many people are assuming.

          In reality, it's the equivalent to a 3.5 star out of 5 star review or a 2.5 out of 4, or in letter grades...probabably a C+ to B-. I never once said the game was bad, and I don't feel that way. But in many ways I do think the game is too shallow to be good and too buggy to be good as well. If many of these same types of bugs were in a Madden or NBA 2K, the community would be in an uproar. I'm probably too tough on many games, but I hold them all to a pretty high standard and apply the scale fairly.

          Regardless, its just my opinion on the game. The scale even says fans of the sport will enjoy the games in the above average range -- and that certainly seems to be the case. I too am enjoying MyCareer and would enjoy Universe immensely if there weren't so many artificial limitations (I did knock the score for Universe mode being generally poorly executed).

          So yeah there's that.

          You can read the full rubric here:
          http://www.operationsports.com/MMChr...h-score-means/
          OS Executive Editor
          Check out my blog here at OS. Add me on Twitter.

          Comment

          • philliesphan026
            Rookie
            • Jul 2005
            • 375

            #50
            Re: WWE 2K16 Review (PS4/XB1)

            Originally posted by dubcity
            I'll start feeling bad for developers when games stop costing $60 a pop. I'm sure they're doing fine, lol.
            When you consider that games cost millions of dollars and 2-5 years to make (depending on the game), and that the price of AAA games hasn't gone up since 2005 here in the US, we're pretty fortunate games still only cost $60...
            PSN: sleepy1nsomniac

            Comment

            • Sgt_Carnage
              Banned
              • Feb 2014
              • 949

              #51
              Re: WWE 2K16 Review (PS4/XB1)

              Glad I don't base my purchases on OS review scores.

              Comment

              • Traceur
                Rookie
                • Sep 2014
                • 96

                #52
                Re: WWE 2K16 Review (PS4/XB1)

                Originally posted by Sgt_Carnage
                Glad I don't base my purchases on OS review scores.
                Agreed. The review is a joke. I don't care what "scale" is being used. This is one of the best WWE games in a long time.

                Comment

                • dubcity
                  Hall Of Fame
                  • May 2012
                  • 17876

                  #53
                  Re: WWE 2K16 Review (PS4/XB1)

                  Metacritic score is down to 79 on PS4. The user score is 7.6. XB1 score is worse. Not quite the universally praised game it looked to be a little while back.
                  Last edited by dubcity; 11-04-2015, 03:47 AM.

                  Comment

                  • SmashMan
                    All Star
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 9795

                    #54
                    Re: WWE 2K16 Review (PS4/XB1)

                    Originally posted by dubcity
                    Metacritic score is down to 79 on PS4. The user score is 7.6. XB1 score is worse. Not quite the universally praised game it looked to be a little while back.
                    I'm trying to figure out your angle here. Is it that those who are enjoying the game shouldn't be?

                    Comment

                    • dubcity
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • May 2012
                      • 17876

                      #55
                      Re: WWE 2K16 Review (PS4/XB1)

                      Originally posted by SmashMan
                      I'm trying to figure out your angle here. Is it that those who are enjoying the game shouldn't be?

                      No, it just bugs me when people bash a review/opinion of a game just because it doesn't seemingly fall in line with the supposed majority opinion.

                      Comment

                      • nate1986
                        MVP
                        • Sep 2012
                        • 1185

                        #56
                        Re: WWE 2K16 Review (PS4/XB1)

                        Reviewers for the IGNs and Operation Sports are like us that don't work for them a gamer with an opinion thats all reviews are

                        Comment

                        Working...