[24ct]

I think ppl are taking this too far honestly. If LeBron drew a tattoo he would own that intellectual property. If he got it tatted the studio wouldn't own it based on copyright laws. Unless of course the actual picture he drew wasn't copywritten by LeBron himself. Then the studio could technically copyright the picture & own it. Like Michael Jackson purchased the Beatles discography. He bought it. If I draw/create something & don't get it copywritten then someone else can copywrite it & own it. That goes with an idea or whatever. If I don't copyright it I own the intellectual property by default. But if someone copyrights it 1st they own that copyright as physical evidence regardless of me owning the intellectual property. Obviously the guys who created these works of art got the work registered. That's how they're able to sue & get a settlement.