Quick counts allowed me to get through several seasons this year. Let's not forget about that addition. Wasn't that poll posted in 2013, well before that was added?
MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
Aside from the year to year saves, quick counts has been the greatest addition to the series IMO. It has allowed me to play every game going into my 6th year with my cubbies. I started the franchise with a prospect roster on mlb 14 for the PS3. I'm currently in year 2019 on the PS4. There is something about drawing a walk after starting with an 0-2 count. I was way too swing happy with it off, the quick count allows me to knock out games faster and also take walks and walk the cpu at more realistic clips.Comment
-
Re: MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
Quite a few people (at least on this site) go through multiple seasons but don't play every game.Comment
-
Re: MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
They could do it with an on/off switch but then it takes time away from other things the devs could be working on.≡Comment
-
Re: MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
I own FIFA. What is being suggested is you can't see any player ratings even on your own team. That is a far cry from what FIFA has where you can hire multiple scouts and they can scout a lot of players at the same time. For players in the low minors I could see a system similar to FIFA although I'm not sure what purpose it would serve other than busy work in a franchise but for MLB players there aren't a lot of deep, closely held secrets regarding their abilities. Teams have video on all of their opponents.
They could do it with an on/off switch but then it takes time away from other things the devs could be working on.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
Again, I think it would be interesting to see actual data on this, but my sense is that many many more people are constantly restarting with new teams/rosters and dabbling in other modes compared to those that are dedicated to progressing through 1+ seasons in the same franchise (whether playing all the games or not playing all of the games). With no data, it's really a futile exercise to debate.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
I think this is the key. There is no incentive for the devs to give us a toggle to turn ratings on/off. The amount of people that would actually want this added in would not warrant their investment of time. I mean if 50k people is not enough to force online franchise changes, then 4-5 guys on a message board who want something that most people don't necessarily care about shouldn't even register. Besides, these people are buying the game already.
Users can simply provide any feedback (so long as it's done in a respectful manner), if they find some parts of the game unappealing/unsatisfying. Ultimately I think that's why someone like Ramone has built the bridge between the developers and users (and hasn't burned it... yet).
For example, Ramone in the past mentioned a coupe times that the manage-only mode literally gets used by just a couple dozen people. By your argument, there is absolutely no reason for the developers to put any resource on that mode. They certainly are not keeping MoM just as a courtesy for what Knight has done for The Show community overall...
Sometimes, the developers do things like that.
It's just amazing how some people in this forum are quick to dismiss what they do not like to hear themselves...Comment
-
Re: MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
Again, I think it would be interesting to see actual data on this, but my sense is that many many more people are constantly restarting with new teams/rosters and dabbling in other modes compared to those that are dedicated to progressing through 1+ seasons in the same franchise (whether playing all the games or not playing all of the games). With no data, it's really a futile exercise to debate.. Exactly as you're saying, constantly restarting and dabbling...but hoping to rectify that this year.
MLB: TORONTO BLUE JAYS
NFL: MINNESOTA VIKINGS
NHL: TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS
NBA: TORONTO RAPTORSComment
-
Re: MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
For example, Ramone in the past mentioned a coupe times that the manage-only mode literally gets used by just a couple dozen people. By your argument, there is absolutely no reason for the developers to put any resource on that mode. They certainly are not keeping MoM just as a courtesy for what Knight has done for The Show community overall...
If things do get worse, at least I know I can still play MoM and continue my team. It's what I did after my surgery and my arm was in a sling for 3 months. I'm not upset or anything, just vocalizing my support of MoM.Comment
-
Re: MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
I think this type of argument is useless to make as users in a public forum; it's is ultimately the developers who decide in which direction would be the best way for the game to move forward.
...
For example, Ramone in the past mentioned a coupe times that the manage-only mode literally gets used by just a couple dozen people. By your argument, there is absolutely no reason for the developers to put any resource on that mode. They certainly are not keeping MoM just as a courtesy for what Knight has done for The Show community overall...
...Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
Well, if you were watching some of these streams, there is the fact that Ramone himself gave us the argument for why offline franchise got more attention than online franchise this cycle. Not surprisingly it was based on the volume of users in one mode vs the other. Ramone, who you cited as among those making the decisions, is where this info is coming from in the first place. So your issue lies with that; don't shoot the messenger. It's painfully obvious that usage volume/sales will drive their development decisions.
Are you saying those gamers who are in minority or have some ideas that might not appeal to the widest (paying) audience should not voice their opinions at all, because their opinions will likely be unheard anyways?
My only point is that we as users really don't have control over prioritization/business decisions that the developers need to make, so it is pointless for us to filter in/our our opinions/feedback ourselves based on what we *think* the developers would do; at the end of the day, we don't know what the developers end up doing anyways, just as in the case of MoM which really seems very insignificant (and perhaps even a liability) from a business standpoint.
A gamer can of course provide his feedback as to what sort of game he likes to play in future. What else is the reason for the developers to spend time in those forums looking for user feedback? They will make their own decisions based on their constraints; we don't have to do it for them.
As a gamer, the best use of a public forum like OS where some devs hang around is to provide "potentially" useful feedback, so that the game gets better/stays relevant for their target user base.
Whether someone like myself remains a target user for The Show... that's not a decision I make, but it totally okay for me to discuss about what I think, as one wee user, makes the most authentic baseball simulation game.
That's my opinion, anyways.Comment
-
Re: MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)
My original point was (and is) that having ratings or not having ratings displayed in the game is basically the same thing, despite all arguments made to the contrary. And my secondary point is that I don't think the devs should use resources to install/test a new feature that is half a dozen of something we already have 6 of. Now, if it's easy to add and wouldn't hinder their 75-person team's effort, then great! Adding options like these are fine as long as the opportunity cost is small. Just my opinion...just as adding a ratings toggle = great idea, in some other opinions.
My only point is that we as users really don't have control over prioritization/business decisions that the developers need to make, so it is pointless for us to filter in/our our opinions/feedback ourselves based on what we *think* the developers would do; at the end of the day, we don't know what the developers end up doing anyways, just as in the case of MoM which really seems very insignificant (and perhaps even a liability) from a business standpoint.
A gamer can of course provide his feedback as to what sort of game he likes to play in future. What else is the reason for the developers to spend time in those forums looking for user feedback? They will make their own decisions based on their constraints; we don't have to do it for them.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
Comment