05-06-2016, 04:14 PM
|
#5
|
MVP
OVR: 31
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,261
|
At first, I thought, "Yes" because of the return you would get. However, the more I think about it, I don't think it's a good idea.
1 - The return you get for him won't nearly be what you'll get in return. You lose both short-term and long-term value.
2 - Prospects are lottery tickets, that's it, nothing more. I believe only the Dodgers would come close to giving the Angels any sort of value. (Think, Puig, Seager/Pedersen, Urias and maybe more)
3 - The Angels have TOOOOO many holes to fill that a trade of Trout couldn't fill in one trade. Not to mention one of the worst farm system in baseball.
4 - Bad contracts of Pujols (signed through 2021, has $189M left) which they backloaded, but do have CJ Wilson and Jered Weaver's contracts coming off the books this year. However, they are still paying Hamilton more than $50M to be on the DL for another team...
The Angels are just not in a good spot, and don't have much going for them in the near future. Trading Trout, in my opinion, isn't the answer.
|
|
|