I know better than your average Joe,not to go online and complain about an unfair decision.I usually dismiss instantly any simillar post.But this i believe is worth looking into.
I used to think that some decisions were unfair back in EA UFC 1,but i didn't even know how scoring worked back then,ever since i read the official UFC rules,i can safely say,i almost am never disappointed at a decision.I pretty much know by the time a game ends if i won it or lost it if it goes at a decision. And that's not taking into account the cutscenes it shows at breaks to be able to tell who won the round.
I usually make fun of people who complain about a decision,because i tend to conclude that they are ignorant of how the scoring and the octagon control works and especially since everyone in this game keeps walking backwards while holding high block,since it's too OP and too Easy to do,i tend to deny their claim of a wrong Decision from the get-go just based off on that.
That is until this happened to me. I am not sure if the other guy knew any loophole or any exploit on how to win the decision,but you can see for yourselves it's pretty ridicilous. I have an edited video uploaded along with the round score photos for those who don't want to watch it.
Overall from the stats,only thing you can think of justifying him winning, is that he might have gotten 2 close submissions which won him the round.I'll have you know that is false as you can see from the video,his submissions didn't even pass the first gate.Only 2 submissions attempted 1 in the 2nd and 1 in the 3rd,both failed without passing a single gate.
So here we go with the video:https://youtu.be/Z90aODtGtIo
And now with the photos:
Overall: http://imgur.com/l9eIY5c
R1: http://imgur.com/cspnmmt
R2: http://imgur.com/tnTjAeP
R3: http://imgur.com/ctTGbrz
Every single round,i destroy him at striking and in the first 2 rounds,striking takes place mainly on the ground/clinch,which i also dominate him. He never got a full guard/half guard/side control/full mount dominant position over me,only i did that.He did however get the dominant sprawl 2 times i believe.His submissions 0/2 successfull,both canceled before him passing the first gate. I clearly won every round,some by a little bit,some by a lot. It can be debatable that he won the 3rd round as i let him have most of the octagon control as i was messing around,since it was a quick match and i was certain i had won the first 2 rounds,because i dominated him on the ground but the stand-up was pretty equal,since he had good octagon control,but didn't do any damage unlike me,who also got a knockdown second round.
__________________________________________________ ______________________________________
EDIT 15/16/2016
watch this self explanatory video: https://youtu.be/i84YbnjK5PY
I edited it a bit and made it a bit entertaining,because that's all you can do at the end of the day on bad scenarios like these, just laugh them off.
Hope you enjoyed and please fix the broken decision system.
This fight i was dominating the ground + stand-up center of the octagon,so when i heared that, i obviously knew i won the game. Apparently not..
I used to think that some decisions were unfair back in EA UFC 1,but i didn't even know how scoring worked back then,ever since i read the official UFC rules,i can safely say,i almost am never disappointed at a decision.I pretty much know by the time a game ends if i won it or lost it if it goes at a decision. And that's not taking into account the cutscenes it shows at breaks to be able to tell who won the round.
I usually make fun of people who complain about a decision,because i tend to conclude that they are ignorant of how the scoring and the octagon control works and especially since everyone in this game keeps walking backwards while holding high block,since it's too OP and too Easy to do,i tend to deny their claim of a wrong Decision from the get-go just based off on that.
That is until this happened to me. I am not sure if the other guy knew any loophole or any exploit on how to win the decision,but you can see for yourselves it's pretty ridicilous. I have an edited video uploaded along with the round score photos for those who don't want to watch it.
Overall from the stats,only thing you can think of justifying him winning, is that he might have gotten 2 close submissions which won him the round.I'll have you know that is false as you can see from the video,his submissions didn't even pass the first gate.Only 2 submissions attempted 1 in the 2nd and 1 in the 3rd,both failed without passing a single gate.
So here we go with the video:https://youtu.be/Z90aODtGtIo
And now with the photos:
Overall: http://imgur.com/l9eIY5c
R1: http://imgur.com/cspnmmt
R2: http://imgur.com/tnTjAeP
R3: http://imgur.com/ctTGbrz
Every single round,i destroy him at striking and in the first 2 rounds,striking takes place mainly on the ground/clinch,which i also dominate him. He never got a full guard/half guard/side control/full mount dominant position over me,only i did that.He did however get the dominant sprawl 2 times i believe.His submissions 0/2 successfull,both canceled before him passing the first gate. I clearly won every round,some by a little bit,some by a lot. It can be debatable that he won the 3rd round as i let him have most of the octagon control as i was messing around,since it was a quick match and i was certain i had won the first 2 rounds,because i dominated him on the ground but the stand-up was pretty equal,since he had good octagon control,but didn't do any damage unlike me,who also got a knockdown second round.
__________________________________________________ ______________________________________
EDIT 15/16/2016
watch this self explanatory video: https://youtu.be/i84YbnjK5PY
I edited it a bit and made it a bit entertaining,because that's all you can do at the end of the day on bad scenarios like these, just laugh them off.
Hope you enjoyed and please fix the broken decision system.
This fight i was dominating the ground + stand-up center of the octagon,so when i heared that, i obviously knew i won the game. Apparently not..
Comment