Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

[extremeskins04]

I'm not so sure if I'm allowed to post this on OS or not so my apologies in advance to the mods but in this video with Sports Gamers Online a question was asked about prior features that used to be in previous installments of Madden.

Rex stated about them trying to patch in formation subs cause it used to be a feature. The part that Rex's talk about this starts at the 2:15 mark if you don't want to watch the whole video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ9-XvTmzn8

[NateDogPack12]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

Man, that was some pretty impressive assurance from Rex, there. I'm quite confident after listening to that in them getting to formation subs this year. If they ever get formation subs, best-on-best, and o-line injuries in the game, I will be PUMPED. Those things would be HUGE difference makers and add tons of enjoyment / immersion for me.

[Hooe]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

Anyone want to transcribe high points from the video? I'm out Internet access for a bit and my data plan isn't that great. Much appreciated in advance!

[NateDogPack12]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

I got you, CM.

So basically, he talks about the usual promotional material, first. The new commentary team is the real selling point for him. Before, commentary was seen in house as a meta-negative in that it was viewed negatively almost universally. They set out to change that and add life to the game.

Decisions to address gameplay elements were not hard. They had to transform a piece of tech to set up the gap assignments and that was hard. Then talked about the tuning aspect. They joke about how aggressive catch is a curse word to some. Rex says it was tuned badly and he'll own his mistakes.

Then talk about formation subs - easy to get to but just wasn't part of the plan. (WTF?) but they'll get it patched in. He says team play is more troublesome because you have to build a lobby and incorporate new WR / DB interaction to make it fun beyond just the QB position. Rex says best on best is a priority but it'll require the time to go back and shore up the flaws in alignment system. Impossible just to slap it on top due to fundamental flaws.

[DocHolliday]

Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

Any idea if concepts like "2 RB system" or a "Running back by Committee" made it in this year?

It's been about 15 years since every team ran with the workhorse back. If that ever happened.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Brooklynbks4]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

Formation subs patch 2 calling it now!!

[4thQtrStre5S]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

I got you, CM.

So basically, he talks about the usual promotional material, first. The new commentary team is the real selling point for him. Before, commentary was seen in house as a meta-negative in that it was viewed negatively almost universally. They set out to change that and add life to the game.

Decisions to address gameplay elements were not hard. They had to transform a piece of tech to set up the gap assignments and that was hard. Then talked about the tuning aspect. They joke about how aggressive catch is a curse word to some. Rex says it was tuned badly and he'll own his mistakes.

Then talk about formation subs - easy to get to but just wasn't part of the plan. (WTF?) but they'll get it patched in. He says team play is more troublesome because you have to build a lobby and incorporate new WR / DB interaction to make it fun beyond just the QB position. Rex says best on best is a priority but it'll require the time to go back and shore up the flaws in alignment system. Impossible just to slap it on top due to fundamental flaws.

Also, New Online Architecture which will -
1: Eliminate IP booting
2: Opponents Connection speed will not effect you; thus you shouldn't lag because of your opponent and their internet connection.

[Gilley]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

Any idea if concepts like "2 RB system" or a "Running back by Committee" made it in this year?

It's been about 15 years since every team ran with the workhorse back. If that ever happened.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If it's not in this year, it definitely needs to be on the list for next year. Way overdue.

[DocHolliday]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

If it's not in this year, it definitely needs to be on the list for next year. Way overdue.

To say the least. It's insane to me that this hasn't been put in the game.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[NateDogPack12]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

What specific feature are you all talking about? The HB1-HB2 slider? When you say concepts, nobody can tell the exact gameplay manifestation you want.

[4thQtrStre5S]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

Any idea if concepts like "2 RB system" or a "Running back by Committee" made it in this year?

It's been about 15 years since every team ran with the workhorse back. If that ever happened.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sounds like that would be something available if they patch in Formation subs in M17. But it wouldn't do a 2 back committee switch automatically, I assume.

You can already just set your Auto-sub slider higher for RB.

[DocHolliday]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

User teams can obviously breach this manually in many ways. I'm talking about CPU teams working a system besides the workhorse back.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Hooe]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

Sounds like that would be something available if they patch in Formation subs in M17. But it wouldn't do a 2 back committee switch automatically, I assume.

You can already just set your Auto-sub slider higher for RB.

I think the bigger thing people want is for the CPU team to recognize in-game that it doesn't have a bell-cow running back on its roster and to rotate backs on different series or drives. Formation subs doesn't fix that.

That said, I personally value formation subs over that, and if we got formation subs in a post-release update that'd be a huge win for the community in my book.

[Cowboy008]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

Sounds like there is a pretty good chance that formation subs gets patched in.

[Rams_3]

Re: Rex Dickson talks about possibly patching in Formation Subs

Sounds like there is a pretty good chance that formation subs gets patched in.

Yup and i can dig it too.