Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 4thQtrStre5S
    MVP
    • Nov 2013
    • 3051

    #16
    Re: Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

    Jim Brown is a liability to the Browns team, and football in general.

    Comment

    • reyes the roof
      Hall Of Fame
      • Mar 2009
      • 11526

      #17
      Re: Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

      I'm curious what they spend on the players that they are able to get to agree to have their likeness used. I'm sure it certainly isn't $600k per player

      Comment

      • mrprice33
        Just some guy
        • Jul 2003
        • 5986

        #18
        Re: Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

        Originally posted by reyes the roof
        I'm curious what they spend on the players that they are able to get to agree to have their likeness used. I'm sure it certainly isn't $600k per player


        Depends on the player, but that's not how that number was determined.


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • XxKnicksRules215xX
          MVP
          • Mar 2016
          • 1815

          #19
          Originally posted by dk6663
          Jim Browns Net Worth is 50 Million.......Good for him, really ?
          Yup good for him, I am not mad at him.

          Comment

          • redsox4evur
            Hall Of Fame
            • Jul 2013
            • 18169

            #20
            Re: Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

            Good he deserves it according to US Law.


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
            Follow me on Twitter

            Comment

            • CujoMatty
              Member of Rush Nation
              • Oct 2007
              • 5445

              #21
              I couldn't care less about EA having to pay. Whatever .
              My bigger problem is why did Jim brown not want his likeness in the game in the first place and why would you care at all if they made a generic player like you and put it in a game ? Money grab doesn't make sense if he really is worth 50 million. Just seems kind of a slap in the face to browns fans who would like to play as him . if they portrayed him doing something derogatory OK ya but all they did was make him awesome at football how uptight do you have to be?
              2016 NLL Champion Saskatchewan Rush
              2018 NLL Champion Saskatchewan Rush
              2019 CEBL Champion Saskatchewan Rattlers

              Comment

              • reyes the roof
                Hall Of Fame
                • Mar 2009
                • 11526

                #22
                Re: Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

                Originally posted by mrprice33
                Depends on the player, but that's not how that number was determined.


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                How was it determined? I'm not going to pretend I know anything about the law, but I would imagine if he isn't asking for something comparable to what he should get if he were in the game then the lawsuit would be a bit frivolous

                Comment

                • kehlis
                  Moderator
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 27738

                  #23
                  Re: Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

                  Originally posted by reyes the roof
                  How was it determined? I'm not going to pretend I know anything about the law, but I would imagine if he isn't asking for something comparable to what he should get if he were in the game then the lawsuit would be a bit frivolous
                  It was the settlement amount so it's the amount EA offered him to get him to drop the lawsuit.

                  Comment

                  • Big FN Deal
                    Banned
                    • Aug 2011
                    • 5993

                    #24
                    Re: Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

                    I know it shouldn't but the stuff I read from individuals against other individuals in favor of corporations surprises me every time. Mean ole' Jim Brown picking on poor lil' EA for using his likeness anyway after he told them they couldn't. Yeah it's all about Jim Brown and how he should be honored that EA would want to represent him in their game even after he declined, no need to sue for that, it's not like it's against the law or anything.

                    The responses in thread like this strike a sour cord with me, EA lost because they were deemed to have illegally used Jim Brown's likeness, among others, this isn't some one off case or misunderstanding this has been proven to be what EA did, repeatedly.

                    Comment

                    • XxKnicksRules215xX
                      MVP
                      • Mar 2016
                      • 1815

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Big FN Deal
                      I know it shouldn't but the stuff I read from individuals against other individuals in favor of corporations surprises me every time. Mean ole' Jim Brown picking on poor lil' EA for using his likeness anyway after he told them they couldn't. Yeah it's all about Jim Brown and how he should be honored that EA would want to represent him in their game even after he declined, no need to sue for that, it's not like it's against the law or anything.

                      The responses in thread like this strike a sour cord with me, EA lost because they were deemed to have illegally used Jim Brown's likeness, among others, this isn't some one off case or misunderstanding this has been proven to be what EA did, repeatedly.
                      Preach, I always have a suspicion about those who take it personal about a person they've never met and a story that's only being half told but hey who am I, I'll leave it at that, take care and God bless.

                      Comment

                      • Junior Moe
                        MVP
                        • Jul 2009
                        • 3869

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Big FN Deal
                        I know it shouldn't but the stuff I read from individuals against other individuals in favor of corporations surprises me every time. Mean ole' Jim Brown picking on poor lil' EA for using his likeness anyway after he told them they couldn't. Yeah it's all about Jim Brown and how he should be honored that EA would want to represent him in their game even after he declined, no need to sue for that, it's not like it's against the law or anything.

                        The responses in thread like this strike a sour cord with me, EA lost because they were deemed to have illegally used Jim Brown's likeness, among others, this isn't some one off case or misunderstanding this has been proven to be what EA did, repeatedly.
                        Yeah. I don't get the Jim Brown hate, either. EA screwed up here. They could have just as easily made his stock avatar nothing like him at all (number, physical meausrement, etc.) and just allowed editing. That way they are absolved of responsibility. It's the same thing with O'Bannon. It sucks, and I hate him for the loss of college football and basketball games. But right is right. Those avatars were dead ringers for their collegiate counterparts.

                        Comment

                        • kehlis
                          Moderator
                          • Jul 2008
                          • 27738

                          #27
                          Re: Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

                          All other arguments aside and just speaking to this case I have a big issue with what EA did and hold nothing against Brown.

                          At the time there were no concerns over uses of likeness as there are today. They went out of their way to ask if they could use him and despite being told no decided to do so anyway. There is no defense for that.

                          I can't put myself in his shoes or know why he said no (and I don't think I would have) but I absolutely side on him with this and was pretty surprised when this case was initially dismissed.

                          Comment

                          • redsox4evur
                            Hall Of Fame
                            • Jul 2013
                            • 18169

                            #28
                            Re: Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

                            Originally posted by kehlis
                            All other arguments aside and just speaking to this case I have a big issue with what EA did and hold nothing against Brown.

                            At the time there were no concerns over uses of likeness as there are today. They went out of their way to ask if they could use him and despite being told no decided to do so anyway. There is no defense for that.

                            I can't put myself in his shoes or know why he said no (and I don't think I would have) but I absolutely side on him with this and was pretty surprised when this case was initially dismissed.
                            Wow I had no idea that this case was initially dismissed, how did that happen? It seems like a pretty open and shut case, IMO.

                            Now would I have exactly what Brown did it depends on my situation, honestly. If I am one of those broke athletes like Antoine Walker, Vince Young, etc. hell yea I will take on any money I can get. But if I am like Brown (net worth $50 million) it depends on how I feel about the NFL and their treatment of retirees, which the main reason why Barkley won't do any NBA, supposedly. But in the end I would probably say yea go ahead and just send me a check in July or something.
                            Follow me on Twitter

                            Comment

                            • 4thQtrStre5S
                              MVP
                              • Nov 2013
                              • 3051

                              #29
                              Re: Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

                              Originally posted by Junior Moe
                              Yeah. I don't get the Jim Brown hate, either. EA screwed up here. They could have just as easily made his stock avatar nothing like him at all (number, physical meausrement, etc.) and just allowed editing. That way they are absolved of responsibility. It's the same thing with O'Bannon. It sucks, and I hate him for the loss of college football and basketball games. But right is right. Those avatars were dead ringers for their collegiate counterparts.
                              I think many people dislike Jim Brown for what he has been since retiring from Football, and thus anything involving Jim is looked down on;

                              from my perspective, and as Knute Rockne proved with the Four Horsemen, the individual on a team is what they are, for the most part, because of the team around them first. This in no way suggests that there are no way individually better players; just that it takes more than the individual in a team sports, to make the team worth anything.

                              I think having any likeness of Jim Brown in MAdden was bad, because Jim seems to love nothing more than to promote himself.

                              Comment

                              • Rocky
                                All Star
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 6896

                                #30
                                Re: Jim Brown Receives $600K Settlement Against EA

                                Originally posted by 4thQtrStre5S
                                I think many people dislike Jim Brown for what he has been since retiring from Football, and thus anything involving Jim is looked down on;

                                from my perspective, and as Knute Rockne proved with the Four Horsemen, the individual on a team is what they are, for the most part, because of the team around them first. This in no way suggests that there are no way individually better players; just that it takes more than the individual in a team sports, to make the team worth anything.

                                I think having any likeness of Jim Brown in MAdden was bad, because Jim seems to love nothing more than to promote himself.
                                C'mon man . He's probably the greatest football player of all time. He can't possibly be bad for the game.

                                Jim Brown probably wanted to be paid more than any other player in the game. That's his prerogative and I don't necessarily disagree with him.
                                "Maybe I can't win. But to beat me, he's going to have to kill me. And to kill me, he's gonna have to have the heart to stand in front of me. And to do that, he's got to be willing to die himself. I don't know if he's ready to do that."
                                -Rocky Balboa

                                Comment

                                Working...