Recommended Videos
Collapse
Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
No Lacy? Boycotting M17!!!
Seriously though, I hope they bumped up his speed, he lost 20-25 lbs in order to become quicker and faster. His playing weight will be right around 220-225, as opposed to the 250 (generously) he was at last year. I think he will have a Lynch type impact for us this year.Green Bay PackersSeattle MarinersNew York Rangers
Syracuse Orange
If walls could talk to spill the lies, we'd see the world through devils eyes
-M. ShadowsComment
-
Re: Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
For a short stint, you had HOF Favre at QB and one win from the SB.No problem. You couldn't pay me to attempt to tackle the guy (as cool as it would be to be able to say I got steam rolled by one of the greatest). Vikings fans will always passionately argue for AP because for years we've never had a real QB or passing attack. AP has had the team on his back since he came into the league. Can you just imagine what a team like the Patriots or Packers would have been like over the last decade with a back like AP?Comment
-
Re: Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
Well Packers did have Green, for quite a few years while Favre was in his prime. Many forget Green was a top 3 HB in the early to mid 00's, even having an 1800 yard 70 catch season. Was he on AP's level, probably not, but it's something. Rodgers has never really had a consistent run game till Lacy's 1st two seasons. Also, let's not forget Brady has had good backs as well, Corey Dillon anyone? But ever so often I wonder what could've been had the Packers drafted Barry Sanders instead of that lineman who shall remain nameless. We probably would have won 3-5 SB's in the 90's with Favre and Barry.No problem. You couldn't pay me to attempt to tackle the guy (as cool as it would be to be able to say I got steam rolled by one of the greatest). Vikings fans will always passionately argue for AP because for years we've never had a real QB or passing attack. AP has had the team on his back since he came into the league. Can you just imagine what a team like the Patriots or Packers would have been like over the last decade with a back like AP?Last edited by Godgers12; 07-22-2016, 06:01 PM.Green Bay PackersSeattle MarinersNew York Rangers
Syracuse Orange
If walls could talk to spill the lies, we'd see the world through devils eyes
-M. ShadowsComment
-
Re: Madden 17 TOP 5 Rated Running Backs
100% AGREE!!!The biggest problem isn't that Bell is rated higher (I feel AP should be #1 no question but I will admit AP is only a true runner, while LB is a receiver and blocker), but that AP is a 91. For years he's put the team on his back and dominated. Everyone said that last year he would regress because of his age but he showed that he still has it. He should be a 95 Minimum.Comment
-
Re: Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
Gurley and Freeman are definitely better than Miller. I would even throw Jonathan Stewart in the category of running backs better than Miller. Miller would suffice at a 85 overall, in my opinion.Comment
-
Re: Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
I was at or watched on TV, every game that Barry played. Barry on turf was absolutely amazing with an uncanny ability to juke, start and stop and then accelerate past helpless defenders but Barry on grass was a totally different player. He didn't have that same electric ability to make them miss on grass, like he did on turf so I don't think he would have made as great as impact for GB like he did for Detroit.
Barry wasn't a one cut and run through the hole player, his game was dancing behind the LOS and looking for the home run play which often resulted in many negative yard carries. He also wasn't a good pass catcher or blocker which would also diminish his value in a West Coast offensive scheme. However, as a pure running back, he probably had no peer, maybe Gale Sayers but I never saw him play live.Comment
-
Re: Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
As a Viks fan, if the ratings are properly overhauled, he should be a 91. He doesn't block all that well and not a good receiving RB. Higher overalls should mean the player is an all out threat in every aspect of his position.No problem. You couldn't pay me to attempt to tackle the guy (as cool as it would be to be able to say I got steam rolled by one of the greatest). Vikings fans will always passionately argue for AP because for years we've never had a real QB or passing attack. AP has had the team on his back since he came into the league. Can you just imagine what a team like the Patriots or Packers would have been like over the last decade with a back like AP?Comment
-
Re: Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
You're seeing the top guys, and yet you think nothing has been stretched out because your expecting low ratings for top tier players?I'm not really concerned about ratings because I'll change them as I see fit but am a little surprised that more people don't express the feeling of being deceived by the calculation of the overall rating being lower despite all attributes in general being higher.
I know the tuning of the game makes a difference but we are taught, to look at a players individual attributes not the overall yet are told how great it is that the overalls are a few points lower than before.I don't really see how that helps anything.
😦Please take note that most of what I say and post is made in satire.
Follow me on twitter @Equipment_GuruComment
-
Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
I think he's concerned that the only thing that seems changed is how the overall is calculated to get a lower number but, the individual ratings seem the same if not higher.
If that's true then what's the point of the so called stretched out ratings?
If a 86 overall this year would have been a 92 with the same ratings last year what has changed other than how the overall is calculated?
To be clear I like the new way it's being calculated. Seems to give a more clear number.Last edited by charter04; 07-22-2016, 09:42 PM.Comment
-
Re: Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
We have done both, more was done to the overall to give a better representation of what that player truly is and we have spread the ratings some as well, it's a two part system, we didn't drop everyone by 10-20 points or anything.I think he's concerned that the only thing that seems changed is how the overall is calculated to get a lower number but, the individual ratings seem the same if not higher.
If that's true then what's the point of the so called stretched out ratings?
If a 86 overall this year would have been a 92 with the same ratings last year what has changed other than how the overall is calculated?
To be clear I like the new way it's being calculated. Seems to give a more clear number.Please take note that most of what I say and post is made in satire.
Follow me on twitter @Equipment_GuruComment
-
Re: Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
I'm actually really disappointed that Martin and Miller are above Gurley and Freeman. Gurley is obvious but I actually think for the time Freeman was healthy and played, the numbers he put up were ridiculous (he was beating AP early in the season in stats and it took some time for anyone to take second after AP surpassed him even when he was injured). So those two omitted from the list is very surprising to me.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
Comment
-
best running back is adrian peterson period... adrian peterson can carry a team le'veon bell can'tComment
-
Re: Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
I said nothing about stretched out ratings or expecting lower ratings.Charter gets my point about the higher player attributes but lower overall.I don't know what's behind the calculation but I'm not naive enough to be excited about it either because I know not to only look at a players overall.Many do though and they'll be the ones to say how great it is that we don't have as many 90+.
I'm not saying the ratings are bad or haven't improved to a degree with being stretched out or that anyone isn't doing something right.Not many people will agree with all ratings or ways of doing things so at least it's at our discretion this year.Comment
-
Re: Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
Awesome. that's great to here. I overall like the way it's looking and hope we get some ratings guide or something at some point.
It's great to have you guys involved with the community on here and Twitter.Comment

Comment