 |
Quote: |
 |
|
|
 |
Originally Posted by BreakingBad2013 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's my point. I prefer a spread. I'd like to see a 0-100 scale. But looking at the top 5 WRs, there are another 6 or 7, maybe even 8 or 9 that have to be up there. I think ratings will again be inflated, because they try to fit all of the NFL players from about 55/60-99. Where it should be 1-99. Especially squeezing 2200 or so players into 39 rating numbers. That gives you 57 players per rating number.
From our Madden experiences we look at some 70s as starters based on their skills. Imagine having:
Tom Brady 94
Matt Ryan 76
Sam Bradford 66
Kevin Kolb 43
Jamarcus Russel 13
Or something like:
Darrell REVIS 90
Jason Varrett 75
Jalen Ramsay 62
Dimitri Patterson 48
Etc.
You'd have a legit amount of super stars, feeling elite. And bums would be bums, huge liabilities.
Imagine the draft impact of you draft a 21 overall player first round, and pickup a 67 overall in the 6th round!
Overalls:
0-10 can't even get a tryout
11-20 project, has physical tools, just not technical or intangibles.
21-30 practice squad project
31-40 bench player
41-50 fringe starter
51-60 average starter
61-70 solid starter, just really solid in what he does.
71-80 really good player, not HOF caliber, but Pro bowl potential
81-89 Excellent player, just right under HOF, consistent All Pro, just not ground breaking
90+ First ballot HOF
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
I am all for wider ratings but this is too wide. It would make the superstar too powerful because you would likely be able to throw to that receiver nearly every time.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk