View Single Post
Old 02-23-2017, 08:09 PM   #7721
Clubbs
Rookie
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jan 2017
Re: Flazko's True NFL Realism Sliders (Madden 17)

So yeah. That time I said I'd never have as low scoring game as 14-10 against the Giants or whatever it was...


Score
SF: 0 - 2 - 3 - 6 = 11
IND: 0 - 0 - 7 - 0 = 7

Yards
SF: 105 Rush, 202 Pass, 307 Off, 134 Punt Ret, 66 Kick Ret, 507 Total
DAL: 148 Rush, 182 Pass, 330 Off, 14 Punt Ret, 0 Kick Ret, 344 Total

Passing
SF: Downey - 31/43, 202 yards, 3 Ints, 52.7
DAL: Prescott - 18/35, 199 yards, 1 Int, 1 Int, 56.7

Rushing
SF: Hyde - 24 Carries, 82 yards, 3.4avg
DAL: Elliott - 18 Carries, 128 yards, 1 TD, 1 Fum 7.1avg

Defense
SF: 5 TFL, 3 Sack, 1 Int, 1 FF, 1 FFRec
DAL: 5 TFL, 0 Sacks, 3 Ints, 0 FF


Penalties
SF: 4 - 12 yards
DAL: 9 - 65 yards

56 tackling is just right. Allows teams to get the run game going. I had a higher scoring game when tackling was 58 which was weird. Both teams struggled in the passing game. Players were closely covered.

Two of my interceptions were ridiculous picks by Scandrick. The other was a deflection. I could have had 3 picks. But 28 interceptions means they only catch the hard ones so may want to put it at 30 again. If I do that, I may want QB accuracy on CPU on 7. Prescott struggled after a good start.

Two of my picks came on around the 30 of the Cowboys half. Cowboys fumble came on my 25. If they didn't occur the score could have been higher.

Lowering the tackling as I stated seems to lower block shedding. Which meant I had fewer and a more realistic amount of sacks.
Clubbs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove