I think so. There's a lot of contradiction that goes on.
They seem to want ratings to matter but user input to also trump it at the same time. So if that's the case why choose Aaron Rodgers over Tebow? Ratings say Tebow should be inaccurate as hell but user input says you made the right choice so the ball should go exactly where you want it to.
And if it's not all or nothing there's always going to be the conflict where one player feels like they're getting screwed by the random kind of stuff even if the ratings or situation dictate that it's something that should happen. The guy yesterday was complaining the whole game that his receivers kept dropping passes and by the way he was talking probably felt like he got screwed but also ignores that a lot of the dropped passes he felt he deserved to catch were balls thrown into triple coverage where his guy just gets destroyed and pinballed around.


Comment