[Find_the_Door]

Quote: Originally Posted by XtremeDunkz

That would be correct. I honestly do feel like there's a Packer bias. I've always said one person in charge of ratings is a bad idea. Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

I disagree - I see him fairly rated. He's always been a player that's extremely inconsistent. An 89 catch rating is very generous for him in my opinion - you can see they tried to reflect that in him having lower catch in traffic, spectacular catch ratings.

He's always been an okay run blocker - aside from that he's got one of the leagues worst personalities, and checks out of games often.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk