Why are 2007 Cavs rated higher than 2013 Heat?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Why are 2007 Cavs rated higher than 2013 Heat?
I don't understand the ratings for the classic teams. The rating for the 2007 Cavs and the 2007 Warriors are also much higher than the one for the 1996 Bulls. It seems that the ratings for the classic teams were just randomly put together. -
Re: Why are 2007 Cavs rated higher than 2013 Heat?
I was just looking at the ratings for the 2012 Knicks team and I had to lol.
Carmelo is an 88 overall with 2 bronze badges while a washed up Baron Davis gets 19 badges with 5 of them being gold.Comment
-
Re: Why are 2007 Cavs rated higher than 2013 Heat?
Ratings for classic teams are embarrassing
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: Why are 2007 Cavs rated higher than 2013 Heat?
Apparently the devs are aware of the lack of badges on classic and all-time teams and it's being fixed.Chicago Bulls | Chicago Bears | Chicago White Sox | Chicago BlackhawksComment
-
Re: Why are 2007 Cavs rated higher than 2013 Heat?
Lol. The 2007 Cavs rating is just insane. I'm curious as to how they came up with it.Comment
-
Re: Why are 2007 Cavs rated higher than 2013 Heat?
Hopefully they can re-order the teams for PNO.
Its crazy that these dud classic teams are in a tier above the current GSW.
Teams should be spread throughout.Comment
-
Re: Why are 2007 Cavs rated higher than 2013 Heat?
This is because of the unrealistic coaches grades, you can change them in the roster. Just put the 95 Bulls coach ratings to all As and the team overall will definitely go way upLast edited by DancyHercules3; 09-17-2017, 11:24 AM.Comment

Comment