[tdawg3782]

Quote: Originally Posted by Trojan Man

Cool. I'm assuming you are interpreting physical ratings as SPD/ACC/AGI/JMP, etc., and that intangible ratings would include everything from AWR/PRC to MCV/ZCV, PUR, etc. Does that sound right, or are you thinking of it differently?

Yep pretty much. I've always interpreted PHY/INT as this:

PHY
STR
AGI
SPD
ACC
JMP
THP
KPW

INT
AWR
CTH
CAR
PBK
RBK
BCV
SFA
SPM
JKM
IBK
SPC
CIT
RTE
RLS
TAS
TAM
TAD
TOR
PAC
KAC
TAK
PMV
FMV
BSH
PUR
PRC
MCV
ZCV
PRS

Attributes that could go either way IMO
TRK
ELU
POW

The way I break it down is if it can be coached or not. I don't feel any of the attributes under the PHY group can be taught. All the attributes under the INT group can be taught IMO. The last group can go either way but I'm inclined to lean more towards the PHY group for those three. Can you really teach a guy to truck better, be more elusive, or hit harder? But again it's really user preference. Anyways that's how I look at it.