[roadman]

Quote: Originally Posted by Thunderhorse

This is literally insane, because "Game Changers" have been "positive" feedback sources and we still see where the product is. The other side is probably insane too. It's not like any legitimate change has been seen from that campaign either. The difference is (at least IMO) by demanding accountability and pointing out EA's blatantly unacceptable shortcomings, they are showing the market there is a desire for something different within the niche. Ultimately, we all know money talks in this arena. The only thing that will encourage Madden to legitimately change is someone else messing with their money. Being "Yes Men" for EA does not and never has (this can be considered a historical fact at this point) worked. We are actually seeing other football games being developed. They are nowhere near the point that they can be considered legitimate competitors, but they are out there because people are recognizing there is a desire for something different. It wasn't like that 5 years ago.

I haven't followed the GCers program for several years, so, I can't tell you if they have influenced some changes with Madden or not.

All we are trying to do is become more of a presence on Twitter because it appears that the User vs CPU players aren't represented as much as the H2H players.

We aren't trying to set the world on fire, but trying to suggest User vs CPU improvements and so far, we like the results that we are seeing in it's infancy.