[Kingslayer04]

Quote: Originally Posted by RomeroXVII

What determines a fighters rating? Does it come down to the moveset? Does it comedown to the moveset+stats? Because I'm sure many people have been wondering what determines what. Fighters like, Dustin Poirier and Anthony Pettis are both considered B+s in the game, but comparing OVRS: Pettis: 91 Striking 88 Grappling 86 Stam 87 Health Poirier 91 Striking 89 Grappling 91 Stam 91 Health And if you really go into detail, stat for stat Dustin in Superior in nearly everything. Let's take a look at another weight class Chael Sonnen, a C+ has these ratings 86 Striking 92 Grappling 91 Stam 88 Health Göhkan Saki, a B has these ratings 91 Striking 81 Grappling. Damn near the lowest of the low. 86 Stam. (With 89 Striking Stamina, one point higher than Sonnen's despite coming from a much more heralded background in striking and going multiple rounds in K-1) 87 Health What makes Sonnen a C+? Because looking at his stats, moveset, clinch moveset, next to say Pettis, he'd be a B+ for sure What makes Saki a B? Aside from striking, the man's stats clearly warrant him being a C+ more than Sonnen for sure. Let's look at another weight class Israel Adesanya 91 Striking 85 Grappling 88 Stam (Personally I believe his striking Stamina should be much higher) 89 Health Paulo Costa 90 Striking 86 Grappling 89 Stam 90 Health Yet, Costa is rated a B and Adesanya is rated an A. Comparing their stats next to each other, I can't see why Adesanya is not a B as well. Or why either wouldn't be B+s at most. I want to hear everybody's thoughts on this, and I would like for aholbert to chime in on this as well.

It could be purely arbitrary and not a computation resulting from the stats.