<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/oavMDfVGlu4" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Earlier it was Harden so I was ok with it after some thought--IMO good shooters should have leeway...thats ok IMO. Kinda like Klay does below. And on a sidenote: This is why I prefer for most of this stuff to be under-the-hood. Any other year i'm blissfully unaware that his release was THIS BAD. But who knows, maybe we can help the devs better tune now that we see so much.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/BcGJ2VqoSJM" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
IMO Some of the randomness of the shot system is good. It makes the game organic and unscripted....but should a shot's success from this bad a shooter need better criteria? Maybe it can only go in with a SLIGHTLY or EXCELLENT release. Tell me what you guys think.....

Comment