Qucik Franchise question

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • niftyjets
    MVP
    • Jul 2002
    • 1861

    #1

    Qucik Franchise question

    I know they said the improved draft logic would work in existing franchises. Has anyone noticed an improvement?

    Thanks
  • BTG
    Banned
    • Jun 2003
    • 577

    #2
    Re: Qucik Franchise question

    Well, I did a draft last night. Washington didn't have a QB on their roster but still waited til the third round to finally land a 68 OVR from UGA (Newman, maybe ... don't watch college these days). Anyway, their backup is Josh Rosen. *eye roll*

    I'd say they'd still win the East, but the Giants drafted Trask in the 2nd. He's a 72. So is Jones. I can't blast this. This makes sense.

    One thing you have to watch out for is starting with prior injuries on. I watched the Cowboys take Wilson with their 1st because 86 OVR Dak was still injured. That was a waste of two hours...

    Comment

    • niftyjets
      MVP
      • Jul 2002
      • 1861

      #3
      Re: Qucik Franchise question

      I am very curious to see if it makes a big difference. I also hope they get mouthpieces to be edited in existing franchises like they said

      Comment

      • weaklandwarrior
        Rookie
        • Jun 2011
        • 48

        #4
        Re: Qucik Franchise question

        Draft logic is still the same. 1st round qbs fall to 2nd and 3rd rounds.


        Sent from my iPad using Operation Sports

        Comment

        • billyboy316
          Pro
          • Apr 2009
          • 710

          #5
          Re: Qucik Franchise question

          I know there was a glitch that had both the Bengals and Cowboys drafting QBs in the first round of the 2021 draft. Not sure if that had been fixed or not.

          I still see first round talent falling to the second round. I have also seen teams drafting players a few rounds earlier than projected. Once scouted a 6th round MLB with 1st round talent. He was snagged up in the early 3rd round. Ticked me off because I wanted him but was still nice to see.

          Comment

          • PhillyPhanatic14
            MVP
            • Jun 2015
            • 4825

            #6
            Re: Qucik Franchise question

            Originally posted by BTG
            Well, I did a draft last night. Washington didn't have a QB on their roster but still waited til the third round to finally land a 68 OVR from UGA (Newman, maybe ... don't watch college these days). Anyway, their backup is Josh Rosen. *eye roll*

            I'd say they'd still win the East, but the Giants drafted Trask in the 2nd. He's a 72. So is Jones. I can't blast this. This makes sense.

            One thing you have to watch out for is starting with prior injuries on. I watched the Cowboys take Wilson with their 1st because 86 OVR Dak was still injured. That was a waste of two hours...
            This stuff is so annoying. It's such an easy fix for the devs. All injuries from the previous season need to just be wiped on WK #1 of the offseason. That's not technically the most "realistic" thing, but Madden heals all players in the offseason anyway, so they should just do this simple move to prevent dumb roster management by the CPU.

            Comment

            • cjhawk03
              Rookie
              • Mar 2010
              • 73

              #7
              Re: Qucik Franchise question

              You will want to start with pre existing injuries off to avoid cinci and Dallas taking qb round 1


              Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

              Comment

              • patsfan1625
                Just started!
                • Oct 2019
                • 2

                #8
                Re: Qucik Franchise question

                In my recently new franchise after the update, the Bengals drafted Justin Fields at 10. I think this could be because Burrow was still injured, but still.

                Comment

                • webbjay82
                  Rookie
                  • Oct 2017
                  • 496

                  #9
                  Re: Qucik Franchise question

                  Originally posted by PhillyPhanatic14
                  This stuff is so annoying. It's such an easy fix for the devs. All injuries from the previous season need to just be wiped on WK #1 of the offseason. That's not technically the most "realistic" thing, but Madden heals all players in the offseason anyway, so they should just do this simple move to prevent dumb roster management by the CPU.

                  All they have to do is have the CPU look at its actual roster instead of depth chart when drafting.

                  Comment

                  Working...