Thread
:
Continued Updates vs Overall Quality
View Single Post
05-25-2021, 04:57 PM
#
5
Granbyroll
Rookie
OVR: 0
Join Date: Nov 2020
Re: Continued Updates vs Overall Quality
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Blackman316
Though they've managed to update EAUFC3 significantly, I'm more a fan for keeping your product intact. Fix the bugs (ffs), maybe add some content (paid DLC or not), actualize it. But don't change things too much.
Any damage to your audience has most likely been done at release. You're better off to release a new game the next year, unless your release what a nightmare (which, in the case of EAUFC, has never happened imho). Plus you alienate people who tried your game through the demo and bought it based entirely on that trial.
I once gave the - albeit ridiculous - example of Waterson's hair being changed. Its significance might be very limited, but that's what I'm talking about
: don't change existing content. Yes, this qualifies as actualization, but I'm talking about the end result: a hair piece being deleted from the game files. This should be a no-go for devs. It's the same thing as maps being removed from shooters. It's the principle.
Hair peices dont mean anything to me if the gameplay is lacking in critical areas. They took a whole position away(double unders) rather have that then hair
Granbyroll
Visit Granbyroll's Arena
Send a private message to Granbyroll
Find More Posts by Granbyroll
Advertisements - Register to remove