Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

[kzdwfy]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

WR catch is the slider that balances the off target throws.

I've been testing it between 42-45.

For example QBA 5 + WR Catch 45

That is really good combination on AA level especially for skilled players

Do you verify in practice mode or do you have to play games for verification. I will try this out and see what happens

Also, did you see these changes also take place with the CPU as well?

[CoachCot]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

Just played my home game (Indiana) vs Washington. Both of us ranked. Had good results I think. I started 1 for 9 due to off target throws and good plays by their DBs. Classic passing is definitely the move. Had the accuracy slider at 40 for both.

[Playmakers]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

Do you verify in practice mode or do you have to play games for verification. I will try this out and see what happens

Also, did you see these changes also take place with the CPU as well?

I been testing the following settings for both User and CPU on All American in play Now games.

CLASSIC PASSING
QBA 5
WR Catch 45

The game plays different outside of practice mode.

The Accuracy Slider also helps the pass defense for both USER and CPU.

[HealthyScratch]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

Something that crossed my mind earlier, do we know if sliders at default 50 is the setting that makes players play closest to their ratings?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kzdwfy]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

Something that crossed my mind earlier, do we know if sliders at default 50 is the setting that makes players play closest to their ratings?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would say yes. I have gone back to default AA to get original gameplay. My theory for inaccurate passes after all my testing is that EA has defined an innacurate pass as a throw behind the receiver or one that slows him down. So, as you decrease the slider, you get the same amount of overthrows which is maybe (and Im being generous) 1 every 10 to 20 passes, but you do see the ball consistently thrown behind the receiver (but always catchable) on crossing routes or out routes.

If they are not going to increase overthrows or off target throws, I'll deal with it this year because they are yousing knockouts or swats from the DB when the ball is thrown behind the WR to decrease the completion percentages of the QB this year.

Default AA was still a nice challenge, Ive been blown out, blown out teams, had to come from behind, etc. So this level is perfect until I can read coverages better (and faster). Then back to Heisman. Then I will adjust sliders if its all too easy on Heisman or All-American if I feel like HEisman is too unrealsitic

By the @Playmakers, I tried Acc 5, CTH 45; Acc 5, CTH 40 and 30, and I would see an overthrow or 2 but I dis not see enough over throws per game. For example, I was expecting at least 1 overthow every 10 throws for a QB with 90 SAC or above. Are you seeing these things. If not, no worries, Ill stick to default AA until later

[bill891]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

I been testing the following settings for both User and CPU on All American in play Now games.

CLASSIC PASSING
QBA 5
WR Catch 45

The game plays different outside of practice mode.

The Accuracy Slider also helps the pass defense for both USER and CPU.

Are you guys seeing yards per completion come down as you set QB accuracy so low? I’m a CPU vs CPU player wrestling with some of the same issues, but in Madden, for example, the QBA slider sometimes seems more like a downfield throw aggression setting more than an accuracy setting. Have you experienced that with this game?

[Playmakers]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

I would say yes. I have gone back to default AA to get original gameplay. My theory for inaccurate passes after all my testing is that EA has defined an innacurate pass as a throw behind the receiver or one that slows him down. So, as you decrease the slider, you get the same amount of overthrows which is maybe (and Im being generous) 1 every 10 to 20 passes, but you do see the ball consistently thrown behind the receiver (but always catchable) on crossing routes or out routes.

If they are not going to increase overthrows or off target throws, I'll deal with it this year because they are yousing knockouts or swats from the DB when the ball is thrown behind the WR to decrease the completion percentages of the QB this year.

Default AA was still a nice challenge, Ive been blown out, blown out teams, had to come from behind, etc. So this level is perfect until I can read coverages better (and faster). Then back to Heisman. Then I will adjust sliders if its all too easy on Heisman or All-American if I feel like HEisman is too unrealsitic

By the @Playmakers, I tried Acc 5, CTH 45; Acc 5, CTH 40 and 30, and I would see an overthrow or 2 but I dis not see enough over throws per game. For example, I was expecting at least 1 overthow every 10 throws for a QB with 90 SAC or above. Are you seeing these things. If not, no worries, Ill stick to default AA until later

Yep I saw it last night with Ewers of Texas

I posted an updated AA set for play now mode on the last page of my thread.

You have to use those exact settings

I actually had catch at 45 but raised it to 50 because the Wr's catch in traffic ratings for CPU helped them out more

The overall feel for the game is going to move really smooth

[benton32]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

does revamped passing make any difference for the AI passing ?

[kzdwfy]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

Yep I saw it last night with Ewers of Texas

I posted an updated AA set for play now mode on the last page of my thread.

You have to use those exact settings

I actually had catch at 45 but raised it to 50 because the Wr's catch in traffic ratings for CPU helped them out more

The overall feel for the game is going to move really smooth

I will definitely try the 5 and 45 in my dynasty games moving forward on classic passing. Thanks for the info

On another note, once I went back to default All American, I started to see overthrows by the CPU QB lol, but still none from my Human Qb and I was using revamped.

And on another note, I'm absolutely loving the game regardless of if I finally get what I want with playmakers recommendation or not. They did a fantastic job with this game and of course there's room for improvement, but I'm very impressed by what was done with college football 25

[kzdwfy]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

Yep I saw it last night with Ewers of Texas

I posted an updated AA set for play now mode on the last page of my thread.

You have to use those exact settings

I actually had catch at 45 but raised it to 50 because the Wr's catch in traffic ratings for CPU helped them out more

The overall feel for the game is going to move really smooth

Those setting worked during the dynasty game. Had 3 overthrows from the CPU FCS QB and 1 underthrow from my star Kansas QB at the beginning of the game...Loved it!!!!

Definitely seeing a difference between QBs now lol.

Thanks @Playmakers

[Playmakers]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

Those setting worked during the dynasty game. Had 3 overthrows from the CPU FCS QB and 1 underthrow from my star Kansas QB at the beginning of the game...Loved it!!!!

Definitely seeing a difference between QBs now lol.

Thanks @Playmakers

Awesome man that's good to hear especially since you tested in Dynasty mode

Army QB was terrible with those settings in my last test game.

Hopefully when EA drops a patch the QB accuracy becomes a priority because these college kids shouldn't be slinging the ball all over the field without any off target passes.

[canes21]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

I'll have to try 5 on Heisman to see if it for some reason works. At 0 I'm still not seeing the CPU miss much at all which almost makes it feel like the slider just about doesn't work.

[floridagatorsfan2001]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

Have u tested lower player minimum speed thresholds yet?

Sent from my SM-A716U using Tapatalk

[Playmakers]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

Have u tested lower player minimum speed thresholds yet?

Sent from my SM-A716U using Tapatalk

From what I've seen the lower thresholds make the animations look better

I played with 95 threshold and just seems like the game speeds up more which renders sped up animations that at times don't look as smooth.

Then I decided to check the player ratings for acceleration of all players.

I noticed the default rosters had the lowest acceleration rating at 45

So then put the player speed parity at 45 and to my surprise the game speed slowed down. The animations looked more clear and not all players were taking off at the same time as if they were all shot out of a cannon.

Everything moved butter smooth for me on All Pro and Varsity

You can actually see foot planting and stop and go moves by RB's. They actually have enough time to use their Chang of direction ratings.

There's actually still good separation amongst the players speed and big plays are still about the same as it would be on higher threshold

[HealthyScratch]

Re: Hum/CPU QB Inaccuracy Find

From what I've seen the lower thresholds make the animations look better

I played with 95 threshold and just seems like the game speeds up more which renders sped up animations that at times don't look as smooth.

Then I decided to check the player ratings for acceleration of all players.

I noticed the default rosters had the lowest acceleration rating at 45

So then put the player speed parity at 45 and to my surprise the game speed slowed down. The animations looked more clear and not all players were taking off at the same time as if they were all shot out of a cannon.

Everything moved butter smooth for me on All Pro and Varsity

You can actually see foot planting and stop and go moves by RB's. They actually have enough time to use their Chang of direction ratings.

There's actually still good separation amongst the players speed and big plays are still about the same as it would be on higher threshold

This is a promising discovery!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk