View Single Post
Old 02-01-2025, 07:57 AM   #5
CoachCot
Rookie
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Oct 2023
Re: Historical roster playbooks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom Fighter
I agree with the ratios working pretty well, I dont like how much shotgun formations plays they both use. The Falcons Red Gun used some shotgun for sure but the Oilers were almost exclusively 4 WR under center.

But end of the day I may be getting too picky and the cpu also runs better outmof shotgun so I may just have to deal with letting them do it.
I will say I think the super sim engine was at its best for 90s era results in M 23. The generic offensive playbooks gave you great pass-run splits and offensive production that matched the era. Obviously not perfect as TEs and WR2 on certain teams would catch more balls than their real life counter part, but I feel you could mess with the depth chart to get a great overall balance in catches and completion percentage that reflected the era the best we can modern football games. If you wanted a little more scoring like 94-95, you can use the modern defensive playbooks for teams. If you wanted less you generic defensive playbooks. Will say in my small amount of testing, I haven't been a big fan of the results given by generic defensive playbooks in the super sim engine in 25. Seems like it inflates pass completion percentage
CoachCot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove