[Benz87]

this isnt the right thread for this but i think ea should jsut start over with ratings. It's getting to out of control whit player being too high. OK so if gore is a atleast a 92. Then LT is probably a 100. So thats an 8 point difference. Then how many RB's should be inbetween that gap. I mean you cant really make a statement of "LT is 8 overall points better of a player than Frank Gore." I always though grades were the best way to go. And the grades based on the overall position. Example: someone like Vernon Davis would have an A for speed because he is one of the fastest tight ends.

I dont think anyone should ever be rated 100. Thats basically saying they are the perfect player. No one will ever be the perfect player.