Home

NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

This is a discussion on NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots within the EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-18-2008, 02:18 AM   #73
Pro
 
acarrero's Arena
 
OVR: 10
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Any idea as to how final these rosters are? Last year, was the Beta version a final verison as to rosters?
acarrero is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 10:16 AM   #74
Then..Now...Forever
 
countryboy's Arena
 
OVR: 62
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Greenville, IN
Posts: 51,628
Blog Entries: 1
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Quote:
Originally Posted by acarrero
Any idea as to how final these rosters are? Last year, was the Beta version a final verison as to rosters?
I don't know how final they are, but they are pretty darn close.
__________________
I can't shave with my eyes closed, meaning each day I have to look at myself in the mirror and respect who I see.

I miss the old days of Operation Sports :(


Louisville Cardinals/St.Louis Cardinals
countryboy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 11:08 AM   #75
Banned
 
peteykirch's Arena
 
OVR: 19
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sayreville,NJ
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Quote:
Originally Posted by countryboy
I don't know how final they are, but they are pretty darn close.
I know one thing I'll be mass editing these ratings.

There is no way in hell Cantwell is a 89 and Mike Teel is a 88. 1400 yards, 10tds, 7 ints isn't better than what Teel has accomplished so far.
peteykirch is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 05-18-2008, 11:20 AM   #76
Then..Now...Forever
 
countryboy's Arena
 
OVR: 62
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Greenville, IN
Posts: 51,628
Blog Entries: 1
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Quote:
Originally Posted by peteykirch
I know one thing I'll be mass editing these ratings.

There is no way in hell Cantwell is a 89 and Mike Teel is a 88. 1400 yards, 10tds, 7 ints isn't better than what Teel has accomplished so far.
Well, given that Cantwell is a big NFL prospect this year given his size and arm strength, that may be way he is rated so highly.
__________________
I can't shave with my eyes closed, meaning each day I have to look at myself in the mirror and respect who I see.

I miss the old days of Operation Sports :(


Louisville Cardinals/St.Louis Cardinals
countryboy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 11:24 AM   #77
Banned
 
peteykirch's Arena
 
OVR: 19
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sayreville,NJ
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

I still don't understand how spot duty when Brohm gets hurt makes him rated higher than someone who has started for the last 2 1/2 years.

Size wise Teel and Cantwell are the same, except Cantwell is like 15lbs heavier. Same height though. I kind of wish how deadly Teel could've been last year if he wasn't throwing the ball with a busted thumb for 60% of the year last year.

The same goes with Grutza from Cincy. Even his own coach isn't high on him and he is a 87 overall in the game.

Last edited by peteykirch; 05-18-2008 at 11:27 AM.
peteykirch is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 11:34 AM   #78
Then..Now...Forever
 
countryboy's Arena
 
OVR: 62
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Greenville, IN
Posts: 51,628
Blog Entries: 1
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Quote:
Originally Posted by peteykirch
I still don't understand how spot duty when Brohm gets hurt makes him rated higher than someone who has started for the last 2 1/2 years.

Size wise Teel and Cantwell are the same, except Cantwell is like 15lbs heavier. Same height though. I kind of wish how deadly Teel could've been last year if he wasn't throwing the ball with a busted thumb for 60% of the year last year.

The same goes with Grutza from Cincy. Even his own coach isn't high on him and he is a 87 overall in the game.
I am just giving you a reason as to why he may be rated higher. Don't complain to me, I didn't make the ratings.
__________________
I can't shave with my eyes closed, meaning each day I have to look at myself in the mirror and respect who I see.

I miss the old days of Operation Sports :(


Louisville Cardinals/St.Louis Cardinals
countryboy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 01:41 PM   #79
MVP
 
BaseballCtchr's Arena
 
OVR: 11
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 1,299
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Cant complain much with Clemson:
RB Davis 95
RB Spiller 95 (little high)
SS Hamlin 95
FS Clemons 93
WR Kelley 92
LE Sapp 91
QB Harper 90 (I think he is more in the 85-87 range)

Now for S. Carolina

MLB Brinkley 97
WR McKinley 92
LE Norwood 91 (he has moved to LB so this is going to be too high)
LB Paulk 91 (too high, never really done much on the field. Fun fact told me he would have went to V. Tech had he ever taken a visit there but he never did and alas ends up a Gamecock)
CB Thomas 90 (as long as he cant catch this will work)
RB Davis 90 (way too high and anyone who has watched him will agree)
RT Sorensen 89 (no sure how this happened)

Where is Captain and Emanuel Cook at for SC

Overall not bad.
BaseballCtchr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 01:46 PM   #80
Your Go-to TV Expert
 
Scott's Arena
 
OVR: 52
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 19,779
Blog Entries: 81
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

I disagree with Harper...He is probably one of the Top QBs in the nation.
__________________
PSN-Shugarooo
Steam-ScottM.816
Twitch.tv/Shugarooo
Scott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football »


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 AM.
Top -