MLB 10: The Show Simulates the 2010 Season -
Operation Sports Forums
If you're having problems logging in or staying logged in, please clear/delete your cookies/cache.
We are monitoring and fixing issues in this thread.
Thanks for your patience.
The upgrade is complete, but you've probably noticed the forums are only showing posts up to about April 8. Posts made after that are still in the process of being moved over, and that should take another week or two. Feel free to start a new thread.
The site might feel a little slow while work continues. Engineers are staying on it through the night to get things moving faster again. Thanks for your patience.
The infancy of the 2010 MLB season is wearing off at this point. Interleague play has begun and the All-Star voting is in full swing. To get an idea of what lies ahead, we have already simulated the the 2010 season in MLB 2K10.
Here now is what the 2010 season looks like in MLB 10: The Show.
LMAO, the AL West is upside down form what it is in real life. But I guess the A's can go the entire season only winning 10 more games. Also Adrian Gonzalez to the Royals? Never would have seen that one coming. Phillies also got hosed in that Moyer deal. But all in all a decent sim I guess.
Well, it's all good. But sim again, different results. Sim again, different results. That's what I like about the game is the amount of variables. It's not written in stone.
I believe a three-way tie is handled by labeling the teams as "A", "B", and "C". I'm not sure how they decide which team holds the advantage over the other in selecting who is A,B, or C.
I think that C then plays a game at B. The winner of that game then plays a game at A. The winner of that takes the three-way tie breaker.
I could be horribly wrong but I remember reading this somewhere not too long ago.
I believe a three-way tie is handled by labeling the teams as "A", "B", and "C". I'm not sure how they decide which team holds the advantage over the other in selecting who is A,B, or C.
I think that C then plays a game at B. The winner of that game then plays a game at A. The winner of that takes the three-way tie breaker.
I could be horribly wrong but I remember reading this somewhere not too long ago.
I think that's spot- on. I think teams A, B, and C are chosen by lots, and they get to pick which team that they want to be.
Nice read. One thing I really hope is fixed next year is the trade logic. Why are the Royals giving up a top pitching prospect for Adrian Gonzalez when they have no shot at winning in the sim?
I think that The Show's final results seem pretty accurate.
How are these results accurate at all? When was the last time the league had TWO teams losing over 110 games, if at all? How in the world are the A's gonna lose 112 games with the rotation, bullpen, and defense they have?
If these are the results you're getting, it's time for SCEA to reevaluate how they come up with ratings.
wow. i like it. it seems pretty realistic. the pirates in mlb 2k10's sim went 80-82, which is pretty heartbreaking lol. and in the show, they simmed to be 82-80. lol. that's why i love the show. just kidding. the show is definitely top notch, but not because it simmed the pirates to a winning record. again, i wish i knew wat some of their stats were.
How are these results accurate at all? When was the last time the league had TWO teams losing over 110 games, if at all? How in the world are the A's gonna lose 112 games with the rotation, bullpen, and defense they have?
If these are the results you're getting, it's time for SCEA to reevaluate how they come up with ratings.
I know the cliche 'that's why they play 162 games', but at their current winning percentages, the Indians would lose 101 games, the Astros would lose 107, and the Orioles would lose 111. Not out of the realm of possibilities.
Comment