NBA Live 14 Ultimate Team Details

[juicey79]

Quote: Originally Posted by Boilerbuzz

Bow down to the masters on this side.

Menu is decent, can the gameplay be just as decent? I wish we could get a quarter of gameplay.

[juicey79]

Take a look at NBA Live 13 trailer the same hardwood effects on this menu are in that trailer. PLEASE CAN WE GET A QTR OF GAMEPLAY....PLEASE.

[jerk]

Really wish 2k would steal this from them. I love ultimate team in all ea games. Nobody does it better.

[Boilerbuzz]

Quote: Originally Posted by juicey79

Menu is decent, can the gameplay be just as decent? I wish we could get a quarter of gameplay.

I don't care what it is - as long as it's NEW information not related to dribbling, soundtracks, or ported over features seen in other EA titles. I'm dying for some Live news!

[Boilerbuzz]

Quote: Originally Posted by jerk

Really wish 2k would steal this from them. I love ultimate team in all ea games. Nobody does it better.

For the record, that's MyTeam, but let's not bring 2K into this thread.

[westview33]

Quote: Originally Posted by PiNOYPANDEMiK

Blake Griffin is a top10 PF easily, so I don't know what you are talking about. John Wall on the other hand should not be considered better than Blake Griffin. Seriously Blake Griffin an 84 and Wall 85? I know it's only a video game, but those numbers pretty much says John Wall is more valuable than Blake. If CP3 is an 88 and Wall (who is not even a top10 pg in the game) is an 85, then what about the other pg's that are better than Wall? You're telling me we have a lot of PG's in the 85-88 ratings? Terrible.

Blake is a top 10 PF in terms of dunking the ball.But he's sub par in rebounding, defense and creating any offense outside of a dunk.So why would it be a crime for him to be a 84 when he plays no defense, doesn't rebound and can;t hit a shot without dunking?Unless of course your one of those guys who only watch highlights and dunking is all that counts when rating a player.

[Boilerbuzz]

Quote: Originally Posted by westview33

Blake is a top 10 PF in terms of dunking the ball.But he's sub par in rebounding, defense and creating any offense outside of a dunk.So why would it be a crime for him to be a 84 when he plays no defense, doesn't rebound and can;t hit a shot without dunking?Unless of course your one of those guys who only watch highlights and dunking is all that counts when rating a player.

On the whole, I agree completely. But he's not a bad rebounder. He SHOULD be better than he is, but he's still not bad.

[Championships]

Quote: Originally Posted by westview33

Blake is a top 10 PF in terms of dunking the ball.But he's sub par in rebounding, defense and creating any offense outside of a dunk.So why would it be a crime for him to be a 84 when he plays no defense, doesn't rebound and can;t hit a shot without dunking?Unless of course your one of those guys who only watch highlights and dunking is all that counts when rating a player.

Guys that don't rebound don't average 14+ rebounds in college and then go to the league and average 10+.

Not disagreeing with your statement but it kinda seems like you only focus on his highlight plays in terms of offense.