Madden NFL 16 Player Ratings - Top 5 Tight Ends

[BreakingBad2013]

EA Sports has released more Madden NFL 16 ratings. Below are the top 5 tight ends in Madden NFL 16, more ratings on these players can be seen here.

• Rob Gronkowski (99 OVR)
• Jimmy Graham (95 OVR)
• Jason Witten (93 OVR)
• Greg Olsen (92 OVR)
• Travis Kelce (91 OVR)

Previously released Madden NFL 16 player ratings:

• Madden NFL 16 Player Ratings - Top 5 Wide Receivers
• Madden NFL 16 Player Ratings - Top 6 Quarterbacks
• Madden NFL 16 Player Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs
• Madden NFL 16 Rookie Ratings Revealed - Top 10

[guppya]

Jesus how many players are rated above 95 on this game? Lmao.

[The JareBear]

Yeah I think this was predictable. I don't have an issue with the order. Seems like everyone has great spec catch this year tho

[The JareBear]

I know Julius Thomas is a big name but keep in mind he can't block. He's probably a 95 in terms of pass catching but the terrible block ratings probably brought his ovr to 89 or 90

[DCEBB2001]

Well, the OVRs are unreal again. A trend to continue, I imagine.

Here's mine:

Gronk: 82
Graham: 78
Olsen: 73
Witten: 71
Cameron: 68

[guppya]

Quote: Originally Posted by DCEBB2001

Well, the OVRs are unreal again. A trend to continue, I imagine. Here's mine: Gronk: 82 Graham: 78 Olsen: 73 Witten: 71 Cameron: 68

I know your ratings make the game better. But perhaps you can adjust the ratings ratios better if you know what I mean, to make the game a bit more marketable. Like if you add 10 to all of those ratings I think it wouldn't be a complete turnoff aesthetically to the casual gamer.

EDIT: Add 10 numerically but the effects of those ratings stay the same. If you understand what I'm saying.

[Gossennator]

I really hope these ratings are in sync with the new gameplay mechanics and sliders.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by guppya

I know your ratings make the game better. But perhaps you can adjust the ratings ratios better if you know what I mean, to make the game a bit more marketable. Like if you add 10 to all of those ratings I think it wouldn't be a complete turnoff aesthetically to the casual gamer. EDOT: Add 10 numerically but the effects of those ratings stay the same. If you understand what I'm saying.

I really could care less about the aesthetic appearance. I put all my eggs into the realism basket. The goal is to see exactly how elite some of these elite players are, being very far above the average players.

Here's the top guys, overall, regardless of position:

http://www.fbgratings.com/members/top100.php