Unsure of judges scoring

[OKC_35]

Quite confused on judging any ideas how judges score?

[aholbert32]

I think we need a video. The problem is looking at the final stats doesnt help much in determining who won. From that photo, we have no idea how many times, you or him were rocked, what the final judging totals were or how much damage you or him took.

[LarsP]

Maybe we should have a general 'The judges f**ked me thread' for whenever someone feels they've lost a decision that they should win.

[MacGowan]

Quote: Originally Posted by LarsP

Maybe we should have a general 'The judges f**ked me thread' for whenever someone feels they've lost a decision that they should win.

Amen. It's not even broken down in rounds. That being said I do wish the game would;
- give points to takedowns (or give more damage to takedowns=points to takedown)
- give more points/damage to ground strikes.

[GrindFactor]

Yeah, there's no doubt the judging is seriously flawed.

I just had a fight in UT where I was GSP against a demian maia. I had 8 takedowns, ground control for the majority of the fight, mounted him 4 times and landed ground and pound, 3 sub attempts plus some sig strikes and 1 rock on the feet.

He got no takedowns, attempted only 2 submissions, was dominated on the ground for large chunks of time, got taken down at will, and just landed a few strikes here and there on the feet, maybe rocking me once.

I thought when the fight was over it was an obvious win I wasn't even thinking about it... I mean I dominated him with my wrestling and ground and pound the whole fight, had control of the fight pace the whole time, etc.

But nope... he gets the decision win. Huh? He was even shocked he got the win!

They've talked about fixing the judging system in a patch but really need to get on it because sometimes it's just straight out ridiculous.

[aholbert32]

Quote: Originally Posted by GrindFactor

Yeah, there's no doubt the judging is seriously flawed. I just had a fight in UT where I was GSP against a demian maia. I had 8 takedowns, ground control for the majority of the fight, mounted him 4 times and landed ground and pound, 3 sub attempts plus some sig strikes and 1 rock on the feet. He got no takedowns, attempted only 2 submissions, was dominated on the ground for large chunks of time, got taken down at will, and just landed a few strikes here and there on the feet, maybe rocking me once. I thought when the fight was over it was an obvious win I wasn't even thinking about it... I mean I dominated him with my wrestling and ground and pound the whole fight, had control of the fight pace the whole time, etc. But nope... he gets the decision win. Huh? He was even shocked he got the win! They've talked about fixing the judging system in a patch but really need to get on it because sometimes it's just straight out ridiculous.

Takedowns dont matter in the new real life judging criteria or the in-game criteria.

Ground Control doesnt matter in the new real life judging criteria or the in-game criteria.

Positions dont matter in the new real life criteria or the in-game criteria.

Sub attempts only matter if they are close to finishing the fight.

The only thing that matters are actions that cause damage/impact to bring the fight closer to the end.

[Dave_S]

Quote: Originally Posted by aholbert32

Takedowns dont matter in the new real life judging criteria or the in-game criteria. Ground Control doesnt matter in the new real life judging criteria or the in-game criteria. Positions dont matter in the new real life criteria or the in-game criteria. Sub attempts only matter if they are close to finishing the fight. The only thing that matters are actions that cause damage/impact to bring the fight closer to the end.

Who told you this? I think they lied to you.


If ufc 3 scoring is based on this logic that's hilarious. Their is no way the devs can believe this?

[MacGowan]

Quote: Originally Posted by GrindFactor

He was even shocked he got the win!

Haha! I'd love for that to be a new animation.