02:15 PM - February 19, 2016 by Steve_OS
We just received 20 new MLB The Show 16 screenshots. Check them all out here and let us know what you think!
MLB The Show 16 News Post
02:15 PM - February 19, 2016 by Steve_OSWe just received 20 new MLB The Show 16 screenshots. Check them all out here and let us know what you think!
MLB The Show 16 Videos
Member Comments
|
|||||||||||||
|
If they spent a year and worked on nothing but player models and everything else you mentioned above and nothing else would you be here posting about how happy you were or would you find something else that went untouched to complain about?
These images are incredible. Textures look million times better. deGrom's hair looks real.
But I'm a little disappointed with Citi Field. The scoreboard in center has some display as it did last year also the right center field fence isn't all chain link anymore its half padded and half chain link.
Don't know if stadiums are locked and completed or if there's still time to get this fix in.
But I'm a little disappointed with Citi Field. The scoreboard in center has some display as it did last year also the right center field fence isn't all chain link anymore its half padded and half chain link.
Don't know if stadiums are locked and completed or if there's still time to get this fix in.
# 63
Russell_SCEA @ 02/20/16 03:38 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
I've noticed that at Camden Yards, the backdrop behind the tunnels to the concourse in the upper deck is dark. They aren't transparent. For example, for the upper deck in LF, you should be able to see through the tunnels and the sky/sunlight/buildings behind the stadium should be visible.
This looks good on the lower deck, but not the upper deck. A minor thing but I've noticed it for years. If this could be fixed it would be great!
Also at Camden, the overhead portion of the tunnels are now painted orange.
Below are three reference photos.
First for the transparency that would be nice to see in the game:
And a reference showing the orange paint on the tunnels:
Finally, a reference of the lack of transparency that you see in the game (notice the darkness behind the tunnels in the upper deck):
This looks good on the lower deck, but not the upper deck. A minor thing but I've noticed it for years. If this could be fixed it would be great!
Also at Camden, the overhead portion of the tunnels are now painted orange.
Below are three reference photos.
First for the transparency that would be nice to see in the game:
And a reference showing the orange paint on the tunnels:
Finally, a reference of the lack of transparency that you see in the game (notice the darkness behind the tunnels in the upper deck):
|
|||||||||||||
|
Thanks Ramone!
|
|||||||||||||
|
In reference to the sweat and dirt "clumps" or whatever they are
...I feel this has been an issue with sports games forever. It's enticing for devs to add in little "realism" things visually like this, but fans maybe not really being into those visual flair things added in. I remember people flipping out at when NBA games got "real" sweat. Then when the game came out everyone wanted it turned off or toned down since it was a bit much. The sweat and changing dirt during games are great ideas I think to add a little something extra visually, but I get why people dislike them. Sweat should only show up when the temperature reaches a certain level and later in games. I'd also agree that the dirt clumps should probably go and be replaced with just the dirt getting messed on the surface level. I don't notice them that much in game, but in screenshots I get why people dislike them.
# 68
ajblithe20 @ 02/20/16 05:06 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
Not to answer for him but... I'm always very happy with The Show and play it constantly. It's always fun and immersive. The problem he's mentioning is that every other graphical part of the game has been worked on. The player models haven't been changed. They made a nice improvement with different running styles around the bases, but the player models are not good and I think it's fair to say that.
I, for one, will never not the buy the game over one thing not being updated, and I'll always enjoy it. But player models are definitely overdue for a change
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 70
Jolly Roger @ 02/20/16 07:49 PM
I wonder how time consuming and difficult it would be for them to completely rip out the current player models from the code and install new ones. Hopefully the fact that the current player models have been in the game for so long doesn't mean that replacing them would cause all sorts of deep-rooted issues with other aspects of the game code.
I've been wanting a completely different player creation system for years; hopefully this is something that can be looked at next year. As it currently stands, they've taken care of so much else, (much to their credit!), so I can't think of any other massive changes that need to be made at this point. Getting ever closer to perfection!
I've been wanting a completely different player creation system for years; hopefully this is something that can be looked at next year. As it currently stands, they've taken care of so much else, (much to their credit!), so I can't think of any other massive changes that need to be made at this point. Getting ever closer to perfection!
|
|||||||||||||
|
I don't think they could do it very easily, and I don't even think they will try at first.
I expect they will try to modify them and see what they can get out of them visually so they can keep all the animations intact.
I don't think we will see totally new models from the ground up for a few years.
# 72
Russell_SCEA @ 02/20/16 08:21 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
Nope it's the exact opposite changing them means the entire animation core no longer works. But we aren't talking about next year or the future. I'll just say that body type diversity and granularity is high on our list for 17, but that's not an indication of diddly. That's about all we'll say on the topic for now. We will continue to move forward with our process just like we did from the first year of PS3 until now. So far we've done ok by following that plan.
Thanks for the pictures. I only play franchise - what mode is Matchup rating? It looks like turmoil.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 76
LastActionHero @ 02/21/16 11:40 AM
I'm already happy when the bulky players don't look like they have a pillow under their jersey [emoji4]
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cloth physics would be a neat addition, but is it a priority?
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
And cloth physics is a big component when it comes to player models. Players differentiate in the way they wear their uniforms heavily. Some examples
Spoiler
Unbuttoned jerseys are gonna look totally different when in motion compared to fully buttoned jereys
Baggy pants will look totally different as well
Baggier jerseys compared to tighter jerseys
All the material will hang differently and give player models actual uniqueness. I'm assuming this level of detail would be hard to implement though, but something i hope can be incorporated.
Post A Comment
Working...