What Project Should I Undertake?

[NYwRiter94]

ALL ON MVP BASEBALL 2005, '09 MEANS UPDATED ROSTERS

Pros and cons of each:

Stick with '05 Twins: Video Updates, but takes a long time to update, which leads to lost interest. Also played on PS2, which feels most natural(will have to program Xbox 360 controller with PC). Already existing thread.

'09 PC Fantasy Draft: New thread, new team. No video updates, but easily extracted boxscores which allows me to churn out games much faster, and thus get further on in the season.

'09 PC Yankees: Same as above, but with the Yankees '09 roster instead of an '09 Fantasy Draft.

[sraczk2011]

Quote: Originally Posted by NYwRiter94

ALL ON MVP BASEBALL 2005, '09 MEANS UPDATED ROSTERS Pros and cons of each: Stick with '05 Twins: Video Updates, but takes a long time to update, which leads to lost interest. Also played on PS2, which feels most natural(will have to program Xbox 360 controller with PC). Already existing thread. '09 PC Fantasy Draft: New thread, new team. No video updates, but easily extracted boxscores which allows me to churn out games much faster, and thus get further on in the season. '09 PC Yankees: Same as above, but with the Yankees '09 roster instead of an '09 Fantasy Draft.

The PC Fantasy draft sounds like it would be the best bet for us and for you.

[cubsfan203]

I voted twins. I don't think I've ever seen a fantasy draft last very long on here, so I wouldn't go with that because it seems people get tired of them really quickly.

[NYwRiter94]

Quote: Originally Posted by cubsfan203

I voted twins. I don't think I've ever seen a fantasy draft last very long on here, so I wouldn't go with that because it seems people get tired of them really quickly.

That would, I think, be in favor of '09. On the PC, I can update often, which would enable me to get further in a dynasty. I'll still count that as a vote for Twins, though.

[rdnk]

Quote: Originally Posted by sraczk2011

The PC Fantasy draft sounds like it would be the best bet for us and for you.

I agree. It's kinda hard for people to follow a dynasty from 4 years ago. It would also be more interesting than being the #1 team in the AL right now.

[sraczk2011]

Quote: Originally Posted by rdnk

I agree. It's kinda hard for people to follow a dynasty from 4 years ago. It would also be more interesting than being the #1 team in the AL right now.

And I think everyone is sick of Yankees/Penguins/Cowboys/Lakers dynasties.