09-17-2012, 01:55 PM
|
#147
|
Banned
|
Re: Many More NBA 2K13 Player Ratings Revealed - Knicks, Lakers, Bulls, Heat and More
From the looks of it, I can only speculate that the ratings favor the Offensive Players. If you can shoot and score, you warrant a higher overall.
On that note: Brook Lopez's offensive game is superior to that of Roy Hibbert and Tyson Chandler. Especially Inside and Close shot ... We know Lopez is soft and lacks aggression, but if I need someone to score in the low post, I am giving it to Brook Lopez. Another factor about him, he can shoot free throws (80% at the line) so fouling him is also a risk. Lopez also has a better Midrange shot. Chandler and Hibbert's midrange shot has to be in the 55-65 range.
Hibbert and Chandler do not have any post moves, either. Hibbert has a hook shot in his arsenal and that is it, and 2K13 will reflect that in the game with his B Inside Game. Midrange jumper? No way. Hibbert I will admit will have a superior layup rating, but other than that he doesn't have the shooting Lopez has.
Chandler, there is nothing to say with his offense. It's his defense and I already proved that by showing his letter grades, he beats Lopez and Hibbert with his defense. Only thing I can say is, 2K13 overall rating takes the offensive game into its value. Chandler's offense brings him down to a 77. This is why the OVERALL rating should be removed and become arbitrary - a pseudo number to represent a player's prestige and rank.
-----
Back to Lopez and Hibbert argument ...
What it might look like with the numerical attributes:
(Bold indicates dominance)
Lopez (80 OVR)
Inside Game: A-
Inside Shot: 92
Close Shot: 87
Midrange: 75
Layup 45
Hibbert (79 OVR)
Inside Game: B
Inside Shot: 96
Close Shot: 80
Midrange: 63
Layup: 55
These aren't real, just an example, but this is how I think the ratings are based ... Offensive Game has higher value.
my 2 cents
|
|
|