NBA 2K13 Ratings - Harris, Allen, Brooks, Pierce, Butler and Randolph

[Lucretius8]

And hasn't Hibbert been adjusted to a 79?

[Saturnis]

Quote: Originally Posted by Lucretius8

I'm not talking about specific skill ratings... if Ray Allen is a 90 at dunking, obviously that's too high. But what people are saying is that oh, Bosh is better than Duncan, so he shouldn't be an 83 while Duncan's an 87.

but even last year something was wrong with the way players were rated. don't believe me, go look at how ray dunks when he hasn't done that since who knows when. The skills and attributes are being applied unjustly.

[Lucretius8]

Quote: Originally Posted by Saturnis

but even last year something was wrong with the way players were rated. don't believe me, go look at how ray dunks when he hasn't done that since who knows when. The skills and attributes are being applied unjustly.

No, I see that, I think Ray was like a 69 at dunking, which was cool with me since he can still get up. It's just that his animations/dunk package didn't reflect his rating and actual dunks very well... but then again they can't customize every player.

[UnbelievablyRAW]

Quote: Originally Posted by Lucretius8

Here's the problem with everybody criticizing the ratings - the ratings are NOT meant to reflect "how good" a player is in real life. 2K uses a formula to try to best capture player attributes and skills so that we can play a video game. Ratings are not rankings. So, let's stop complaining

See to me, the overall ratings are what tell you a players worth. The individual ratings tell you what the player is good at.

Shumpert can be a great defender, but overall, he is not a player that I would say values even near a Chris Bosh.

[Lucretius8]

Quote: Originally Posted by UnbelievablyRAW

See to me, the overall ratings are what tell you a players worth. The individual ratings tell you what the player is good at. Shumpert can be a great defender, but overall, he is not a player that I would say values even near a Chris Bosh.

Yea, but since adding to each individual rating affects the players worth, which is dependent on some formula 2k made, I think it would be hard to match ratings with worth. Not impossible, but with all those individual ratings, it'd probably be hard. Catch my drift?

[RED BULL]

lol, copy and paste of 2k12

[Neoda2khead]

Personally I think ratings should be based on a players skill . Then his individual tendencies on his talents should give him his rate . An 80 for Allen is high tho he can't jump anymore he's slower and he turns the ball over alot more . His ratings should have drop drastically . But that wouldn't make him any worse of a three point shooter . He's more spot up at this point of his career . So an overall 75 to 76 would make more sense because he does less nowadays . That's just me . Check my edits after the game launches gt: POP THAT SPLIFF

[RedRiddler]

The LA bias continue with 2K...How can Butler have a higher rating than Paul George and probably Batum?