Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-31-2004, 02:21 PM   #1
John Galt
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Internets
Good Article about Some Facts in Kobe Trial

CNNSI had an article today that does a pretty good job of discussing the DNA and blood evidence (without sensationalizing or attacking):

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...906/index.html
__________________
I do mind, the Dude minds. This will not stand, ya know, this aggression will not stand, man. - The Dude

John Galt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 02:29 PM   #2
Franklinnoble
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Placerville, CA
Interesting. I still think Kobe is gonna get away with it.
Franklinnoble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 02:35 PM   #3
RainRaven
High School JV
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
It won't be a pretty trial for Kobe, but it still comes down mostly to a he said she said case. I don't even think this thing will go to the jury, but if it does I think the civil case already being filed hurts her more then she might think. It's like a big neon sign saying I am in it for the money stupid.
__________________
"It can't rain all the time"-The Crow
RainRaven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 02:40 PM   #4
Franklinnoble
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Placerville, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by RainRaven
It won't be a pretty trial for Kobe, but it still comes down mostly to a he said she said case. I don't even think this thing will go to the jury, but if it does I think the civil case already being filed hurts her more then she might think. It's like a big neon sign saying I am in it for the money stupid.

I disagree. I think the civil case says "I think the prosecuting attorney in the criminal trial is incompetent, and the only way I'm getting any justice here is if a high-paid private lawyer can argue my case for me."
Franklinnoble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 02:41 PM   #5
Huckleberry
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Thanks for the article. I hadn't seen anywhere that they had concluded it was her blood on his shirt. That's not good news for him.

As for the civil suit, that's standard practice, especially when it seems the criminal case is going badly. That can be easily ignored by a jury.
__________________
The one thing all your failed relationships have in common is you.

The Barking Carnival (Longhorn-centered sports blog)
College Football Adjusted Stats and Ratings
Huckleberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 02:52 PM   #6
rexallllsc
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Quote:
"If she is sexually active," explained Garrison, "she is not going to hurt and bleed if she had consensual sex with Kobe. You only bleed if you don't want it to happen."

That's BS.
rexallllsc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 03:01 PM   #7
clintl
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Davis, CA
Coupled with the medical findings by the exam nurses, who are trained experts, it's not BS.

Quote:
Next her parents drove her to Valley View Hospital, where two nurses trained in sexual-assault cases conducted a rape-kit exam. SI has learned the exam revealed "multiple lacerations" and "bruises" between the vagina and anal opening. The nurses, noting the subject had not showered or douched since the encounter, described the injuries as genital "trauma" inconsistent with consensual sex.
clintl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 03:02 PM   #8
Danny
General Manager
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
I think they should measure Kobe's Dong and see if that could of caused the bleeding.
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 03:24 PM   #9
Glengoyne
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleEye11
I think they should measure Kobe's Dong and see if that could of caused the bleeding.

If it doesn't fit, you must acquit?
Glengoyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 03:30 PM   #10
Franklinnoble
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Placerville, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glengoyne
If it doesn't fit, you must acquit?

Franklinnoble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 04:06 PM   #11
sabotai
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Satellite of Love
From the article: "When asked how he knew the woman wanted to have sex, Bryant said he could tell from the look she gave him."

Anyone else catch this? This just doesn't sit right with me. I've always given Bryant the benifit of the doubt in this case. Hearing this about DNA evidence and that about blood and all the other shit that's come out.

But this just doesn't look good to me. He knew she wanted to have sex because of a look she gave him? He didn't say because she was all over him, taking her clothes off while dry humping his leg. He didn't say because she came out and stated she wanted to have sex. It was because of a look? That doesn't sit right with me.
sabotai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 04:12 PM   #12
The_herd
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Lackland, Texas (San Antonio)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabotai
From the article: "When asked how he knew the woman wanted to have sex, Bryant said he could tell from the look she gave him."

Anyone else catch this? This just doesn't sit right with me. I've always given Bryant the benifit of the doubt in this case. Hearing this about DNA evidence and that about blood and all the other shit that's come out.

But this just doesn't look good to me. He knew she wanted to have sex because of a look she gave him? He didn't say because she was all over him, taking her clothes off while dry humping his leg. He didn't say because she came out and stated she wanted to have sex. It was because of a look? That doesn't sit right with me.


You're telling me you weren't thinking the same after "Taffy Girl" looked at you?
__________________
Oakland Raiders: HFL's 1970 AC West Champs
The_herd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 04:13 PM   #13
rexallllsc
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabotai
From the article: "When asked how he knew the woman wanted to have sex, Bryant said he could tell from the look she gave him."

Anyone else catch this? This just doesn't sit right with me. I've always given Bryant the benifit of the doubt in this case. Hearing this about DNA evidence and that about blood and all the other shit that's come out.

But this just doesn't look good to me. He knew she wanted to have sex because of a look she gave him? He didn't say because she was all over him, taking her clothes off while dry humping his leg. He didn't say because she came out and stated she wanted to have sex. It was because of a look? That doesn't sit right with me.

That's def. shady.
rexallllsc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 04:17 PM   #14
sabotai
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Satellite of Love
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_herd
You're telling me you weren't thinking the same after "Taffy Girl" looked at you?

At least Taffy Girl was overtly offering me something.

Last edited by sabotai : 08-31-2004 at 04:18 PM.
sabotai is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.