Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > Off Topic
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-08-2011, 03:31 PM   #1
GrantDawg
World Champion Mis-speller
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
NFL PostSeason: Wild-card Round

How is there not a thread? Go Seahawks!!!!

GrantDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 03:33 PM   #2
spleen1015
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Rootin for the Seahawks, too!
spleen1015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 03:35 PM   #3
RendeR
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
I refuse to root for a playoff team with a losing record.
RendeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 03:36 PM   #4
kingfc22
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
And the 7-9 team starts off with a bang. LOL
__________________
Fan of SF Giants, 49ers, Sharks, Arsenal
kingfc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 03:37 PM   #5
GrantDawg
World Champion Mis-speller
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RendeR View Post
I refuse to root for a playoff team with a losing record.


You would if it means your team would then play them at home in the next round.
GrantDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 03:38 PM   #6
frnk55
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
I kinda hope Seattle wins. It would be funny.
frnk55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 03:41 PM   #7
GrantDawg
World Champion Mis-speller
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
Way to drop that ball, Bush. You over-rated piece of crap.
GrantDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 03:45 PM   #8
Alan T
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
I agree, go Seattle!
__________________
Couch to ??k - From the couch to a Marathon in roughly 18 months.


Alan T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 03:53 PM   #9
JPhillips
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
Is it too early to say the game's decided?
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers
JPhillips is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 03:53 PM   #10
frnk55
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Yawn..Maybe it's time for a movie.
frnk55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 04:02 PM   #11
LloydLungs
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPhillips View Post
Is it too early to say the game's decided?

Yep. Saints have blown lots of big early leads to bad teams this year.
LloydLungs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 04:28 PM   #12
kingfc22
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Is anybody going to play defense?
__________________
Fan of SF Giants, 49ers, Sharks, Arsenal
kingfc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 04:29 PM   #13
whomario
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
really impressive couple of plays by Hasselbeck, especially considering how horrible it started for him and all the discussion about him ahead of the game.
whomario is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 04:30 PM   #14
cuervo72
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
Dear Mr. Hammond,

STOP JIZZING EVERY TIME A FORMER NOTRE DAME PLAYER TOUCHES THE BALL.

k, Thx
__________________
null
cuervo72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 04:30 PM   #15
bhlloy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
I think I am a better NFL safety than Roman Harper. He's been at fault for at least 75% of the Seahawks succesful offensive plays so far.

Definitely the two worst defenses in an NFL playoff game I can remember so far. Gonna be who can score last or who can avoid a couple of turnovers.
bhlloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 04:33 PM   #16
cuervo72
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
You too, Mayock. I don't give a crap about this "Golden Domer" bs.
__________________
null
cuervo72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 04:41 PM   #17
kingfc22
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuervo72 View Post
You too, Mayock. I don't give a crap about this "Golden Domer" bs.

Yea, this crew sucks. Nobody is watching because of Notre Dame. Last time I checked their season was over.
__________________
Fan of SF Giants, 49ers, Sharks, Arsenal
kingfc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 04:56 PM   #18
Travis
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Canada eh
Funny how much quieter it gets around here when the score became competitive and how much busier it'll probably get if the Saints pull ahead in the second half.

But while the game is tight and good plays being made, crickets. Do that many enjoy ripping games/players that much more than enjoying what, to this point, has been a pretty well played game? Or is there just that few watching the game?
__________________
"I don't want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it." - Rogers Hornsby

Last edited by Travis : 01-08-2011 at 04:56 PM.
Travis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 04:58 PM   #19
SackAttack
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
I'm surprised no flag on that shot to Hasselbeck after the TD.
SackAttack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 04:59 PM   #20
whomario
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
this is a fun game to watch by now i really want Seattle to advance, too.
whomario is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 04:59 PM   #21
Alan T
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis View Post
Funny how much quieter it gets around here when the score became competitive and how much busier it'll probably get if the Saints pull ahead in the second half.

But while the game is tight and good plays being made, crickets. Do that many enjoy ripping games/players that much more than enjoying what, to this point, has been a pretty well played game? Or is there just that few watching the game?


I'm watching the game, but don't have much to say. I'm hoping Seattle wins and eliminates the Saints, so happy that right now they are winning. I'm not a Seattle fan or anything though, so it honestly doesn't matter too much to me if one wins or the other though.
__________________
Couch to ??k - From the couch to a Marathon in roughly 18 months.


Alan T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:02 PM   #22
bhlloy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis View Post
Funny how much quieter it gets around here when the score became competitive and how much busier it'll probably get if the Saints pull ahead in the second half.

But while the game is tight and good plays being made, crickets. Do that many enjoy ripping games/players that much more than enjoying what, to this point, has been a pretty well played game? Or is there just that few watching the game?

You know it's possible to have a computer and a TV in the same room right?

It hasn't been a well played game, at least defensively. There were just four Saints players covering a 30 yard patch of grass while Stokely ran right past them, including the aforementioned Harper who is just having a nightmare. I'm sorry a discussion on a messageboard has offended your delicate sensibilities so much though
bhlloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:07 PM   #23
RainMaker
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis View Post
But while the game is tight and good plays being made, crickets. Do that many enjoy ripping games/players that much more than enjoying what, to this point, has been a pretty well played game? Or is there just that few watching the game?
Saturday afternoon is a weird time for the NFL and it's the poorest game of the 4 (at least perception wise). I wouldn't mind seeing Seattle win since there is a chance they'd get to play the Bears next week.
RainMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:09 PM   #24
Travis
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Canada eh
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhlloy View Post
You know it's possible to have a computer and a TV in the same room right?

It hasn't been a well played game, at least defensively. There were just four Saints players covering a 30 yard patch of grass while Stokely ran right past them, including the aforementioned Harper who is just having a nightmare. I'm sorry a discussion on a messageboard has offended your delicate sensibilities so much though

Not offended, just a commentary. Read the start of this thread and you can look at the time stamps. Prior to the game there was a lot of commentary (radio, online, other threads here) how bad Seattle would get thumped. Game starts, the Saints take the lead, Hasselbeck throws the interception, Seattle goes down by 10 a second time and there's chatter.

Seattle comes back, ties up and takes the lead and the thread is pretty much dead.

I just find it interesting that there's more commentary when the early indications show that this might be a thumping, but once it turns into a pretty competitive back and forth game (which one would think would be a better game to watch even if a bit sloppy as you suggest), that's when it got a lot quieter here, hence my observation/comment.
__________________
"I don't want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it." - Rogers Hornsby
Travis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:12 PM   #25
Travis
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Canada eh
Quote:
Originally Posted by RainMaker View Post
Saturday afternoon is a weird time for the NFL and it's the poorest game of the 4 (at least perception wise). I wouldn't mind seeing Seattle win since there is a chance they'd get to play the Bears next week.

That'd be an interesting lead in given that the Seahawks were able to win already in Chicago this year already. My gf asked me today what the Seahawks chances were today (she's not into football really) and I told her that on their best day they can play with nearly any team in the league but that it'd surprise me if they had the consistency to be able to do so long enough to get deep into the playoffs. That said, if they can get through today, gain some confidence and go into a place they've already won without getting over confident, it'd make for a heck of a game.

I hope
__________________
"I don't want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it." - Rogers Hornsby

Last edited by Travis : 01-08-2011 at 05:14 PM.
Travis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:12 PM   #26
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Seattle still sucks
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:14 PM   #27
SnowMan
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Georgia via Alaska via Washington
Loving the big middle finger the Hawks are giving the league right now.
SnowMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:15 PM   #28
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
it is XL-lent to see the Seachickens in the playoffs again.
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:15 PM   #29
bhlloy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
OK, point taken. FWIW I don't think there was ever a chance the Seahawks were going to get thumped. New Orleans just isn't close to the same team they were last year and at Qwest anything can happen. But even I'm surprised at just how bad the Saints look defensively. Losing Malcolm Jenkins hurts a lot, their safety play has been horrific but still. Where did all the blitzing and the aggressive front seven go?
bhlloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:17 PM   #30
Dutch
"Dutch"
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Tampa, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowMan View Post
Loving the big middle finger the Hawks are giving the league right now.

This really just proves that on any given Sunday, shitty teams can win and it also proves that the point of the regular season is no longer meant to ensure that shitty teams don't get a chance to prove that fact.
Dutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:19 PM   #31
SnowMan
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Georgia via Alaska via Washington
Also reinforces that you shouldn't overlook anyone, and the "good" teams should get work done to make sure those "shitty" teams don't sucker punch them.
SnowMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:19 PM   #32
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
Cosign about shitty teams.
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:21 PM   #33
Travis
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Canada eh
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhlloy View Post
OK, point taken. FWIW I don't think there was ever a chance the Seahawks were going to get thumped. New Orleans just isn't close to the same team they were last year and at Qwest anything can happen. But even I'm surprised at just how bad the Saints look defensively. Losing Malcolm Jenkins hurts a lot, their safety play has been horrific but still. Where did all the blitzing and the aggressive front seven go?

Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me if part of it was the Saints not wanting to tip too much of their game plan going forward (maybe some over confidence in what it would take to beat the Seahawks) combined with the Jekyl/Hyde nature of Hasselbeck this year so far. May have figured they wouldn't need to get that creative defensively to get a couple of turnovers and let the offense win the game. Guessing we'll see more of the pressure packages out of them starting in the second half. Also doesn't hurt that Seattle has used some quick hitters to try and dissuade the Saints from bringing too much pressure.

It's going to be an interesting second half as what I really fear is that the Seahawks continue to not get a lot of pressure on Brees and he goes off. The Seattle D needs to figure out a way to make him get out of his comfort zone and get some hits on him or else this lead could be really short lived.
__________________
"I don't want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it." - Rogers Hornsby
Travis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:21 PM   #34
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
This really just proves that on any given Sunday, shitty teams can win and it also proves that the point of the regular season is no longer meant to ensure that shitty teams don't get a chance to prove that fact.

and sometimes on Saturday
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:24 PM   #35
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
I actually hope the Saints lose because it will give Drew Brees a few extra weeks to clean up the oil spill
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:30 PM   #36
whomario
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
wow, this was an awesome play/call/throw !

i´m having fun watching this as a "not-so-regularly-watching" guy

Last edited by whomario : 01-08-2011 at 05:31 PM.
whomario is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:30 PM   #37
kingfc22
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Boom goes the dynamite!
__________________
Fan of SF Giants, 49ers, Sharks, Arsenal
kingfc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:30 PM   #38
Ragone
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas City, Mo
saints gonna lose this game, i really think they thought just showing up would win them the game this week
Ragone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:31 PM   #39
Matthean
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowMan View Post
Loving the big middle finger the Hawks are giving the league right now.

When the commish got interviewed some time ago about the playoffs he mentioned how people have talked about changing the seedings. He never mentioned changing the fact that regardless if you win your division you are in. In other words, Seattle would still be in if a possible rule change would happen. The only difference is that they would be the #6 seed. Only the Pats are the one team I feel remotely comfortable in saying they would win a game. The NFC is a complete roll of the dice. N.O. is good enough to blow them out, but it's a Saints team that has struggled a lot as well.
__________________
Board games: Bringing people back to the original social network, the table.

Last edited by Matthean : 01-08-2011 at 05:34 PM.
Matthean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:37 PM   #40
RainMaker
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch View Post
This really just proves that on any given Sunday, shitty teams can win and it also proves that the point of the regular season is no longer meant to ensure that shitty teams don't get a chance to prove that fact.
Parity. A 7-9 team isn't that far off from a 10-6 team, especially when they are playing in the loudest stadium in the NFL.
RainMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:41 PM   #41
JonInMiddleGA
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevew View Post
I actually hope the Saints lose because it will give Drew Brees a few extra weeks to clean up the oil spill

Well it isn't really fair, I mean if the rest of us could walk on water then we'd be able to handle the spill as easily as Drew "Chuck Norris" Brees.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
JonInMiddleGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 05:54 PM   #42
kingfc22
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Wow. Little early for that much desperation.
__________________
Fan of SF Giants, 49ers, Sharks, Arsenal
kingfc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 06:13 PM   #43
panerd
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
Wow these announcers are really bad. How could they miss the ref's signaling touchdown and the extra point special teams coming on to the field before finally figuring out a touchdown had been scored? Even their graphics department has touchdown on the screen and the score changed.
panerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 06:14 PM   #44
panerd
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
Now they are trying to justify why they missed the touchdown.

Last edited by panerd : 01-08-2011 at 06:14 PM.
panerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 06:16 PM   #45
frnk55
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by panerd View Post
Wow these announcers are really bad. How could they miss the ref's signaling touchdown and the extra point special teams coming on to the field before finally figuring out a touchdown had been scored? Even their graphics department has touchdown on the screen and the score changed.
Horrible announcers. Idiots.
frnk55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 06:18 PM   #46
whomario
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Seahawk receivers with a couple baaaaaad plays in the 2nd half...
whomario is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 06:20 PM   #47
panerd
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
I have no horse in this race at all and it looks like Seattle has collapased. I could see New Orleans winning by double digits.
panerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 06:23 PM   #48
Matthean
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by panerd View Post
I have no horse in this race at all and it looks like Seattle has collapased. I could see New Orleans winning by double digits.

While 17 points in 12 minutes is possible, it's unlikely.
__________________
Board games: Bringing people back to the original social network, the table.
Matthean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 06:35 PM   #49
GrantDawg
World Champion Mis-speller
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RainMaker View Post
Saturday afternoon is a weird time for the NFL and it's the poorest game of the 4 (at least perception wise). I wouldn't mind seeing Seattle win since there is a chance they'd get to play the Bears next week.


Can you explain how they could play the Bears? The Falcons will get the lowest seed (which gets re-seeded before the games next week), and there is no way the Seahawks won't be the lowest seed.
GrantDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2011, 06:40 PM   #50
panerd
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrantDawg View Post
Can you explain how they could play the Bears? The Falcons will get the lowest seed (which gets re-seeded before the games next week), and there is no way the Seahawks won't be the lowest seed.

I think they stay #4 even though they are the worst team. I vaguely remember something similar happening a few years ago. Cardinals maybe?
panerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.