PDA

View Full Version : Boston: Epstein...we don't need no stinking Epstein.


WrongWay
11-21-2005, 06:26 PM
Check out this trade. Pending Physicals

Boston
Josh Beckett
Mike Lowell

Florida
Hanley Ramirez
And 2 prospects to be named later


I know Florida was looking to unload some salary, but this is rediculous. Unbelievable.

Joe Canadian
11-21-2005, 06:28 PM
Baseball is broken.

st.cronin
11-21-2005, 06:28 PM
hahahahahaha stupid Joe Girardi

If I were in charge of Boston I would be willing to trade my entire farm system for Josh Beckett.

Philliesfan980
11-21-2005, 06:28 PM
Nice trade... Lowell will handcuff you with his salary, and the fact that he's brutal when he's not on the juice, but a small price to pay for one of the better young arms in the league. You just hope that the Marlins didn't overwork him too much in his younger years. They've been known to do that.

vex
11-21-2005, 06:29 PM
Nice trade for the Sox.

Draft Dodger
11-21-2005, 06:30 PM
Baseball is broken.

sure is

dawgfan
11-21-2005, 06:30 PM
Check out this trade. Pending Physicals

Boston
Josh Beckett
Mike Lowell

Florida
Hanley Ramirez
And 2 prospects to be named later


I know Florida was looking to unload some salary, but this is rediculous. Unbelievable.

Boston has some top-notch pitching prospects. If this trade includes someone like Jon Papelbon then I think Florida has done OK in the deal.

jeff061
11-21-2005, 06:32 PM
Talking heads on WEEI slamming this trade something awful as being bad for Boston. Probably wouldn't be saying a thing if Theo was around though. Damn near impossible to get a quality starter these days and the only way Renteria is going anywhere is if he all of a sudden gets a lot better. In which case he's no longer a concern. That and apparently Hanley has a major attitude problem.

So yeah, I'm for it.

Edit: Better not include Papelbon though.

WrongWay
11-21-2005, 06:32 PM
The only thing I couldn't find out was if there is any money involved in the trade.

Philliesfan980
11-21-2005, 06:33 PM
Beckett has issues staying healthy. I'm not so sure this is as much as a slam dunk as people think.

Mr. Wednesday
11-21-2005, 06:33 PM
Nice trade... Lowell will handcuff you with his salary, and the fact that he's brutal when he's not on the juice, but a small price to pay for one of the better young arms in the league. You just hope that the Marlins didn't overwork him too much in his younger years. They've been known to do that.I believe his DL stints (typ. for a blister on the middle finger of his pitching hand) have kept his inning totals down.

Philliesfan980
11-21-2005, 06:35 PM
I believe his DL stints (typ. for a blister on the middle finger of his pitching hand) have kept his inning totals down.

Good point. The way they abuse D-train, and the fact that he has a funky delivery, I'll be surprised if Dontrell is still pitching when he's 31-32.

Mr. Wednesday
11-21-2005, 06:36 PM
Dola, my understanding is that aside from those blister issues, he has been on the DL once with an elbow sprain, once with a lower back strain, and once with an oblique strain.

st.cronin
11-21-2005, 06:37 PM
There is no pitching prospect anywhere worth a tenth of Josh Beckett.

Philliesfan980
11-21-2005, 06:37 PM
Dola, my understanding is that aside from those blister issues, he has been on the DL once with an elbow sprain, once with a lower back strain, and once with an oblique strain.

Yeah, I thought it was more than just the blister.

But with pitchers today, its really a crap shoot. When you get an opportunity to get a guy like him, you have to take a chance.

WrongWay
11-21-2005, 06:38 PM
Yeah, the only knock on Beckett has been the Blisters. He is a top 5 pitcher otherwise.

Mr. Wednesday
11-21-2005, 06:39 PM
Talking heads on WEEI slamming this trade something awful as being bad for Boston.As if we needed further proof that WEEI is a den of idiots.

panerd
11-21-2005, 06:39 PM
Dammit. I got Beckett cheap in a fantasy league. Trade him to an NL team please!

And I thought Hanley Ramirez was some slam that I couldn't understand about Manny Ramerez. Are the Marlins serious?

Mr. Wednesday
11-21-2005, 06:40 PM
Hanley's generally considered to be one of the best position prospects in the Sox system.

Rich1033
11-21-2005, 06:41 PM
I dont like it for Boston. I wouldnt take on a horrible contract and trade 2 top prospects for a guy with injury problems and a 3.83 road ERA.

henry296
11-21-2005, 06:42 PM
The one pitcher is supposed to be Anibel Sanchez who was lights out this year in the minors.

st.cronin
11-21-2005, 06:43 PM
I dont like it for Boston. I wouldnt take on a horrible contract and trade 2 top prospects for a guy with injury problems and a 3.83 road ERA.

Boston, like NY, can afford to take on a bad contract.

There are less than 50 decent pitchers in the history of baseball that didn't have injury problems from 20-25.

A 3.83 road era is very, very good.

Mr. Wednesday
11-21-2005, 06:46 PM
Beckett's injury problems consist of recurring blisters on his right middle finger. Even if he continues to have trouble with those, I'd have to think that it's not the sort of thing that does more than cost him a DL stretch or two in the middle of the season.

dawgfan
11-21-2005, 06:50 PM
There is no pitching prospect anywhere worth a tenth of Josh Beckett.

I'm not sure if this was supposed to be sarcasm, but it's a long ways from being true.

jeff061
11-21-2005, 06:50 PM
And I thought Hanley Ramirez was some slam that I couldn't understand about Manny Ramerez. Are the Marlins serious?

If the hype is to be believed Hanley will be a All Star caliber SS within a few years. I'm not sure I believe it. I've been wondering if they've been hyping him with the sole purpose of trading him in mind.

st.cronin
11-21-2005, 06:51 PM
I'm not sure if this was supposed to be sarcasm, but it's a long ways from being true.

It is not sarcasm. Betting on young pitchers is ALWAYS a suckers bet.

dawgfan
11-21-2005, 06:55 PM
It is not sarcasm. Betting on young pitchers is ALWAYS a suckers bet.

I'll take Felix Hernandez any day over Josh Beckett.

st.cronin
11-21-2005, 06:57 PM
I'll take Felix Hernandez any day over Josh Beckett.

2 points

1. Felix Hernandez is not a prospect; he is a major league pitcher, who has proven himself against major league hitters.

2. I would still take Beckett over him.

Mr. Wednesday
11-21-2005, 06:58 PM
Word is, Beckett + Lowell to the Sox for Ramirez + Sanchez + another prospect.

Mr. Wednesday
11-21-2005, 06:58 PM
Dola, I'm a big fan of this trade from the Boston side of things.

kcchief19
11-21-2005, 07:05 PM
Beckett's injury problems consist of recurring blisters on his right middle finger. Even if he continues to have trouble with those, I'd have to think that it's not the sort of thing that does more than cost him a DL stretch or two in the middle of the season. Other than in four seasons he's be on the DL nine times. I'm perplexed by the hype with Beckett. He's an outstanding prospect, but last season was the first year he'd made more than 26 starts -- only 29 -- and won more than nine ball games. I'd still label him an outstanding prospect, since he has not yet shown he has the durability and attitude to be a depending frontline starter. Counting on Beckett to head your rotation is a gamble right now.

That said, I'm perplexed by this deal. On the one hand, it's possible that the Marlins could find no one willing to take on Lowell's salary, which would mean including him in a Beckett deal. It sounds like that is what killed the Rangers deal with Blalock for Beckett -- the Marlins wanted a pitching prospect in return if they couldn't unload Lowell.

If this was the only way to move Lowell's salary, then this is probably the best deal the Marlins could get. They could probably have gotten more for Beckett alone, but if unloading Lowell is a priority, then that's what you have to do.

The blister problem seems to be a common injury issue. Same thing with Jeremy Affeldt here in KC. Not as good as an arm as Beckett, but he's had the same injury issue that has really setback his career.

miami_fan
11-21-2005, 07:11 PM
This is really simple from the Marlins point of view. With no chance at a new stadium (even before the hurricane IMO), they simply could not afford Lowell's contract. I think you can expect them to dump more contracts and make another run in two years IF they are still in South Florida in that time frame

Ksyrup
11-21-2005, 07:12 PM
I think that's a good trade for both teams. As for the Marlins situation, I posted an article in the offseason thread that explains their problem - South Florida fans suck. They simply don't deserve a team.

dawgfan
11-21-2005, 07:28 PM
2 points

1. Felix Hernandez is not a prospect; he is a major league pitcher, who has proven himself against major league hitters.

2. I would still take Beckett over him.

Hernandez has only pitched 84 major league innings, but fine, I'll play along. Give me a few days and I can identify at least 10 pitching prospects that are at least 75% of Beckett. I understand the whole idea that pitching prospects are very unreliable and much more difficult to predict than position players, but the idea that there are no pitching prospects worth 1/10th of Josh Beckett is pure hyperbole.

As for Beckett vs. Hernandez, while I think Beckett is a terrific talent and has done very well so far given his age, I'd still take Hernandez. Beckett has yet to pitch more than 180 innings in a season and has a history of injuries beyond just his notable blister problems. He's been dominant in the minors and very good in the majors, but he started his minor league career at a more advanced age than Felix was when he made it to the majors. Felix, if he stays healthy, is going to be a Hall of Famer, multiple-Cy Young winner. His combination of strikeout rate and groundball rate is extremely rare - he's already at a level comperable to where Kevin Brown was in his peak years.

Mr. Wednesday
11-21-2005, 07:56 PM
Beckett has yet to pitch more than 180 innings in a season and has a history of injuries beyond just his notable blister problems.I'm not sure what injury history you're referring to -- someone on another site dug up his DL history, and the non-blister (or non-related) injuries totaled the three that I posted above, none of which repeated.

dawgfan
11-21-2005, 08:02 PM
I'm not sure what injury history you're referring to -- someone on another site dug up his DL history, and the non-blister (or non-related) injuries totaled the three that I posted above, none of which repeated.

The blister problem is troublesome by itself, considering he's never pitched more than 180 innings in an MLB season. Beyond that, issues with an elbow strain are scary - any prior injury history involving the arm of a pitcher is a cautionary flag. The back and oblique strains are slightly less troubling, but they could become recurring issues, and they might indicate underlying issues with his mechanics.

He may rattle off 3 straight full seasons with no injury issues, but until he does so he has to be considered a moderate injury risk given his history of missing games, even if the vast majority are due to blister issues. Missing a start is missing a start.

WrongWay
11-21-2005, 08:13 PM
So, how many times has Beckett pitched fewer than 100 innings in a season?

Sorry, but I think Beckett is about as close to a sure thing as you can get for a young pitcher in Baseball.

jeff061
11-21-2005, 08:14 PM
And I'm not sure how realistic it is to be writing someone's ticket to the hall(barring injury) after 84 innings.

WrongWay
11-21-2005, 08:18 PM
Here, try to spot the trend in Becket's career

2001 FLA 24.0
2002 FLA 107.2
2003 FLA 142.0
2004 FLA 156.2
2005 FLA 178.2

I don't know about you, but I think I can see a pattern here. :)

dawgfan
11-21-2005, 08:42 PM
Here, try to spot the trend in Becket's career

2001 FLA 24.0
2002 FLA 107.2
2003 FLA 142.0
2004 FLA 156.2
2005 FLA 178.2

I don't know about you, but I think I can see a pattern here. :)

Yeah, a pattern of not being able to pitch a full season. Despite Beckett's great peformance when he's been healthy, he hasn't been healthy enough to provide elite value to his team. Let's compare his VORP to someone like Freddy Garcia:

2005: Beckett: 36.2; Garcia: 45.6
2004: Beckett: 28.3; Garcia: 35.1
2003: Beckett: 35.9; Garcia: 27.1
2002: Beckett: 9.8; Garcia: 38.7

There's no question that when healthy, Beckett is a better pitcher than Garcia. The problem is he's not been healthy nearly as often, and Garcia has actually provided more value to his teams than Beckett has.

Look, I think Beckett is one of the premium young pitchers in the game, but his inability to pitch a full season hurts his value and is a cause for concern.

DaddyTorgo
11-21-2005, 10:28 PM
i don't think i like this trade. i'm still not convinced that josh beckett is the answer to anything, and mike lowell is overpaid and underperforming. For Hanley and two more prospects? Seems like the Marlins are making out like kings.

st.cronin
11-21-2005, 10:41 PM
I am reminded of Jim Fregosi plus prospects for Nolan Ryan.

DaddyTorgo
11-21-2005, 10:52 PM
I am reminded of Jim Fregosi plus prospects for Nolan Ryan.
so you're saying Josh Beckett is the next Jim Fregosi?? http://dynamic.gamespy.com/%7Efof/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif

McSweeny
11-22-2005, 12:32 AM
The one pitcher is supposed to be Anibel Sanchez who was lights out this year in the minors.lights out in A ball

little different than beings lights out in the post-season (2.20 ERA) as Beckett has been

Hanley hit .270 in AA. Beckett is 25 and a proven top of the line starter. I am drooling

Young Drachma
11-22-2005, 01:37 AM
Good point. The way they abuse D-train, and the fact that he has a funky delivery, I'll be surprised if Dontrell is still pitching when he's 31-32.

Yah, if I were him, I'd get the hell out of there. Force a trade or something. Because they're gonna dog him out even more this year. What's with Loria's fire sale again? He's such a horrible owner.

Young Drachma
11-22-2005, 01:39 AM
i don't think i like this trade. i'm still not convinced that josh beckett is the answer to anything, and mike lowell is overpaid and underperforming. For Hanley and two more prospects? Seems like the Marlins are making out like kings.

Even if it's just for a year, Ramirez isn't gonna be the next A-Rod or anything. So, the deal, for the short term makes a ton of sense. Like everyone keeps saying, starting pitching is really hard to find. Especially proven starting pitching. And unlike the Blue Jays (my team) that are about to overpay for AJ Burnett, at least Beckett has proven that when he's healthy, he can be a beast.

st.cronin
11-22-2005, 01:44 AM
Somebody picking on this trade from the Sox pov name 10 starting pitchers they would rather have than Josh Beckett, and then we'll check the list at the end of 2006.

SackAttack
11-22-2005, 04:17 AM
Somebody picking on this trade from the Sox pov name 10 starting pitchers they would rather have than Josh Beckett, and then we'll check the list at the end of 2006.

Sandy Koufax, Walter Johnson, Warren Spahn, Don Drysdale, Cy Young...oh, did you mean contemporary pitchers? :D

jeff061
11-22-2005, 06:39 AM
They are saying it's confirmed now, pending a physical. Hanley Ramirez and pitchers Anibal Sánchez and Jesus Delgado for Beckett and Mike Lowell.

I for one am stoke by this deal. Of course John "The Douche Bag" Dennis on EEI was thrashing it this morning. Every caller and Callahan thought it was a great deal though. I need another sports radio for my morning commute, I can't take Dennis.

Ksyrup
11-22-2005, 06:40 AM
What's with Loria's fire sale again? He's such a horrible owner.At the risk of repeating this from the offseason thread, here's an article from Ft. Lauderdale by a guy who is not an owner apologist. He's just telling the truth here:



Don't blame Loria for Marlins' payroll woes</B>



Dave Hyde
Sports Columnist
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=130 align=right bgColor=#e6e6cc border=0><TBODY><TR><TD align=middle><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=120 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=120></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
November 21, 2005

Seasons have changed. Players have changed. Even the Marlins owners have changed, three times, from business-savvy H. Wayne Huizenga to baseball-silly John Henry to Jeffrey Loria, who has been the best mix of sports and business.

But the Marlins' storyline stays the same: Some great teams. Some star players. But no stadium. Not enough fans. Never any financial cavalry coming over the horizon.

And so now it's Josh Beckett and Mike Lowell possibly being salary-dumped to Texas. Carlos Delgado and the $48 million owed him in the next three years are in play in trade talks, too. At least Delgado went public fearing so.

If it all happens, could anyone blame Loria the way everyone once did Huizenga and Henry? By now, it's obvious the first problem baseball has in South Florida isn't an owner, the stadium, afternoon thunderstorms, the dismantling of 1997, the lack of a dome, the angle of the seats, marketing plans for the team, Mike Lowell's slump, any proposed new stadium site or the fact concession stands just don't take credit cards, darn it.

There simply aren't enough paying fans.

That's it. That's the problem in a definitive sentence. And a distinction must be made between "paying fans" and "baseball fans," because the Marlins' TV ratings are strong. TV officials brag about them. Just last spring, a one-of-162 Marlins game outdrew a Heat playoff game. Go figure.

If the Marlins were the Kansas City Royals or Pittsburgh Pirates during the last decade, this constant lack of support would be more understandable. But they've been South Florida's most successful franchise in the past decade. They've won two World Series. That would muster the maximum support possible.

South Florida won't put public money toward a baseball stadium. That's clear, and it's reasonable. But the mystery forever will be why two publicly funded basketball arenas and a hockey arena were built while baseball gets nothing despite providing double the events at the lowest ticket price.

Loria has done more than asked since his arrival in 2002. He answered whether he would dismantle the Marlins by winning the World Series in 2003, and if he'd spend money by first signing Pudge Rodriguez, then Carlos Delgado, and having a middle-of-the-pack payroll of $66 million this year.

Has any franchise been smarter with its money the last few seasons? Any team had more exciting players?

Even this frustrating season, they contended until late September. There wasn't a better ticket in sports than Dontrelle Willis, who finished second in the National League Cy Young voting. Delgado and Miguel Cabrera finished fifth and sixth, respectively, in Most Valuable Player voting.

And they ranked 28th in attendance.

So who can blame Loria for whatever he does? Who says Huizenga's conclusion wasn't right, if his methods heavy-handed? No doubt General Manager Larry Beinfest will trot out the term "payroll flexibility" in discussing any trades of Beckett or Delgado. All smaller-payroll teams do. But Beinfest invented the phrase back in 2002, when starting pitcher Matt Clement and then-closer Antonio Alfonseca were dealt to the Cubs just before the season in a statement of where the Marlins' payroll stood.

Maybe that's the lifeline of hope today. Maybe, like that Cubs deal that brought Willis, any big-salary moves will be part of a greater plan the Marlins have to somehow salvage the future by getting quality youth.

Hank Blalock would fit into that idea. He's a former All-Star third baseman coming off a bad year. Sound familiar? But unlike Lowell, who is 32 and owed $18 million the next two years, Blalock is 25 with a contract totaling $13 million for the next three years.

If Cabrera is blocked once more from returning to his natural position of third base, well, this doesn't look to be an offseason of soft landings for anyone.

For four years, Loria has bumped up against what Huizenga and Henry did. For the past three, he smartly worked around it. And he explained the low attendance this season as, "purely a factor of weather."

Told he was optimistic, he said: "If you don't have a degree of optimism in this business, you couldn't do it."

In this awful baseball market, it's not clear he still can.

Dave Hyde can be reached at [email protected].

<CITE>Copyright © 2005, South Florida Sun-Sentinel (http://www.sun-sentinel.com/)</CITE>

Ragone
11-22-2005, 07:24 AM
Check out this trade. Pending Physicals

Boston
Josh Beckett
Mike Lowell

Florida
Hanley Ramirez
And 2 prospects to be named later


I know Florida was looking to unload some salary, but this is rediculous. Unbelievable.

Clay Dreslough must have made the trade ai for the computer gm for the marlins... or something.. :)

Ksyrup
11-22-2005, 07:48 AM
I don't see what's not to like for either side in this deal. If you start with the proposition that the Marlins have to cut salary, then Mike Lowell is an albatross and Beckett is getting too good for even an arbitration salary. But the only way to get rid of Lowell without paying 75% of his salary is to package him with a marketable commodity, and Beckett is certainly that. In exchange, they get a rookie starting SS, a highly regarded pitching prospect, and another minor league pitcher. They cut salary and fill a hole at SS. The Red Sox give up prospects for a potential replacement #1 starter for Schilling after this year and either a new 3rd baseman, which they need, or trade bait to get someone else they'd rather have (the Twins are reportedly interested in Lowell). Both teams gave up something and took a risk. That's what happens in trades.

miami_fan
11-22-2005, 09:10 AM
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/sports/columnists/dan_le_batard/13230541.htm

We deserve to lose more than Josh Beckett.

We deserve to lose this baseball team.

We are, bar none, the worst major-league city in North America.

We are the only area anywhere on this continent that could draw 800,000 fans below league average for a 2004 defending champion that was playoff-relevant until the season's last month.

Tampa Bay and Kansas City were the only two major-league markets with worse attendance than Florida's last season, but at least their excuse was last place, the two worst records in the league and a combined 71 games out of first.

If the Devil Rays and Royals had been one game ahead of Roger Clemens for the wild card with a month remaining, as the Marlins were, they would have been filling their stadiums as if the seats were made of cash. But last-place Pittsburgh, 33 games out, drew more fans per game than Florida last season. So did last-place Seattle, 26 games out. And last-place Colorado, which fielded a Triple A team last season.

NO APPRECIATION

Spoiled South Florida has zero appreciation for what the Marlins have given us. This team has won two championships in the past decade. That's as many as the White Sox and Red Sox have combined in the past 90 years. No South Florida sports franchise has earned our support more than this one. But taxpayers have built not one but two basketball arenas a few blocks from each other and a hockey arena for a sport with very little following here while never giving the Marlins anything beyond a yawn.

So now Beckett and Mike Lowell go to Boston for prospects and promises, and it feels like the first step in a bitter, sad, painful dismantling. Can't blame management. It has done everything it possibly can, bleeding money. Owner Jeffrey Loria has spent plenty on baseball. The same can't be said for South Florida. So don't complain if Beckett is only the first pebble in an avalanche that sends this entire franchise eventually out of town.

We lead the league in excuses. Too much rain. Too much heat. Don't like where the park is. It's a stadium built for football. (Cue the baby wailing here.) All those things were true in 1993, too, when the Marlins drew 37,838 a game for a bad team.

It wasn't less hot or less wet then. Where did the people go? Thirty-four bucks for four tickets, four hot dogs, four sodas and a program is about the best value in South Florida entertainment. If we were as good at support as we are at making excuses, the Marlins would be the Yankees. Baseball continues to set attendance records while South Florida sets indifferent records. Again, no city in North America could win this way and draw this poorly. Not one.

Wayne Huizenga didn't let the feel-good of 1997 echo into 1998 before his fire sale. But Loria let the cheers of 2003 echo into 2004 and 2005, trying to build a fan base, and we failed him, so now it looks like he is giving up. There likely will be a lot of noise in coming days from the likes of Carlos Delgado if he is traded about betrayal and lies, and it will make for easy headlines, but Loria deserves no wrath here.

LORIA SABOTAGED

He was sabotaged by a bad stadium, a bad lease, an indifferent fan base, an underachieving team and too many

politicians who spent a lot of time in the great seats during the World Series and in front of the cameras at the parade but got good and lost when it came time to find the few extra million that separated this team from its new stadium.

The Marlins will be worse in 2006. That seems inevitable. The prospects from Boston are good, but you can't win at this level with Jason Vargas as your second starter when you wheeze to 83-79 with him as your fourth guy behind Beckett and A.J. Burnett.

Beckett is a loss that stings more than the departures of Moises Alou or Pudge Rodriguez or Derrek Lee, because he is an overwhelming, young arm headed into its prime. He has the kind of stuff, confidence and youth that could make him an All-Star for the next decade.

Alas, all his future success will have to be elsewhere.

Not unlike this entire Marlins team.


For those of you who are un-familiar with Le Batard, he is one of the biggest homers/apologist in the South Florida media. You can actually take his criticism to the nth power. I am pretty confident that I have been to more Marlins games in the last five years (15-20) than at least 85 percent of the population in South Florida and I only made it down their 2 weeks out of the year during that time. Pathetic

Ksyrup
11-22-2005, 09:22 AM
I agree. Dave Hyde's article, which I posted on the first page, reads almost exactly the same way. I don't even live in South Florida, but I've been to 3 games in the past 3 years, which is more than I bet a lot of so-called baseball fans who live within 30 minutes of the stadium have been to.

JasonC23
11-22-2005, 10:02 AM
Baseball is not broken in this case, Florida is.

Crapshoot
11-22-2005, 10:12 AM
Eh LaBatard is one of the few good writers out there, willing to channel some degree of intelligence into his work, unlike the plaskhe's, Woody Paige's, or Jay Mariotti's of the world. One person does not a fanbase make.

Coop
11-22-2005, 10:38 AM
I went to 8 marlins games and I live in fucking New Jersey. Probably more than those so called 'fans' in Florida. The marlins need to move.

stevew
11-22-2005, 11:22 AM
They should move the Marlins somewhere like Jersey/NY. That metro area could likely support another team. Even if it wasnt as supported as even the Mets are, it would still be bigger than it is in Florida.

Coop
11-22-2005, 05:01 PM
They should move the Marlins somewhere like Jersey/NY. That metro area could likely support another team. Even if it wasnt as supported as even the Mets are, it would still be bigger than it is in Florida.
That would be awesome

miami_fan
10-12-2007, 08:02 PM
Bump

I think the Marlins got robbed in this one.:(

Buccaneer
10-12-2007, 08:12 PM
A lot of you were wrong.

Crapshoot
10-12-2007, 08:24 PM
No, it was a win win - The Marlins got the guy who may have been the best player in the NL this year (Hanley Ramirez), and a few useful arms (Anibal Sanchez was pretty good last year). More importantly, they dumped $13 million in salary (from their perspective). The Red Sox "won" because of Lowell turning in an amazing performance, but the cost in dollars was a lot higher.

ThunderingHERD
10-12-2007, 08:27 PM
Yeh, I'm confused...seems to me like it turned out better for the Marlins than anybody expected.

lighthousekeeper
10-12-2007, 08:28 PM
yeah looks kinda like a win-win (at least the closest thing to a win that the Marlins could have hoped for in a losing situation).

Regardless, this was a great read; didn't catch it the first time around!

Young Drachma
10-12-2007, 08:33 PM
I still think moving the Marlins would be awesome.

Toddzilla
10-12-2007, 08:37 PM
Seems like everyone who thought this was a bad trade - for either side - was very very wrong. The Sox added the SP they needed, and the Marlins got arguably the best all-around player in the NL...Jose Reyes goes to sleep at night and dreams he was as good as Hanley Ramirez.

Rizon
10-12-2007, 10:14 PM
Fat Fuck Wayne Huizinga may be business savy, but he has almost no knowledge of football and is one of the worst owners in the NFL. I hope that asshole dies.

Rizon
10-12-2007, 10:15 PM
Fat Fuck Wayne Huizinga may be business savy, but he has almost no knowledge of football and is one of the worst owners in the NFL. I hope that asshole dies.

Dola,

And I hope that fat fuck SUFFERS. I'd shit on his grave.

ISiddiqui
10-12-2007, 10:23 PM
Yeh, I'm confused...seems to me like it turned out better for the Marlins than anybody expected.

Yep, Hanley turned out to be one of the best players in the game, add that to the salary saved, and a decent pitcher in Anibel Sanchez, and the Marlins didn't do too badly at all.

Galaxy
10-12-2007, 10:26 PM
I still think moving the Marlins would be awesome.

To where? I'm suprised at the Marlins inability to build a bigger base than it has, because in South Florida.

Galaril
10-13-2007, 12:02 AM
Here is an interesting trade someone in the Boston media mentioned. Papelbon, Bucholtz and Lester for Johann Santana and some prospects.

BishopMVP
10-13-2007, 12:15 AM
Here is an interesting trade someone in the Boston media mentioned. Papelbon, Bucholtz and Lester for Johann Santana and some prospects.Haha. Not going to happen. As good as Santana is, we're not trading away 3 of our 6 most important pitchers next year for one player. Buchholz and Papelbon are both off the table.

And I'll agree this trade worked out great for both sides. Hanley looks like a future HOF'er and Beckett is an ace we needed to compete for the WS.

DaddyTorgo
10-13-2007, 12:26 AM
Here is an interesting trade someone in the Boston media mentioned. Papelbon, Bucholtz and Lester for Johann Santana and some prospects.

the RS front office would have to be stupid to do that. And they're not stupid.

Logan
10-13-2007, 08:26 AM
Somewhere, both Michelle Wie and Elmo are smiling.

miami_fan
10-13-2007, 09:00 AM
yeah looks kinda like a win-win (at least the closest thing to a win that the Marlins could have hoped for in a losing situation).
Regardless, this was a great read; didn't catch it the first time around!

That was my point. It was a losing situation. Do I like the fact that the Marlins got Hanley in this deal? Absolutely, I love it. But as of right now the Marlins traded a potential Cy Young winner and an All Star third baseman for an All Star shortstop and.....well we don't know yet. Sanchez just had shoulder surgery , Garcia and Delgado are still unknowns. Could Sanchez come back and be an ace? Maybe. Could Delgado and Garcia be shutdown arms in the pen? Sure, anything is possible. However as it stands right now, I don't think that is a trade the Marlins make with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight. Oh yeah, let me not forget the money that was saved.:rolleyes:

Just seeing Beckett and Lowell playing so well is a bit depressing.:(

sterlingice
10-13-2007, 09:16 AM
I'd like to put forth that I was on record multiple times that offseason wondering why the Marlins were salary dumping Lowell and thus devaluing the pitchers they were trying to trade. :)

http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/showthread.php?p=965444
http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/showthread.php?p=840548
http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/showthread.php?p=839659

SI