PDA

View Full Version : College Football -- Week 1 Thread


Pages : 1 [2] 3

Karlifornia
09-04-2010, 08:33 PM
Same ol' Bruins!

Swaggs
09-04-2010, 08:33 PM
LSU has some serious speed.

RedKingGold
09-04-2010, 08:44 PM
I think LSU has a "playa" at QB. I like that guy a lot so far.

MrBug708
09-04-2010, 08:48 PM
Same ol' Bruins!

Well actually this is something new

Tigercat
09-04-2010, 08:57 PM
I think LSU has a "playa" at QB. I like that guy a lot so far.

Eh. Jefferson is my boy, since he went to my HS. But while he has improved, I don't think he will ever be the complete package at QB.

IMO of course, LSU has the best offensive and defensive athlete in the nation. Russell Shepard has Harvin's skill set, but is even faster. Patrick Peterson has elite CB athletic ability on a 6'1 222 frame. The story of the game is that Miles and company has found the way to put those guys in a position to win a game. They have to be the playmakers, not Jefferson. Don't know if we can compete for the SEC with Jefferson at QB and our current OL, but with Peterson and Shepard it should be a fun ride this year.

Noop
09-04-2010, 09:04 PM
For those who don't follow FCS, Jacksonville State is a solid program. They almost beat Florida State last year. Would have been a playoff team but were ruled ineligible by the NCAA for grade issues.

It felt like a lost at the time.

the_meanstrosity
09-04-2010, 09:08 PM
The Turner Gill era at Kansas has started off with a loss to North Dakota State, 6-3. I wish I could tell you North Dakota State played incredible, but that clearly wasn't the case and in fact tried to give Kansas the game on multiple occasions only to have Kansas give it right back. Ugh.

RainMaker
09-04-2010, 09:18 PM
As someone who follows D2, the Dakotas have always had solid football programs. Kind of underated and overlooked, but it's a passionate football part of the country that flies under the radar. They have some solid players, coaches, and fans. They've all moved up to FCS, but I can tell you that NDSU has a strong athletics department.

Edit: I also may be one of the only people here who has been to a game at the Fargodome.

MrBug708
09-04-2010, 09:30 PM
Good win for BYU. Tough for Dawgfan

Karlifornia
09-04-2010, 09:35 PM
The PAC-10 continues to get humbled OOC. Who's gonna step up?

sovereignstar
09-04-2010, 09:41 PM
Edit: I also may be one of the only people here who has been to a game at the Fargodome.

There are at least 3 others on this board that have been to a game at the FD (including me).

SirFozzie
09-04-2010, 09:43 PM
didn't know it was illegal to kick the ball out of your own endzone

SirFozzie
09-04-2010, 09:46 PM
dola:And that should do it.

RainMaker
09-04-2010, 09:54 PM
There are at least 3 others on this board that have been to a game at the FD (including me).
Sweet, didn't know we had anyone up in that area.

MrBug708
09-04-2010, 09:58 PM
The PAC-10 continues to get humbled OOC. Who's gonna step up?

We tried to schedule Sac State but they were busy this weekend :)

Karlifornia
09-04-2010, 10:15 PM
We tried to schedule Sac State but they were busy this weekend :)

When Stanford beats you next week, just don't try to blame it on Karl Dorrell.

dawgfan
09-04-2010, 10:21 PM
[sigh]

Just too many unforced mistakes in this game, especially on special teams, and Locker proves that the hype machine is ahead of his game.

Props to BYU - they got the better of us on the LOS on both sides for the most part. I feared that we would lack any kind of pass-rush with Daniel Te'o-Nesheim graduated, and that proved true against what seemed to be a pretty good BYU OL. Our blitzes were ineffective, and credit to Nelson for finding DiLuigi exploiting the blown zone coverage on one of our blitzes.

And our best CB badly misplayed a long pass - if he'd tracked the ball, he could've had an easy pick, but instead he ran away from the pass and into the WR for a silly PI call.

Chris Polk looked pretty good, but once again our O-line doesn't seem to be able to consistently get push, and Sark didn't appear to have a lot of confidence in them, opting for more passes. Locker was good, but not great. Really bad decision on that 4th and 2 early in the 4th quarter - he wanted Polk and when he was initially covered he panicked and threw a low percentage pass to Kearse long; if he'd displayed a little more patience, he would've seen that Polk slipped past the LB, and all Locker had to do was gently loft the pass over the LB and Polk would've had the 1st down with plenty to spare.

And Locker panicked on that last 4th down play also, locking in on Izbicki who was double-covered and firing low where it was batted at the LOS.

Jake is better than he was before Sark arrived, but he's not a Heisman candidate, and he needs some more work to justify the 1st overall selection hype.

Just to be clear, BYU earned that win. But it was frustrating to see so many unforced errors and dumb plays on our part.

MacroGuru
09-04-2010, 10:26 PM
[sigh]

Just too many unforced mistakes in this game, especially on special teams, and Locker proves that the hype machine is ahead of his game.

Props to BYU - they got the better of us on the LOS on both sides for the most part. I feared that we would lack any kind of pass-rush with Daniel Te'o-Nesheim graduated, and that proved true against what seemed to be a pretty good BYU OL. Our blitzes were ineffective, and credit to Nelson for finding DiLuigi exploiting the blown zone coverage on one of our blitzes.

And our best CB badly misplayed a long pass - if he'd tracked the ball, he could've had an easy pick, but instead he ran away from the pass and into the WR for a silly PI call.

Chris Polk looked pretty good, but once again our O-line doesn't seem to be able to consistently get push, and Sark didn't appear to have a lot of confidence in them, opting for more passes. Locker was good, but not great. Really bad decision on that 4th and 2 early in the 4th quarter - he wanted Polk and when he was initially covered he panicked and threw a low percentage pass to Kearse long; if he'd displayed a little more patience, he would've seen that Polk slipped past the LB, and all Locker had to do was gently loft the pass over the LB and Polk would've had the 1st down with plenty to spare.

And Locker panicked on that last 4th down play also, locking in on Izbicki who was double-covered and firing low where it was batted at the LOS.

Jake is better than he was before Sark arrived, but he's not a Heisman candidate, and he needs some more work to justify the 1st overall selection hype.

Just to be clear, BYU earned that win. But it was frustrating to see so many unforced errors and dumb plays on our part.

And here I was thinking we sucked it up...I think Nielsen should be our QB right now...Heaps did decent and has a great arm...But Nielsen's legs buys the time and adds that extra dimension we needed.

As for Washington...Polk is a stud and you guys went away from him to much...Just
use him to pound it and we are losing this game.


Also, our entire front seven was brand new and we got absolutely no pressure on Locker..I hope to hell we step it up.

Glengoyne
09-04-2010, 10:39 PM
Fresno making a run to get back into the game here at halftime. Neither team is looking great so far, but some standout individual plays.

Karlifornia
09-04-2010, 10:41 PM
LSU/UNC not quite over yet

mckerney
09-04-2010, 10:44 PM
LSU/UNC not quite over yet

Wow, LSU picks up the first down yardage that will let them take a knee, but then fumble.

RainMaker
09-04-2010, 10:52 PM
Wow, what a finish. Gutsy performance by NC. Had their chances to win that.

RedKingGold
09-04-2010, 11:03 PM
God, I love football.

the_meanstrosity
09-04-2010, 11:07 PM
As someone who follows D2, the Dakotas have always had solid football programs. Kind of underated and overlooked, but it's a passionate football part of the country that flies under the radar. They have some solid players, coaches, and fans. They've all moved up to FCS, but I can tell you that NDSU has a strong athletics department.

Edit: I also may be one of the only people here who has been to a game at the Fargodome.

North Dakota State has certainly had some football success in their recent history, but this is a squad coming off a 3-8 season and a 6-5 season before that. They were a solid team, but they tried to give Kansas the game with numerous drive saving penalties and Kansas couldn't even do that. It looks like a long season for Kansas football with Gill and Long at the helm. The offense is just very predictable running straight up the gut on every other play.

MJ4H
09-04-2010, 11:37 PM
today is my favorite day

dawgfan
09-04-2010, 11:43 PM
And here I was thinking we sucked it up...I think Nielsen should be our QB right now...Heaps did decent and has a great arm...But Nielsen's legs buys the time and adds that extra dimension we needed.
Heaps showed pretty good poise for a true frosh QB, and he's got a stronger arm than I was led to believe from the recruiting scouting reports. But yeah, Nelson looked good - he was fairly accurate, made good decisions, and his feet give him an added dimension.

I would guess Mendenhall keeps the rotating QB situation until forced out of it. Why not season Heaps if he can as long as the offense performs with both playing?

As for Washington...Polk is a stud and you guys went away from him to much...Just
use him to pound it and we are losing this game.
I love Polk. But we just couldn't seem to count on our OL to consistently open up holes for him. I felt like we should have run him more, but when we did run late in the game it wasn't very successful.

I had/have hopes that another year of strength and conditioning and coaching would result in noticeable improvement in our OL, but they didn't look all that great to me. Given all the losses that BYU had in their front 7 from last year, I thought we'd have a better chance at controlling the LOS and grinding out a win on the ground with Polk.

I dunno, maybe if Sark had committed to it more it might have proved to work, but I could understand why he leaned to the passing game.

Also, our entire front seven was brand new and we got absolutely no pressure on Locker..I hope to hell we step it up.
True, though it is hard to get to Locker given his wheels. Still, I think you guys got a couple of sacks on him.

I'll be curious to see how BYU looks the rest of the season to gauge how badly I should feel about the Dawgs losing this one...

SirFozzie
09-04-2010, 11:57 PM
Wow, last year the Fresno State Bulldogs had 9 sacks TOTAL. This game against Cincy? FIVE.

mauchow
09-05-2010, 12:05 AM
Badgers lookin' just fine after a weird first half where the Rebels had more points (14) than yards (12).

RainMaker
09-05-2010, 12:12 AM
North Dakota State has certainly had some football success in their recent history, but this is a squad coming off a 3-8 season and a 6-5 season before that. They were a solid team, but they tried to give Kansas the game with numerous drive saving penalties and Kansas couldn't even do that. It looks like a long season for Kansas football with Gill and Long at the helm. The offense is just very predictable running straight up the gut on every other play.
Yeah, I remember them and the other Dakotas more for what they did in D2. I think they'll all eventually become players in FCS in the near future.

RainMaker
09-05-2010, 12:14 AM
today is my favorite day
No shit. Looking forward to next week even more when we get a taste of each. You don't realize how much you miss football until it starts up.

Glengoyne
09-05-2010, 12:44 AM
Wow, last year the Fresno State Bulldogs had 9 sacks TOTAL. This game against Cincy? FIVE.
As much as I'd like to say that this was all FSU, I'm afraid that Brian Kelly is being sorely missed in Cinci.

Izulde
09-05-2010, 04:26 AM
Quick comments on the Badgers/UNLV game for the UNLV end of things:

Our defense has the potential to be pretty good this year, I think. Don't let that 41-21 scoreline fool you. One of Wisky's TDs came on a fumble return and much of the yardage and the Badgers' offensive TDs came as a result of the defense having to be on the field so damned much. RB Johnny Clay did decently for the Park pride thing, though he didn't hear me or ignored me even when I started singing the Panthers alma mater, but really the Rebels' defense did well all things considered.

DB Will Chandler is my favorite Rebel after watching him return an interception 19 yards for a TD to make it a 14-7 game and just before the first half ended, returning a fumble 82 yards to set up the TD to make it 17-14 at the half and give us a fighting chance.

Our offense, on the other hand, was horrible. Like so bad it was one of the worst offenses I've ever seen in a football game and probably couldn't score on a high school defense. QB Mike Clausen was excruciatingly bad. He kept hanging on to the football and got sacked at least 3 or 4 times and when he did throw, they were usually bad ones. His only decent pass was a 16 yarder to WR Philip Payne for that late first half TD.

Payne ended up with 4 catches for 71 yards and a TD and it's safe to say he'll be our biggest offensive weapon. Made a good leap on the TD catch too that I tried to get with my camera but didn't catch.

QB Omar Clayton, who I thought would win the starting job, did quite a bit better and actually got the offense moving some after he replaced Clausen in the third. Here's to hoping he's the starter next game. I wish he wasn't a senior because our QB talent level is horrific.

MLB Ronnie Paulo had a game-high 11 tackles. He was expected to be the best player on the defense, if not the team, before the season began, so I'll be excited to watch his final season. I'm also happy Chandler and Payne are only juniors, so I'll get to see a couple years of them.

But yeah, so far it's looking like we'll have a pretty good defense and a god-awful offense that I hope will improve as Clayton, Payne and the rest of them get used to the new system. Our schedule is absolutely brutal this year, so I don't see us winning more than 4 games.

If we have a winning record, I'll consider it a fantastic season. If we go to a bowl game, I'll call it a miracle first year for Coach Hauck.

Logan
09-05-2010, 06:35 AM
Syracuse may have had the "best" win of the day by dominating Akron on the road. Not a huge win, but it has been awhile since Syracuse has whipped someone in such convincing fashion.

I wish that was true :(.

Dr. Sak
09-05-2010, 08:31 AM
Hey UW fans...I think I will be out for the Apple Cup. My friend goes to school there and I usually take a yearly visit to Seattle to visit him...he got us tickets for that game! I'm pretty pumped!

Lathum
09-05-2010, 08:50 AM
Hey UW fans...I think I will be out for the Apple Cup. My friend goes to school there and I usually take a yearly visit to Seattle to visit him...he got us tickets for that game! I'm pretty pumped!

sweet, maybe we can grab a beer.

mauchow
09-05-2010, 09:06 AM
Quick comments on the Badgers/UNLV game for the UNLV end of things:

Our defense has the potential to be pretty good this year, I think. Don't let that 41-21 scoreline fool you. One of Wisky's TDs came on a fumble return and much of the yardage and the Badgers' offensive TDs came as a result of the defense having to be on the field so damned much. RB Johnny Clay did decently for the Park pride thing, though he didn't hear me or ignored me even when I started singing the Panthers alma mater, but really the Rebels' defense did well all things considered.

DB Will Chandler is my favorite Rebel after watching him return an interception 19 yards for a TD to make it a 14-7 game and just before the first half ended, returning a fumble 82 yards to set up the TD to make it 17-14 at the half and give us a fighting chance.

Our offense, on the other hand, was horrible. Like so bad it was one of the worst offenses I've ever seen in a football game and probably couldn't score on a high school defense. QB Mike Clausen was excruciatingly bad. He kept hanging on to the football and got sacked at least 3 or 4 times and when he did throw, they were usually bad ones. His only decent pass was a 16 yarder to WR Philip Payne for that late first half TD.

Payne ended up with 4 catches for 71 yards and a TD and it's safe to say he'll be our biggest offensive weapon. Made a good leap on the TD catch too that I tried to get with my camera but didn't catch.

QB Omar Clayton, who I thought would win the starting job, did quite a bit better and actually got the offense moving some after he replaced Clausen in the third. Here's to hoping he's the starter next game. I wish he wasn't a senior because our QB talent level is horrific.

MLB Ronnie Paulo had a game-high 11 tackles. He was expected to be the best player on the defense, if not the team, before the season began, so I'll be excited to watch his final season. I'm also happy Chandler and Payne are only juniors, so I'll get to see a couple years of them.

But yeah, so far it's looking like we'll have a pretty good defense and a god-awful offense that I hope will improve as Clayton, Payne and the rest of them get used to the new system. Our schedule is absolutely brutal this year, so I don't see us winning more than 4 games.

If we have a winning record, I'll consider it a fantastic season. If we go to a bowl game, I'll call it a miracle first year for Coach Hauck.

Wisconsin's game plan was pretty simple. Run, run, run, control the TOP.

You say don't be fooled by the score because of a fumble returned for a touchdown... well the Badgers fumbled the ball on the 1 yard line and the Rebels returned that one 82 yards and scored on the following play.. that makes your point moot.

Almost all the yardage for the Rebels came in the final 20 minutes of the game when the Badgers were already starting to rest their starters so if everything stayed the same, UNLV may not have even gained 100 yards and could have only had 14 points and the Badgers may have ended up with 50+ points.

It was complete domination aside from two huge mistakes(pick six, fumble returned 80 yards). The result was to be expected from a very good Badger football team.

John Clay is one FAT mofo though. He will lose about 10-15 pounds by Big Ten play and will look a little better come that time. James White on the other hand looked like the best running back on the Badgers and that's over John Clay who won the BTPOY last season. Pretty sweet problem to have for the Badgers.

Dr. Sak
09-05-2010, 09:11 AM
sweet, maybe we can grab a beer.

Heck ya...will let you know.

sterlingice
09-05-2010, 09:30 AM
The Turner Gill era at Kansas has started off with a loss to North Dakota State, 6-3. I wish I could tell you North Dakota State played incredible, but that clearly wasn't the case and in fact tried to give Kansas the game on multiple occasions only to have Kansas give it right back. Ugh.

I mean, I knew this year would be tough as we lost a lot of graduating talent last year (which was such a missed opportunity as I thought we should have been so much better last year), but...

SI

Noop
09-05-2010, 09:31 AM
Was there any team that impressed you guys opening weekend?

I know I am being a homer but for me it was Florida State. Its been a long time since we looked like an actual team with a plan and a pulse.

The team that unimpressed me are actually a few.

Florida - It is going to be a long season for them. I guess that offense really aint nothing without Tebow and Harvin.

LSU - Les Miles can not coach. LSU has talent but they are so inconsistent and it is maddening.

MrBug708
09-05-2010, 09:36 AM
When Stanford beats you next week, just don't try to blame it on Karl Dorrell.

Just you wait...

MizzouRah
09-05-2010, 10:05 AM
Gettis just had a pretty amazing pick for Mizzou

We had good seats.. boring first half for sure, but Mizzou played great in the 2nd half.

Going to be an interesting season for sure.

JonInMiddleGA
09-05-2010, 10:08 AM
I mean, I knew this year would be tough as we lost a lot of graduating talent last year (which was such a missed opportunity as I thought we should have been so much better last year), but...

Take heart, there's reason for some hope next week. Sounds as though the GT defense can cure a lot of offensive ills.

Izulde
09-05-2010, 10:49 AM
Wisconsin's game plan was pretty simple. Run, run, run, control the TOP.

UNLV's terrible offense had a lot to do with it.


You say don't be fooled by the score because of a fumble returned for a touchdown... well the Badgers fumbled the ball on the 1 yard line and the Rebels returned that one 82 yards and scored on the following play.. that makes your point moot.

Again, it was more about the fact of the Rebels offense was a complete non-entity, so the defense got almost no rest. I'd say the defense did pretty well, all things considered.


Almost all the yardage for the Rebels came in the final 20 minutes of the game when the Badgers were already starting to rest their starters so if everything stayed the same, UNLV may not have even gained 100 yards and could have only had 14 points and the Badgers may have ended up with 50+ points.

I'm not seeing where there's any real disagreement here.


It was complete domination aside from two huge mistakes(pick six, fumble returned 80 yards). The result was to be expected from a very good Badger football team.

But those two huge mistakes could have cost the Badgers the game. Again, if UNLV had any offense to speak of, it becomes an entirely different contest.


John Clay is one FAT mofo though. He will lose about 10-15 pounds by Big Ten play and will look a little better come that time. James White on the other hand looked like the best running back on the Badgers and that's over John Clay who won the BTPOY last season. Pretty sweet problem to have for the Badgers.

He's definitely a big boy. But Wisconsin having a stable of good running backs is nothing new. The Badgers usually go at least 2 or 3 deep with really good or great tailbacks as you know.

MJ4H
09-05-2010, 11:23 AM
Florida will be fine once they learn to snap the ball.

BishopMVP
09-05-2010, 11:26 AM
Eh. Jefferson is my boy, since he went to my HS. But while he has improved, I don't think he will ever be the complete package at QB.

IMO of course, LSU has the best offensive and defensive athlete in the nation. Russell Shepard has Harvin's skill set, but is even faster. Patrick Peterson has elite CB athletic ability on a 6'1 222 frame. The story of the game is that Miles and company has found the way to put those guys in a position to win a game. They have to be the playmakers, not Jefferson. Don't know if we can compete for the SEC with Jefferson at QB and our current OL, but with Peterson and Shepard it should be a fun ride this year.I'm not on the ground watching every practice, but not putting Russell Shepard at QB strikes me as the type of coaching that is over controlling and scared to put the ball in the hands of your best playmaker.

Mizzou B-ball fan
09-05-2010, 11:31 AM
I mean, I knew this year would be tough as we lost a lot of graduating talent last year (which was such a missed opportunity as I thought we should have been so much better last year), but...

SI

Never fear.........October 15th is just around the corner.

Tigercat
09-05-2010, 01:00 PM
I'm not on the ground watching every practice, but not putting Russell Shepard at QB strikes me as the type of coaching that is over controlling and scared to put the ball in the hands of your best playmaker.

I can't speak on RS's ability to throw the ball at the college level, because even when at QB last year he didn't throw the ball. But it appeared last year that RS isn't the type of guy that can lead a team out of the huddle. He is a bright kid, but even though he was a QB in HS he struggled with all the little things it takes to lead an offense pre-snap. Maybe it was just freshman inexperience/jitters, but it appears that the LSU staff thinks it was more than that.

I would be surprised if you don't see him as a wildcat QB here and there this year though. (Just like Harvin did on occasion.)

Cuckoo
09-05-2010, 03:32 PM
Meltdown in Soonerland after the narrow win over Utah State. First games are often sloppy, but this one did not look good based on what OU expected. It's fair to say there's a lot more concern about next week's FSU game than there was before this weekend.

Radii
09-05-2010, 05:00 PM
Anyone watching Tulsa/ECU? Down 49-45 with 5 seconds left in the game on the Tulsa 33 yard line, ECU throws up a hail mary that is caught by a 6'8 250 pound tight end, ECU wins 51-49. Crazy.

DeToxRox
09-05-2010, 05:00 PM
ECU vs Tulsa, just wow. 10 straight possessions ended in TD's, with ECU capping it on a hail marry with no time left to win 51-49.

DeToxRox
09-05-2010, 05:22 PM
WOW

SMU's Kicker hit a 61 yard FG!

the_meanstrosity
09-05-2010, 05:54 PM
I mean, I knew this year would be tough as we lost a lot of graduating talent last year (which was such a missed opportunity as I thought we should have been so much better last year), but...

SI

The offense shouldn't be as poor as it looked last night. Play calling had a lot to do with it. You can't run 30+ times and your only runs over 2 yards are reverses. That means your offensive line isn't getting the push they need. So if that's the case then you need to change your game plan. Turner Gill and the offensive staff didn't do that, but instead threw a different QB and different RB out there. Ugh.

I'm not sure what to do with Kale Pick. He definitely has happy feet back there. There were times where he started feeling a little pressure and he would put himself into an even worse position. The sad thing is that Jordan Webb didn't look much better.

Running back and offensive line are key to this offense under Gill and those are probably the biggest weaknesses on this offense. If Turner Gill is dead set on running the ball this season then Kansas football is in for a world of hurt. And based off what I saw last night, Turner Gill is dead set on it. I did not expect this at all from Turner Gill.

digamma
09-05-2010, 07:19 PM
The Black Santa resigned from UNC today.

tarcone
09-05-2010, 08:41 PM
I got home about an hour ago from Iowa. Good game by the Hawks. Stayed within themselves. Scary moment when Stanzi went down.

I watched the TCU/Oregon State game. TCU is way overrated. They are like Northwestern or Missouri. A decent team. But if they played in a BCS conference they would have 3-5 losses. I hope their SOS kills any chance of the BCS title game.

Karlifornia
09-05-2010, 08:47 PM
I watched the TCU/Oregon State game. TCU is way overrated. They are like Northwestern or Missouri. A decent team. But if they played in a BCS conference they would have 3-5 losses. I hope their SOS kills any chance of the BCS title game.


Completely wrong.

RainMaker
09-05-2010, 08:53 PM
There isn't a conference in the country where TCU would lose 3 games. The Mountain West was better than half the BCS Conferences last year.

Swaggs
09-05-2010, 09:23 PM
There isn't a conference in the country where TCU would lose 3 games. The Mountain West was better than half the BCS Conferences last year.

TCU could compete in any conference, but it isn't inconceivable that they could lose 3+ games in a good conference.

The Mountain West has had some very good years, but they were top heavy last season and pretty clearly the 7th best conference. They essentially had two elite teams in TCU and BYU, two pretty good teams in Utah and Air Force, and then five teams that were among the worst in the country.

Most of the existing BCS conferences have one or maybe two teams that are worse than the fifth best team in the MWC. That makes a big difference over the course of a full season.

RainMaker
09-05-2010, 09:55 PM
TCU could compete in any conference, but it isn't inconceivable that they could lose 3+ games in a good conference.

The Mountain West has had some very good years, but they were top heavy last season and pretty clearly the 7th best conference. They essentially had two elite teams in TCU and BYU, two pretty good teams in Utah and Air Force, and then five teams that were among the worst in the country.

Most of the existing BCS conferences have one or maybe two teams that are worse than the fifth best team in the MWC. That makes a big difference over the course of a full season.
What conference do you feel like they'd lose 3-5 games in? I'm not saying they are world beaters or title contenders, but I just don't see any stacked conferences in college football this year.

tarcone
09-05-2010, 10:00 PM
The Big10.
Wisconsin, Iowa, Ohio St. are losses.
They would struggle with PsU, and on the road at MSU and Northwestern.
Michigan looks to have improved and would give them a game, if they played at the big house.

Karlifornia
09-05-2010, 10:03 PM
The Big10.
Wisconsin, Iowa, Ohio St. are losses.
They would struggle with PsU, and on the road at MSU and Northwestern.
Michigan looks to have improved and would give them a game, if they played at the big house.

Shocking answer!

RainMaker
09-05-2010, 10:08 PM
Ohio State is the only team in that conference that is better than them. They'd also be playing half their games at home and likely not hitting all the top teams in the conference in the same year. They'd finish 6-2 in the Big 10.

If you think they're at the bottom of that conference, you just don't watch much college football.

tarcone
09-05-2010, 10:25 PM
I didnt say they were at the bottom. They may play Minnesota, Indiana, Purdue, and Illinois.
But if you really think they are better then Iowa and Wisconsin, you guys dont watch college football.

They dont play defense in the PAC 12. It is offense, offense, offense. And TCU struggled against a PAC 12 defense.
Play a real defense (Iowa and Wisconsin come to mind. Oh yeah, PsU plays pretty good defense too. Oh yeah, Northwestern plays pretty good defense, too.). I imagine it wouldnt be a 30-21 victory wouldnt happen.

TCU may pick one of those teams off. I bet they finish 5-3 in the Big10. But then again, you have to have depth to play in a BCS conference. Does TCU have depth?

mckerney
09-05-2010, 10:29 PM
The Big10.
Wisconsin, Iowa, Ohio St. are losses.
They would struggle with PsU, and on the road at MSU and Northwestern.
Michigan looks to have improved and would give them a game, if they played at the big house.

I don't see that at all. Wisconsin is something like 3-10 against teams finishing in the top half of the Big Ten over the last 3 years, no way would I put them as a team that's a lock against for TCU. Iowa and PSU would both be a helluva game to watch against TCU, but I don't think either one is even close to an automatic defeat. And I'd probably pick TCU on the road against Northwestern or MSU, neither of those teams were even competitive against Penn State or Ohio State in their last home match ups. Ohio State is obviously the toughest, and even if they did win that one I think they stumble somewhere along the way, but I'd be surprised if they lost 3 games were they playing in the Big Ten this year.

Chief Rum
09-05-2010, 10:29 PM
They dont play defense in the PAC 12. It is offense, offense, offense. And TCU struggled against a PAC 12 defense.
Play a real defense (Iowa and Wisconsin come to mind. Oh yeah, PsU plays pretty good defense too. Oh yeah, Northwestern plays pretty good defense, too.). I imagine it wouldnt be a 30-21 victory wouldnt happen.

It's amazing to me that actual thinking individuals still hold to this. It just proves they don't have a clue.

tarcone
09-05-2010, 10:38 PM
Ok. Oregon State doesnt play defense.

tarcone
09-05-2010, 10:57 PM
PAC 10 total defense rankings 2009:

13. Arizona St
25. Arizona
32. UCLA
35. Oregon
40. USC
46. Oregon St.
72. California
79. Washington
90. Stanford
120. Washington St.

LOL. I stand by my original statement. These defenses stink. Its amazing to me that actual fans think the PAC 10 plays defense. It just proves they dont have a clue.

hxxp://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2009&rpt=IA_teamtotdef&site=org

Eaglesfan27
09-05-2010, 11:16 PM
Why didn't you quote 2008 when USC's defense was 1st in the nation and put their entire set of linebackers in the NFL? There have been some very good defenses in the Pac-10 this past decade.

RainMaker
09-05-2010, 11:41 PM
And the Big 10 doesn't play offense.

25. Wisconsin
36. Michigan State
41. Michigan
51. Ohio State
52. Penn State
56. Purdue
71. Northwestern
81. Illinois
84. Indiana
87. Iowa
100. Minnesota

Oregon State has a better offense than anyone Iowa will see all year.

Swaggs
09-06-2010, 01:11 AM
What conference do you feel like they'd lose 3-5 games in? I'm not saying they are world beaters or title contenders, but I just don't see any stacked conferences in college football this year.

I think they are legitimate title contenders, but I think they could lose 3+ games in any of the other BCS conferences. In the SEC, would it be a complete shock if they lost to Florida, Alabama, and then got picked off by an Arkansas or South Carolina or Georgia? In the ACC, it wouldn't be a shock if they lost to one of the Florida teams (FSU or Miami), Virginia Tech, and then dropped one to a BC or Georgia Tech or Clemson. In the Big 12, would you bet your house or life savings that they would be above .500 if they had a stretch of games where they played Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Nebraska, and Oklahoma State?

And even though I don't share tarcone's enthusiasm for the Big Ten, I still think playing a stretch of Michigan, Wisconisn, Ohio State, Penn State, (even) Purdue or Indiana, and then Iowa is a pretty tough stretch to go through without a couple of losses.

In most of the existing BCS conferences, you aren't going to have double digit spreads over more than one or two of your conference mates in any given season. In the Mountain West, over the past few seasons, if one of the big three (TCU, Utah, BYU) go undefeated against the other two, they are going to be double digit favorites over the other six teams in most seasons. They are extremely top heavy because of the varying levels of program development and dedication within the league.

Swaggs
09-06-2010, 01:16 AM
Aren't there enough defensive players from USC in the NFL to pretty well negate the "Pac 10 doesn't play defense" mantra? :)

You could pretty much field an entire defense from current NFL defenders out of Southern Cal.

JonInMiddleGA
09-06-2010, 01:38 AM
Why didn't you quote 2008 when USC's defense was 1st in the nation and put their entire set of linebackers in the NFL?

You mean the year their schedule included teams ranked:
#119,#118,#115, and #110 in scoring offense? That's 4 of the 11 least productive offenses in D-1.

I'll acknowledge that they held both Arizona & Cal, who were high scoring teams in '08, far under their averages & that's good.
But when 1/3rd of your schedule is against the absolute offensive pits, it certainly helps the scoring defense number.

MrBug708
09-06-2010, 02:06 AM
Aren't there enough defensive players from USC in the NFL to pretty well negate the "Pac 10 doesn't play defense" mantra? :)

You could pretty much field an entire defense from current NFL defenders out of Southern Cal.

I would assume that if the PAC-10 had offenses like those of the Big-11, we'd see much better defensive ratings. The opposite holds true as well

tarcone
09-06-2010, 12:18 PM
I was thinking about the whole Pac 10 doesnt play defense and the Big 10 doesnt play offense. And I think we are both right. The Pac 10 is a conference that is geared towards dynamic offenses. And that makes the defenses worse. While the Big 10 is, and has always been, 3 yards and a cloud of dust. And that makes the offenses look worse.

So in reality, yes the Pac 10 doesnt play good defense and the Big 10 doesnt play good offense. Or the Pac 10 plays very good offense and the Big 10 plays very good defense.

I guess it depends on how you look at it.

tarcone
09-06-2010, 12:19 PM
Just as mrBug said and I didnt read before I posted. :)

Swaggs
09-06-2010, 12:33 PM
Kind of a bummer (even though I know he might not have many fans at Penn State or USC), but Vidal Hazelton is out for the season. He had to sit out all of last season as a transfer and then injured himself in Cincy's first game against Fresno State.

Lathum
09-06-2010, 12:40 PM
I was thinking about the whole Pac 10 doesnt play defense and the Big 10 doesnt play offense. And I think we are both right. The Pac 10 is a conference that is geared towards dynamic offenses. And that makes the defenses worse. While the Big 10 is, and has always been, 3 yards and a cloud of dust. And that makes the offenses look worse.

So in reality, yes the Pac 10 doesnt play good defense and the Big 10 doesnt play good offense. Or the Pac 10 plays very good offense and the Big 10 plays very good defense.

I guess it depends on how you look at it.

I would look at it from the POV of who puts the most talent from that side of the ball into the NFL.

The PAC 10 puts plenty of defensive guys into the NFL, how many offensive studs come out of the Big 10?

tarcone
09-06-2010, 12:58 PM
I would look at it from the POV of who puts the most talent from that side of the ball into the NFL.

The PAC 10 puts plenty of defensive guys into the NFL, how many offensive studs come out of the Big 10?

Plenty of offensive linemen and running backs. But then again, the Big10 plays smashmouth.

And, just because you put defensive studs into the NFL, doesnt mean you play good defense. Sure it helps, but its not the end all to a great defense.

Matthean
09-06-2010, 01:17 PM
The PAC 10 puts plenty of defensive guys into the NFL, how many offensive studs come out of the Big 10?

Michigan alone has been known for putting OL in the NFL.

EDIT: Oh, and Michigan has had it's share of QBs go as well.

Swaggs
09-06-2010, 01:39 PM
I would look at it from the POV of who puts the most talent from that side of the ball into the NFL.

The PAC 10 puts plenty of defensive guys into the NFL, how many offensive studs come out of the Big 10?

Drew Brees and Tom Brady?

Lathum
09-06-2010, 01:45 PM
OK, so 2 guys in the last 10 years. My point is they aren't putting an insane amount of offensive skill players into the NFL.

Swaggs
09-06-2010, 02:01 PM
I dunno, maybe not everyone has panned out, but Michigan, Michigan St., and Ohio State have all put a ton of receivers into the NFL as high picks. Ohio State and Penn State have done pretty well with getting RBs drafted.

I continue to think that there isn't a whole lot of difference between the talent across college football. The style of play from the coaching and the officiating is probably a bigger contributor than talent inequality.

tarcone
09-06-2010, 03:45 PM
Iowa has put Ladell Betts and Shonn Greene in the NFL recently And TE Tony Moeaki this season.

Chief Rum
09-06-2010, 04:01 PM
My guess is the skill position talent is generally greater in the Pac 10 because most of their players are from California and a little bit from Texas. The Big 10, though, probably has more brawn, as they draw their kids from the colder Midwest (the Big Ten's draw will be wider, because they are closer to key spots in the South, Florida, and the East Coast, in addition to their own territory, but a higher percentage of kids out West end up at Pac 10 schools).

I think the local clime doesn't just affect the development of kids in those areas, but also the types of offenses and defenses which work the best, and the local attitudes about those offenses and defenses as well.

mauchow
09-06-2010, 04:01 PM
It is pointless to talk about INDIVIDUAL players in a game where TEAM means so much.

Atocep
09-06-2010, 04:53 PM
Took 1 week to be reminded of how terrible a coach Fridge is.

tarcone
09-06-2010, 05:05 PM
Im real excited about the game tonight. Should be a barn burner. Or as Hayden Fry says "A high porch picnic."

Galaril
09-06-2010, 07:08 PM
So this is considered a neutral field? I hope Boise smokes VT.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 07:09 PM
bad call their on the PI I think.

RainMaker
09-06-2010, 07:09 PM
College uniforms have jumped the shark.

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 07:09 PM
Boise Football !!! FUMBLE!!!

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 07:10 PM
I think the uni's look pretty sharp actually.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 07:11 PM
I think the uni's look pretty sharp actually.

Me too.

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 07:14 PM
Good opening Defense for VTech. 3-0 boise. I'm rooting for Boise, but I'd like to see VT play a solid game still.

NorvTurnerOverdrive
09-06-2010, 07:14 PM
College uniforms have jumped the shark.
i see those vt uniforms and all i can think of is zubazz.

Young Drachma
09-06-2010, 07:14 PM
3-0 Broncos. I prefer they win, only because fairly or not..if they lose, voters plan to take it out on every mid-major the rest of the year.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 07:17 PM
bad call their on the PI I think.

How in the world can you possibly make this claim?

Honolulu_Blue
09-06-2010, 07:19 PM
I shat several items today that look better than these uni's. Boise St should have to forfeit wearing jerseys uglier than the Detroit Lions throwbacks.

I think the Boise St. uniforms look fine. Then again, I really liked the Detroit Lions throwbacks, so what do I know.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 07:20 PM
How in the world can you possibly make this claim?

It looked like he had turned back to the bakll at the last minute and was going for the ball. But it probably was the right call on a second look to be honest.

RainMaker
09-06-2010, 07:20 PM
I like Virginia Tech's but think they'd be better if the numbers were solid. Agree on Boise looking like the Lions' throwbacks.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 07:20 PM
Wow who is the mid major in this game?

wade moore
09-06-2010, 07:23 PM
It looked like he had turned back to the bakll at the last minute and was going for the ball. But it probably was the right call on a second look to be honest.

Gotcha...

And Boise St. beats VA Tech at their own game and end up with a TD.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 07:24 PM
Well this is a bit of a surprise. It is only 10-0 but just the total domination by Boise was something I was certainly not expecting and basic on the home field of VT.

CU Tiger
09-06-2010, 07:25 PM
wow.....

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 07:31 PM
Boise is no joke folks. Somehow I still see a BCS screwjob forth coming later this yet.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 07:35 PM
Boise is no joke folks. Somehow I still see a BCS screwjob forth coming later this yet.

Maybe this will shut up Cowherd on ESPN Radio and all the hate the guy has for BS.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 07:39 PM
This Coles kid is a moron.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 07:39 PM
Maybe this will shut up Cowherd on ESPN Radio and all the hate the guy has for BS.

Meh, he's all an act.

RainMaker
09-06-2010, 07:39 PM
Really dumb penalties.

Radii
09-06-2010, 07:40 PM
looks like that dude went out of his way to shove the punter... way to go dumbass.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 07:41 PM
looks like that dude went out of his way to shove the punter... way to go dumbass.

Yeah, I didn't get the "that was close" commentary - there was absolutely no need to push him, the guy went out of his way to push the Punter over.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 07:45 PM
#18 out to get a blanket party by his teammates tonight after this one. So, I guess Beamer will be the elder statesmen in College coaching to be asked to resign after this season if this game is any indication on VT's season.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 07:46 PM
Is Boise St. that good, or is Tech again overrated?

Right now, the Broncos sure as hell look good.

Young Drachma
09-06-2010, 07:46 PM
Wow.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 07:48 PM
Damn that was one hell of a catch. I thought he had no chance to get it from the live camera angle.

larrymcg421
09-06-2010, 07:48 PM
Is Boise St. that good, or is Tech again overrated?

Right now, the Broncos sure as hell look good.

Could be a little of both, but Boise State is seriously making some great plays, regardless of how good/bad Va Tech is playing.

Izulde
09-06-2010, 07:51 PM
Keep on looking good, Boise State. The better our future conference members look, the better for our conference when they join in two years. :)

Noop
09-06-2010, 07:52 PM
Virgina Tech is pissing me off. Cmon Hokies ACC pride!

Galaril
09-06-2010, 07:55 PM
Meh, he's all an act.

Yup, which I guess why I play him in my office every morning:) But still he says some of the most assine things.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 07:56 PM
Keep on looking good, Boise State. The better our future conference members look, the better for our conference when they join in two years. :)

Hey what do you mean our conference BS joined our (MWC) conference;)

Galaril
09-06-2010, 07:58 PM
Could be a little of both, but Boise State is seriously making some great plays, regardless of how good/bad Va Tech is playing.

The thing I am most surprised is how quick AND athletic Boise State is.

Swaggs
09-06-2010, 07:59 PM
I like Virginia Tech's but think they'd be better if the numbers were solid. Agree on Boise looking like the Lions' throwbacks.

I think VPI's helmets are awesome, but the numbers really screw up the jerseys for me.

Boise State's look like a CFL uniform.

MJ4H
09-06-2010, 07:59 PM
Thought he didn't have controll of the ball before he went out of bounds, myself. Surprised that held up.

Izulde
09-06-2010, 08:01 PM
Hey what do you mean our conference BS joined our (MWC) conference;)

Right but they don't officially join until 2012. Hence why I said future.

Radii
09-06-2010, 08:02 PM
is anyone else fixated on how hideous the cheerleader next to the replay booth looks? Poor girl. Maybe its just too much makeup.

Swaggs
09-06-2010, 08:02 PM
What was the spread on this one?

RainMaker
09-06-2010, 08:05 PM
What was the spread on this one?
Jumped around a bit. Ended up being even at the end.

Radii
09-06-2010, 08:05 PM
What was the spread on this one?

I have Va Tech at +2 in the new lock of the week contest that duckman started up here. That was as of Friday I think, dunno how it moved from there.

Lathum
09-06-2010, 08:05 PM
Maybe this will shut up Cowherd on ESPN Radio and all the hate the guy has for BS.

Cowherd has said many times he loves BS and the program and that he just doesn't think they are as good as top bcs schools.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 08:06 PM
Cowherd has said many times he loves BS and the program and that he just doesn't think they are as good as top bcs schools.

And not that I'm a Cowherd fan, I'm not, but I think he's a pretty big VT hater too.

SirFozzie
09-06-2010, 08:21 PM
Tech gets nothing after so many breaks? Stick a fork in them, they're DONE.

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 08:24 PM
Cowherd knows how to play to his audience...he just says stuff to rile people up.

MJ4H
09-06-2010, 08:28 PM
These idiot announcers are pretty biased. Driving me up the wall. When BSU does something positive they are through the roof with excitement. When VT does something positive, they are deadpan (esp. Musberger).

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 08:28 PM
Tech gets nothing after so many breaks? Stick a fork in them, they're DONE.

Hmmmm

mauchow
09-06-2010, 08:29 PM
annnd we've got a ball game.

JonInMiddleGA
09-06-2010, 08:29 PM
BIG touchdown for VT right there.

Suicane75
09-06-2010, 08:42 PM
Boise really needs a time consuming scoring drive of any sort to start the second half and keep the score and clock on their side.

tarcone
09-06-2010, 08:45 PM
Sorry about the size. Here are my daughters at their very 1st Iowa game. This is after the game. These were our seats. A great time had by all.


http://i53.tinypic.com/2u62oux.jpg

Scoobz0202
09-06-2010, 08:54 PM
Beautiful daughters. Too bad their dad doesn't know shit about good football :)

JPhillips
09-06-2010, 09:01 PM
Hurts my heart to think how sad they'll look after the OSU game.

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 09:04 PM
I think he got away with DPI there

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 09:08 PM
good game so far. VT looking solid after a really slow and bat start. Boise isn't done, I think we all know that. should be a great final 25 minutes.

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 09:09 PM
dola I knew Boise was good but I am a lil surprised how good they have been so far from home and in front of mostly VT fans.

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 09:13 PM
Fumble...VT ball

Scoobz0202
09-06-2010, 09:13 PM
Musberger(sp?) sounded disappointed that VT recovered that.

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 09:19 PM
lol great game!

Galaril
09-06-2010, 09:20 PM
I love how now Musberger has jumped over to the VT band wagon to funny. What a front runner.

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 09:21 PM
I'm just glad this isn't Ohio State coming back...because I dont think I could handle the excitement between Brent and Kirk.

JonInMiddleGA
09-06-2010, 09:21 PM
I can't imagine too situations where I'd say this but ... Hokie Hokie Hokie Hi !

JonInMiddleGA
09-06-2010, 09:22 PM
A pick six would be great right about here

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 09:22 PM
I can't imagine too situations where I'd say this but ... Hokie Hokie Hokie Hi !

I agree!

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 09:24 PM
WOW that was crazy! fast mofo.

JonInMiddleGA
09-06-2010, 09:24 PM
Brent Musberger is listed as day-to-day (hamstring) injured while jumping from one bandwagon back to the other.

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 09:25 PM
Gotta say this game is better than the Florida State - Miami shit fests that are usually played on this night.

RainMaker
09-06-2010, 09:25 PM
Can't think of a game where two teams with such highly praised special teams played so poorly.

larrymcg421
09-06-2010, 09:33 PM
Gotta say this game is better than the Florida State - Miami shit fests that are usually played on this night.

Uh, last year's Miami-FSU game was one of the best they've had.

Lathum
09-06-2010, 09:34 PM
Sick game, what a horrible penalty to take

Radii
09-06-2010, 09:35 PM
I can't imagine too situations where I'd say this but ... Hokie Hokie Hokie Hi !

I think this is the one and only situation to say that. Go Hokies!

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 09:35 PM
WOW. Huge fucking difference there from a fkn field goal horrid miss to an EZ walk in touch down on 4th down. + two point conversion maybe could be an 8 point swing.

tarcone
09-06-2010, 09:35 PM
This is an exciting game. Good times.

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 09:36 PM
Uh, last year's Miami-FSU game was one of the best they've had.

The anomaly

JonInMiddleGA
09-06-2010, 09:50 PM
Did someone mention FSU?

Lathum
09-06-2010, 09:55 PM
2 stupid penalties uncharacteristically taken by Boise.

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 09:58 PM
Dear Kirk...you can use the football to keep you up. Just as long as your knee or elbow doesnt hit.

mauchow
09-06-2010, 09:59 PM
That was a pretty sweet run..

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 09:59 PM
wow. I thought he was down. crazy play.

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 10:00 PM
And if you use the football to keep you up and you fumble...it is the only time the ground can cause a fumble.

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 10:00 PM
Williams wow what an awful game besides the TDs

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 10:01 PM
big play right here on 3rd down.

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 10:02 PM
what a great game

mauchow
09-06-2010, 10:02 PM
Was Taylor really yelling at the center? The whole team wasn't even set, dude. Relax.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:02 PM
That running into the kicker on the missed FG is looming HUGE right now!

Talk about a game decided by special teams play.

BishopMVP
09-06-2010, 10:08 PM
The Big10.
Wisconsin, Iowa, Ohio St. are losses.
They would struggle with PsU, and on the road at MSU and Northwestern.
Michigan looks to have improved and would give them a game, if they played at the big house.1-0 (too soon?)Is Boise St. that good, or is Tech again overrated?Good thing they don't call games after the 1st quarter. :)

btw, my pet peeve of the week - retards celebrating plays where they didn't affect the outcome. ND had a pass into the end zone where Floyd broke free but the QB overthrew him as the DB was desperately clutching at his jersey. Both officials saw the PI but (correctly) signaled "uncatchable" - as the CB and S are high-fiving and dancing a jig in the foreground.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 10:09 PM
I don't understand the somewhat conservative gameplay calling by BS with all the runs up the gut.

tarcone
09-06-2010, 10:10 PM
Too early. Ill do it after we beat Ohio St. :)

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 10:24 PM
Good no call

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:24 PM
I saw live it was on the side, I was surprised the flag was thrown.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:25 PM
Good no call

+1

Thought he hit him on the side live. The ref reacted to the VT bench.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:25 PM
God damn I'm glad football is back.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:26 PM
That is a HORRIBLE late hit call.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:26 PM
I think they should have no-called the late hit.

BishopMVP
09-06-2010, 10:26 PM
Late hit on that? Weak.

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 10:26 PM
Now I am not a fan of this personal foul call...only because the whistle was late and it wasn't clear he was OOB.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:27 PM
Yeah, exactly Sak - even Pettus thought the play was live still.

Man, late hit into that poor camera guy ;)..

tarcone
09-06-2010, 10:28 PM
Will a TCU/Boise ST. National Championship game Cause a playoff system?

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:28 PM
wow.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:28 PM
Right before the ball was snapped on that play, FedEx was louder than it has EVER been for a Skins game.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:28 PM
Ummm Brent...BSU is not Cinderella anymore nor have they been for sometime. They are damn good football team.

Young Drachma
09-06-2010, 10:28 PM
How do you leave Pettis open like that?

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:29 PM
How badly does BSU want that botched EP back now?

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:29 PM
Now let's see what Taylor can do.

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 10:29 PM
I want some OT!

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:30 PM
What a horrible angle by number 30 on that return - he should have had the returner at the 20.

mauchow
09-06-2010, 10:31 PM
Holy crap. How can there be 1 on 1 coverage that deep down the field. I'm sorry but that's just horrible.

BishopMVP
09-06-2010, 10:31 PM
How badly does BSU want that botched EP back now?Ehh... VT wouldn't have gone for 2, so it's a wash.

So close there.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:31 PM
Looked like 13 misjudged it and at the last moment got his hand in there.

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 10:32 PM
You can't take a sack like that...throw it away.

mauchow
09-06-2010, 10:32 PM
I wouldn't mind this game going into OT.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:32 PM
Ehh... VT wouldn't have gone for 2, so it's a wash.

So close there.

Good point - hadn't thought about that.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 10:32 PM
That was worse that VT's pass play call.

yes it was terrible but the TD looked inevitable. It probably would have been better for BS if they did not call it since they probably would have ran more time off the clock scoring.

Bigsmooth
09-06-2010, 10:32 PM
Great game. Love college football!

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:33 PM
Either way, both teams have shown that they seem to be legit Top 10 squads this season.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:33 PM
4th and 11 - biggest play of Tyrod's career?

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:33 PM
Another good no-call.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:34 PM
WOW. He should have caught that ball.

mauchow
09-06-2010, 10:34 PM
Oh, man. He had it.. wow

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:34 PM
(although I would think that VT fans feel it was horrible call)

Dr. Sak
09-06-2010, 10:34 PM
There was no DPI there...no advantage gained.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 10:34 PM
Win or lose VT and their fans got nothing to be ashamed that is for sure. BS is damn lucky to win this one

Young Drachma
09-06-2010, 10:34 PM
Game, set, match. Great game, heck of a start to the season.

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 10:34 PM
GAME OVER~! YEA BOISE!!! WOOOOHOOO!!!

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:34 PM
And VT ices the game before that with a simple run call.

I agree that they were over-thinking it by throwing a pass, but it wasn't "over" with a run call.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:35 PM
It's going to be an interesting college FB season to say the least.

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 10:35 PM
VT Played GREAT, Boise played GREAT, both teams are damn lucky. Boise was better on this day. that is all.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:35 PM
Game, set, match. Great game, heck of a start to the season.

Big time. Great friggin' game to finish off the first weekend of real football.

Young Drachma
09-06-2010, 10:35 PM
Props to Virginia Tech for having the courage to even play this game.

BishopMVP
09-06-2010, 10:35 PM
Holy crap. How can there be 1 on 1 coverage that deep down the field. I'm sorry but that's just horrible.Still better than VT's coverage on the Boise TD. I still don't know what that safety was thinking - there is 1 receiver on your half of the field, and 2 other defensive players in front of you - don't let Pettis get open behind you.

Oof, another borderline non-call against VT. I really hope Oregon St. beats Boise - the rest of that schedule is a joke.

Galaril
09-06-2010, 10:36 PM
Two great teams for sure.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:36 PM
I thought both looked pretty sketchy and the playcalling for VT may lose them another game or 2.

I think some of that can be contributed to it being the first game of the season.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:37 PM
It takes the clock down to a minute at the most and puts much more pressure on BSU.

And BSU scored in less than a minute, your point?

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 10:37 PM
Props to Virginia Tech for having the courage to even play this game.

exactly.

JonInMiddleGA
09-06-2010, 10:38 PM
Pity Va Tech didn't bother to show up for the start of the game. Bad news for the ACC is that I suspect this makes them more dangerous than they would have been otherwise.

For Boise, they just have to avoid losing to any of the high school teams that make up the rest of their schedule, bully for them.

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 10:40 PM
I think Boise , if they go undefeated, there season really really depends on how VT does the rest of the year.

k0ruptr
09-06-2010, 10:41 PM
#24 ranked Oregon St. is a high school team now.

Boise's schedule is weak, but that is the WAC. There OOC schedule includes 2 top 25 teams. Nevada from the WAC could very well be in the top 25 by the end of the season as well. They have a great team this year. So lets see. The schedule isnt great, but the part they control is not bad at all. They will probably end up playing 4 -5 bowl teams this year. I dunno , I think its weak, but not nearly as bad as people seem to think.

RainMaker
09-06-2010, 10:44 PM
#24 ranked Oregon St. is a high school team now.
The ACC is a power conference.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:46 PM
For Boise, they just have to avoid losing to any of the high school teams that make up the rest of their schedule, bully for them.

I really hope they play an SEC team in whatever bowl game they end up in. It seems like that is the only way some of the good ole boys will ever accept any team having any talent outside of the "best conference" in the world.:rolleyes:

Maybe one of the SEC teams should schedule a home and home with BSU instead of scheduling the likes of San Jose State, Georgia State, Appalachian State, etc if they have a problem that BSU might take their entitled spot in a major bowl game due to the conference they play in.

RainMaker
09-06-2010, 10:47 PM
I really hope they play an SEC team in whatever bowl game they end up in. It seems like that is the only way some of the good ole boys will ever accept any team having any talent outside of the "best conference" in the world.:rolleyes:

Maybe one of the SEC teams should schedule a home and home with BSU instead of scheduling the likes of San Jose State, Georgia State, Appalachian State, etc if they have a problem that BSU might take their entitled spot in a major bowl game due to the conference they play in.
Or Jacksonville State.

And remember that Utah curbstomped Alabama a couple years ago in a BCS game.

wade moore
09-06-2010, 10:52 PM
Different pressure running a 1 minute drill than a 2 minute. A couple of yards on the ground potentially changes the punt distance etc. Quite a few variables starting with chopping their time in half. May not have won the game but it was something that very directly led to the loss (as an example of bad playcalling/execution all night).

That's all fine and good.

You made the claim that a run would have "iced" the game.

That's simply not accurate. It would have made it tougher, but BSU showed they are capable of scoring in under a minute.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:55 PM
And remember that Utah curbstomped Alabama a couple years ago in a BCS game.

"But Alabama didn't even want to be there so they didn't play hard". (SEC homers)

But whatever. We'll see how this season plays out. Fun end to week 1 and I'm looking forward to see what happens the rest of the way.

Lathum
09-06-2010, 10:55 PM
It was a great game, but sadly games like this make it less and less likely teams like Boise, TCU, BYU, etc... will have any luck booking a tough OOC schedule.

kingfc22
09-06-2010, 10:56 PM
It was a great game, but sadly games like this make it less and less likely teams like Boise, TCU, BYU, etc... will have any luck booking a tough OOC schedule.

Which is why we need some type of playoff system so that games like this can be played. But that will never happen.:rant:

BishopMVP
09-06-2010, 11:02 PM
Maybe one of the SEC teams should schedule a home and home with BSU instead of scheduling the likes of San Jose State, Georgia State, Appalachian State, etc if they have a problem that BSU might take their entitled spot in a major bowl game due to the conference they play in.Most schedules are agreed on 4-5 years in advance... and 5 years ago when Boise played Georgia they got taken behind the woodshed. Did anyone in 2005 really think that Boise State would be a top 10 team in 2010? Plus, for what it's worth they are opening against Ole Miss next year.

RainMaker
09-06-2010, 11:04 PM
Most schedules are agreed on 4-5 years in advance... and 5 years ago when Boise played Georgia they got taken behind the woodshed. Did anyone in 2005 really think that Boise State would be a top 10 team in 2010? Plus, for what it's worth they are opening against Ole Miss next year.
Teams do back out too. Like Texas Tech who replaced TCU with Weber State.

JonInMiddleGA
09-06-2010, 11:09 PM
Plus, for what it's worth they are opening against Ole Miss next year.

That does not bode well for Ole Miss. I mean, we've seen what happens when they play a I-AA team ;)

Ksyrup
09-07-2010, 09:45 AM
Would be hilarious if OSU lost to both TCU and BSU, then wins the PAC-10.

Really, all BSU can do is win the games, but if VT and OSU don't win 9-11 games this year, those wins will easily be discounted. If VT ends up 8-4, all this hype will have been for nothing. They'd need a perfect storm of upsets to force the voters to choose them over a bunch of 2-3 loss teams.

molson
09-07-2010, 09:55 AM
I think most Boise St. fans are more than happy to beat another BCS team - this one a #10 on the "road", and then go through the rest of the reason while everyone else freaks out over the ramifications and, while some try to minimize their accomplishments with reasons that are a real stretch. They've beaten almost everyone in front of them the last 4-5 years. And I think people misunderstand the schedule arguments. Yes, a good schedule creates a better resume for things like national championships, and provides more direct evidence that a team is GREAT. But the reverse isn't true. A weaker schedule isn't evidence that a team isn't GREAT. If one assumes Alabama is the best team in the country - they'd still be the best team in the country if their schedule was entirely made up of 1-AA teams. You would just have to rely on more circumstantial evidence to get to that conclusion.

This game though, was pretty solid direct evidence of how good Boise St. is. We'll see how many schools beat teams ranked in the top #10 on the road this season. That won't be a huge number.

Boise St. and their fans, thank god, doesn't live yet in the depressing world of big-time college football where you either win a championship or you suck. Amd a player/coach/fan that doesn't control the schedule - undefeated means a lot, more than the conclusions of people on message boards and the media about what that means, and maybe even more than a national championship determined by means completely outside their control.

Matthean
09-07-2010, 10:25 AM
"But Alabama didn't even want to be there so they didn't play hard". (SEC homers)

It didn't help that their OL had to be rearranged so close to the game as well. Still, no excuse for that defense to mail it in like they did. It's one game that will forever irk me.

Poli
09-07-2010, 10:43 AM
And if you use the football to keep you up and you fumble...it is the only time the ground can cause a fumble.
PING: ClintStoerner4Heisman.

MJ4H
09-07-2010, 10:47 AM
See I knew it.

Poli
09-07-2010, 10:49 AM
Knew what? ;)

Ksyrup
09-07-2010, 11:02 AM
This game though, was pretty solid direct evidence of how good Boise St. is. We'll see how many schools beat teams ranked in the top #10 on the road this season. That won't be a huge number.

Again, let's see where VT ends up. Beating #10 mid-November is (or can be) a lot different than beating #10 the first weekend of the year. Every year, there are 2-3 teams ranked in the top 10 that don't even end up ranked at the end of the year. This win might not end up being all that impressive.

molson
09-07-2010, 11:13 AM
Again, let's see where VT ends up. Beating #10 mid-November is (or can be) a lot different than beating #10 the first weekend of the year. Every year, there are 2-3 teams ranked in the top 10 that don't even end up ranked at the end of the year. This win might not end up being all that impressive.

True. It's one of those unique things about college football. But I'm just saying outside those dark upper-administrative rooms in athletic departments where nobody really knows what happens - nobody else has any control over who plays who. (That whole argument about "Boise St. doesn't deserve acclaim, they should schedule better" doesn't apply to any player and any coach on the team, who just go where they're told to go.) So going undefeated is really all that is important to everyone else that is directly involved, and last night was a big step in getting towards that. Perhaps to a SEC school, different kinds of external recognition are more important (and more within their control to attain), and that's fine for them. They can take pride in their brutal schedule of giants, one after another, but Boise St. and schools like it are just in a different position. They got their own thing and their own goals. They can't just choose to play an all-SEC schedule tomorrow or something.

BishopMVP
09-07-2010, 11:43 AM
I'd argue the head coach does have a fair amount of control over the schedule. Not that he can go out and get Alabama to play them at home, but whether the AD tries to set up a tough game or a cupcake.

Young Drachma
09-07-2010, 02:39 PM
They've beaten almost everyone in front of them the last 4-5 years.

This.

They just find ways to win more often than not and it's fun to watch a well-coached team of hungry kids who people consistently doubt perform so well.

For any team at the highest level to lose just four games in four years, it's saying a lot about what they're doing and whether it's playing JV competition or not, it's clear that when they do have to play a big opponent they manage to get the job done more often than not.

Too bad Wyoming will beat them in two weeks in Laramie. ;)