PDA

View Full Version : NFL WR opinion-help solve an argument


Lathum
04-28-2011, 05:04 PM
A Seahawks friend of mine and I are arguing and I need the help of FOFC to solve the argument.

Right now who do you take on your team, Mario Manningham or Mike Williams?

Blackadar
04-28-2011, 05:11 PM
Depends on the scheme and the need. If I want a guy for the slot who has a bit of speed, I'm going for Mario Manningham. If I need a bigger guy on the outside, I'm taking Mike Williams.

If I had to take one, I'll take the younger, faster guy with 9tds over the older, bigger guy who had 2. Especially since MM doesn't have the baggage of Mike Williams (though both guys have baggage galore).

Of course, what spurred this argument? And I'd much rather have Mike Wallace over either.

Sun Tzu
04-28-2011, 05:13 PM
Any FOFC Poll that doesn't have a trout option is bunk.

Lathum
04-28-2011, 05:13 PM
I don't even really remember how it started. I think we were talking about the draft and such and it just kind of went from there.

I realize we aren't talking a clash of titans here or anything. :)

jbergey22
04-28-2011, 05:21 PM
Id take Manningham and its not because of production.

Id be worried if I gave Williams a big paycheck hed get back into his bad habits that almost cost him a NFL career.

I sort of like Manningham as a playmaker.

Rizon
04-28-2011, 06:17 PM
Do I have to pick one?

Mustang
04-28-2011, 06:24 PM
Mario.

I'm not convinced Mike Williams is out of the woods. He came back from just nothing and I'd be worried he would go right back to nothing just as quickly.

Pumpy Tudors
04-28-2011, 06:30 PM
So will your friend accept FOFC's answer?

Lathum
04-28-2011, 06:52 PM
So will your friend accept FOFC's answer?

no, he's stubborn

Glengoyne
04-28-2011, 07:01 PM
Manningham has less upside, but also less baggage.

B & B
04-28-2011, 10:59 PM
BMW is the correct answer but its also what youre fishing for.

Lathum
04-28-2011, 11:01 PM
BMW is the correct answer but its also what youre fishing for.

huh?

B & B
04-28-2011, 11:04 PM
BIG
MIKE
WILLIAMS


= BMW

srsly?

stevew
04-28-2011, 11:06 PM
This thread is really dumb. I mean, a debate over who is the 43rd best receiver in the NFL? Really?

Lathum
04-28-2011, 11:09 PM
This thread is really dumb. I mean, a debate over who is the 43rd best receiver in the NFL? Really?

I was pretty transparent that it was to solve an argument. You always have the option to not click on it.

stevew
04-28-2011, 11:16 PM
Who better? Stevie Johnson or Nate Burleson?

Lathum
04-28-2011, 11:20 PM
Feel free to start that thread and I can choose to vote, not vote, or make douchebag comments in the thread.

M GO BLUE!!!
04-28-2011, 11:22 PM
Any FOFC Poll that doesn't have a trout option is bunk.

It does. Read: "Mike Williams"

(more of a carp, really...)

fantom1979
04-28-2011, 11:47 PM
Fantasy wise, its Manningham and its not close.

If you are going with more skilled receiver, its a little harder because they are completely different receivers. All things being equal, I would go with Manningham because of the skeletons in Williams' closet.

gstelmack
04-29-2011, 08:40 AM
Which Mike Williams?

Atocep
04-29-2011, 06:43 PM
Which Mike Williams?

When I read the 1st post I assumed the one in Tampa since that would be an actual discussion. If it's the fat one from USC then I don't even know why there would be any debate.

I'd take TB Mike Williams over Manningham. I'd take Tom Waddle right now over fat Mike Williams.

Lathum
04-29-2011, 09:43 PM
It is the USC Mike WIlliams